I think the big difference there is that I am actually a photographer. As a photographer, I would never photograph a woman that didn't have a shirt or bra on while holding a baby unless it was actually her baby (yes, Kate is CLEARLY braless and topless in one of the photos). There are certain lines you just don't cross and posing without a shirt or bra on with someone else's baby is gross. Sorry, that's both my professional and personal opinion. As you said though, we all see things differently. What I think is funniest though is that most models that have children would never participate in a photoshoot like this. I'm not allowed to mention the name of other models in Kate's thread so I won't but I can think of 15 other world famous models that all have children and would NEVER consider doing this type of photoshoot. They might do it with their children but they would never do it with someone else's child. Oh my f*** God! Please be my guest & go report my post for bashing if u need to, but I have to say that u are so full of bullshit & pretentiousness! Go back to school to actually learn about fashion photography history! I could give u a long list of famous photographer and fashion (super) models who did that kind of shoot that u find so disturbing. I could give u another list of fashion editorials with naked children posing with models from very famous fashion magazines. I could but i am not going to do it because only a pervert can see perversion onto a picture with a model holding a naked baby onto her (not even naked) chest. u are pathetic dude & Ur mind is gross. To see a picture with a child as it's somewhat something sexual make me think that u have some kind of weird personal issues?