phenobarbie

I doubt it would be a platonic pillow fight, it doesn't seem like half the girls get along very well.

So with the post it do you still wanna bang it.. or use it for bathroom material? Just saying.

Slight Nudity Post it like thing added for your convenience.. Man like pecks, man like hands and a shadow that resembles an overgrown muff. For your personal pleasure. Enjoy the tuck n fold,

I know, I read the blog, I was just stating that so that if anyone else was interested they knew there were other pictures. I'm entirely to lazy to pull apart the magazine myself lol. She looks good though, in all the pictures. /monthly_07_2013/post-17905-0-1446093323-36249_thumb.jpg" data-fileid="3924316" alt="post-17905-0-1446093323-36249_thumb.jpg" data-ratio="108.41">

There are about 7-8 more pictures in the mag of her...

lmao I was just trying to figure out if that had been posted last night because I have a few maybelline clips from the Glamour with Rosie on the cover

She looks good there.

Holy gods yes. I could not agree with this more, I would give anything to have top models more in the spotlight in general, but especially over all these ridiculous reality tv "stars", or the likes of Bieber, Miley, Gomes, Hudgens, Kardashian etc.... I mean top Hollywood actors are one thing, but the others I am sick of.

To bad it's buried.

Then why does one image not have the black border? and another only has a black border along one side.

Honestly it looks like the black borders were part of the actual editorial. If people don't want the black lines they can edit it themselves, there's little to no point in reposting almost the exact same images minus one black line, or a border. The efforts on your part are appreciated, but chances are it was reported as a repost. They're trying to cut down on that in the forum, and high traffic threads tend to get more reports then low traffic threads.

No summer issue, just a party in Vegas. There will be something released later this summer in August.

Sales/popularity will quite probably factor into the "greatest swimsuit model" for sports illustrated. Everyone was relevant at one point. I'm not saying Kate will, or even should be number 1 however to discount her and say that some of the older models deserve the spot more simply because they were in the magazine 10-30 years ago and are "superstars" in an era that catered to models isn't really saying much. The sad reality, is in this day and age most people walking down the street will if asked be able to name current models. Unless they've been following this for years and had a page or two taped to the bathroom wall as masturbatory material when they were 16 they probably wont remember girls like Kathy, or Stephanie, or Cheryl, or Christie. It's nothing against them, but modern society is so focused on the now that they're losing sight of the then.

Jake 1 Jensen 5 Joseph 3 Matt 0 Milo 2

Bullshit, I've been to my mother's house which isn't that slow, but it's far from fast and coming into some threads of Bellazon, this one being one of the scary ones it's almost painful. I don't want to change my settings on bellazon as my connection is fine, but due to the avatar/signatures and gif intensive pages some places just aren't worth coming to if I'm not using my connection. What you consider "shitty" is probably decent compared to many others, but I for one can vouch that some threads on Bellazon are horrible on certain connections. I don't even come to the site on my phone because of all the graphics, not even factoring in the gifs.

Okay, I'm going out on a limb here, and I truly hope you don't take this personally, but are you gay? No insult intended and if you are, not only is that okay it's kind of awesome, but really? You're more drawn to the clothing then to the model? Okay, I can understand some of the models not being your cup of tea, but these women, regardless of how much they are photo shopped are all quite beautiful, each in their own way. I can see the difference between vintage VS and modern VS, but I don't think that that is the intent of the brand to have the eye drawn away from the model and focused on the clothing. They are still trying to brand their new models. Forcing some of these women down our collective throats so we get to know for instance Candice, and the things Candice does. If they just wanted us to see the clothing they wouldn't try to sell us a name. I think it's more a case of Monica and Ed catering towards a certain body type and not taking into consideration what their target audience wants. These women are still trying to sell sex, they just are "falling short" because of the elevated platform so many of us have put vintage VS on. It's not necessarily better or worse, but it's current so it's not as good. It's the collective nothing is good enough unless it's something we don't have. ----------- While this argument has been done to death, the whole idea of unhealthy skinny being better then unhealthy over weight is absolute garbage. Either way is unhealthy. And yes, in the past some of the VS models, have shown signs of being a little to "skinny" to be healthy, and it's made headlines, and had people taking a step back questioning how a brand marketing "sexy" could consider this okay. If you consider yourself underweight that is unhealthy, because their is a natural body weight you should be around based on bone density, height and other factors. By taking that into consideration underweight, by it's very nature is considered unhealthy. As for Kate Upton being more healthy then Karlie Kloss, or vice versa that argument hasn't been thrown out in quite some time, at least not to the point where it should have become a stand point for a debate. The whole point people have been trying to make for the last page or so is that there should be a broad range of the full spectrum of healthy body types. Slender, curvy, bottom heavy, top heavy, whatever your quirk is. Instead it's all these incredibly slender girls, with waif like figures who they then proceed to photo shop weight and or curves onto. If you want curves, hire a damn model with curves, if not then stick with what you have. Chicken cutlets aside, padding aside there are numerous models out there who fit the bill of the fuller figure, Barbara being one of them, Kate being another. They choose not to pick up any women like that, instead sticking with overtoned or petite girls and wondering why the average joe has so much trouble relating to the brand and why their sales are declining. Most people, especially in America are not the size of Candice, or Alessandra, or even Doutzen and Adriana, (both of who are considered their fuller figured models of the brand). They're closer in range to a girl like Barbara, who has that soft womanly curve that is "possible to the imagination". When a woman sits back looking at this lingerie they want to be able to picture themselves in it, and it's hard to relate to women who have no tits or ass, if you're looking down at a full C or D and a booty where one cheek would fit the entire panty of Candice's bottoms. Yes there are girls who are more petite buying the brand, but they aren't the only ones but they seem to be the only ones who are being represented. So personally I look at the argument of skinny vs curvy as having progressed past which is healthier or more unhealthy to something more along the lines of give us both ends of the spectrum, not just one little slice of it. It's like looking into the sky and seeing the red, orange and yellow bit, but having a tree blocking the green, blue, indigo and violet parts of a rainbow. You feel cheated in some way. I for one don't just want my cake, I want to eat it too.

30 seconds of looking on Google image search and I found about 15 images of Edita where the shoulder beauty mark is clearly visible. I don't know what you're looking at slowen, but if it's not a candid 99% of the time skin blemishes and beauty marks will not be visible as they are photo shopped out.

You're pretty derogatory when it comes to models slowen. First Anne V, and now Kate. Who's next?

o.0

That is not twerking.. that is shaking 0.0 x.x

Sleep with Douche #1 - He almost looks like he'd be an ass in the bedroom, a selfish ass, but an ass none the less. Might even get spanked.. Hopefully he's taken enough steroids of some variety that he has trouble getting it up. Extra points if he's so drunk that he doesn't remember and brags the next day. Speak with Douche #2 - He looks like a midget, possibly because of the position, but I want to know where he got his eye brows done, they're pretty sexy. Not to mention he's got soulful eyes; eyes the most striking shade of violet and I want to know if those are a natural shade of eye in the animal kingdom or if he paid/how much he paid for them. Push Douche #3 off a cliff - Because if I can't push em all, I'm gonna push the biggest one? Answered.. now kiss my ass so sleepy Who would you sleep/talk/homicidal shove with?? Christy Teigen Kylie Bisutti Selita Ebanks

Was not talking to you, was clarifying my stance to someone else. Sensitivity is clearly an issue in this thread, holy hell. I don't need to come in here all the time, nor can I handle this thread 90% of the time because of some of the fans here but that doesn't mean I can't point when something has been taken overboard. Just because everyone else here agrees, or doesn't care enough to point out the flaws in someone's behavior doesn't make it right. That would be similar to the whole idea that if your friends and neighbors were jumping off a bridge that it was the right thing to do, In hindsight it's kinda stupid, but hey, if everyone else is going along with it it must be right... RIght?