phenobarbie

Kate Li Valerya Lapidus

KATE LI HELEN POLLAK V ELSA HOSK LEIDY AMELIA VALERYA LAPIDUS

Lente Leidy Sienna Tess

Sure it's "legal" but when we get 7+ reports in a single day expect someone to come in and say something.

This isn't a matter of moving it to another thread it's a matter of members on the forum have reported repeatedly that they're tired of hearing about it. As for your apparent thoughts that Adriana as model is getting special treatment; this exact behavior was what was reported in her thread and was shut down. There is absolutely no reason to speculate about past girlfriends as they have no relevant bearing on his current career. So, unless you're contributing something brand new or you are putting up new pictures that were never posted before there is no need to bring up past girlfriends as that is all said and done and over. As for it being a desert there are lots of things for you to focus on, Leo has a thriving career and there are numerous pictures of him still coming. I’m not sure why we’re not focusing on that. Also, just as an aside, the snarky behavior towards an admin who was simply cleaning up what other members have reported as something they do not want to see it's completely unnecessary. This isn't a gossip rag this is a forum where we look at pretty pictures of models and actors or other celebrities and we talk about their existing careers. Sure, if you're posting old pictures that's completely fine but you don't need to sit there and speculate about past loves again as I said above, it’s over and done with. At the end of the day the admins don't care about what's said or done but when other people find an issue with it then we're forced to come in and to evaluate based on other situations we've come across as to how we want to proceed. If you really want to sit there and gossip about who he slept with or who he's dated take it to PM I'm sure, you'll have a rousing conversation amongst yourselves. So please, let's all be friendly and focus on all the wonderful things Leo has up and coming. He's an incredibly talented actor with a great career and admittedly good taste in women. I'm not sure who he's dating now but I'm sure she's wonderful.

Further name calling will result in bans. Constructive criticism and well thought out debate is acceptable. I do not want to have to delete half a page of content again. Be adults, don't be creeps.

We do not allow fake generated nudes on the forum. Further posting of them will result in modwatch or a ban.

Everyone play nice.

When a photographer or model or any other entity requests pictures taken down and they have the legal right to do so we comply with them. We do not ask for the reason why they want them taken down as it is none of our business and we want to avoid any legal repercussions as much as possible. As such if you are informed that something has been posted that was already requested to be taken down, please comply immediately. Do not argue or try to circumvent the restriction and say that you will send them via PM or other private means. We have multiple fashion insiders that frequent this forum and as such we want to remain respectful to them and the other individuals that they work with. If we simply take down the images as requested and then allow you to insinuate that you will be distributing them in another manner clearly visible within the forum it instills distrust and will result in further takedown requests. Additionally, upon review of this thread it has come to my attention that some people are behaving and speaking of this model in a rather vulgar fashion. 1 - We have minors on this forum 2 - We have fashion insiders on this forum, up to and including the photographer and model of this thread. 3 - We don't need to behave like vulgar pigs who can't respect individuals. You do not need to advertise what you and your hand are doing to the forum. Keep that shit private and keep the conversation respectful. Please refrain from talking about somebody's tits or requesting nudes. This is a fashion form it is not Penthouse it is not Hustler and it is not a pornographic forum. Further behavior such as that will result in warning up to and potentially including mod watch or ban. I'm not just talking about this thread but any other threads that this behavior is brought to my attention.

While we are not prohibiting onlyfans content, please keep look at the banner at the top of the banner regarding which models have requested content not be posted. If a model/photographer has requested paywall content (patreon) not be posted treat it the same as onlyfans.

You can post instagram content so yes that shouldn't be an issue unless she reaches out to request it's takedown.

Ria Dyrdova (awake-mgmt.com) Ria (@iam_valeri_) • Instagram photos and videos

For the time being I will leave the above posts because I do respect people’s right to an opinion. That being said keep it respectful. And the conversation is done. Enjoy the damn pictures; or don’t. I don’t care but enough with the back and forth bickering.

While I appreciate how diligent some of you are in reporting content that is posted on the forum. Unless the photographer, model or publisher is requesting images be taken down those reports will be marked as completed.

We are not able to confirm her age, however it looks like she graduated in Quebec, Canada back in 2016 which would have been grade 11 - so she was probably 16 at that time. Please be respectful of that and do not request older nudes as she may very well have been underage.

Honestly, we don’t do sub forums anymore as it’s not needed. The only reason some of the models still do is because if we merged them the continuity of the parts would be all over the place. But unless something drastically changes no further sub forums for any specific models will be created.

👍

Using an AI to unblur the images isn't illegal or fake. Unless we get a complaint from the model/photographer I don't particularly care but use your best judgment. Obviously they were not released uncensored, whather that is because they are going to be in a publication at a later date or because Jo has requested they be censored I don't know. Just clearly mark that they have been modified.

I for one am humored by whomever had the leaf strung up on them like a country ham. I mean, they found a leaf of that size and it held it's own remarkably well. Honestly though, wtf are these swimsuits? Between the suits and the bad photography these girls barely stood a chance regardless of what they did or didn't bring to the table. I had the magazine early again and I just couldn't be bothered. It's really not worth the time or effort. Hopefully the annual sales are bringing the team joy.

Why do ya'll have to be so damn crude. Seriously, don't be disgusting or you're going on mod watch. I just don't have the patience for this shit anymore.

You're right, the Republicans do shut down most of the "potential reform bills" because they are loaded with so many things that have nothing to do with immigration and everything to do with lining political parties pockets. Kind of like the Covid relief bill that had everything up to and including funding other countries with relief and almost nothing for American citizens. I am a very firm believer of borders and legal immigration is fine, however when you have people "fleeing" their countries due to corrupt regimes, cartels, gang bangers etc and illegally crossing the border you create a problem. The idea is you're coming to America to come for a better life, but when you have no legal process you cannot exclude the problems, which is why they have stated multiple times that it's not just "mommies and their babies" coming across but in fact the cartel and gang bangers and sex traffickers etc. Not only that, but how do you propose to have a better life if you're not following the legal process and you don't have access to the resources available and you're not paying taxes. You have no SSN, no work visa, (so you can only get the lowest end of jobs with very little compensation) and you're forced quite frequently to live in absolutely deplorable living conditions. So by turning a blind eye to the reality we are in fact creating a worse situation for these people. I lived in California in a "not great area" and there were 4-5 households in a 3 bedroom living in shit conditions. Let's not even talk about when I lived in Napa when all of the vineyards were hiring illegals and being crammed into buildings that were completely inhumane. Barely any running water, one bathroom for 25+ people. No privacy, the bare minimum of food and no AC in California in the middle of the summer. YAY! Better life right? That's what happens when you have people circumventing the legal process. They are afraid to report these conditions and so those people that support them crossing illegally for a "better life" are in fact helping to create more "slavery". There is due process for a reason. But hey, it's the same dusty ball and all right? You need to get off your high horse and assume that people only care about "rich white people" because that is the narrative that the left is forcing down everyone's throat. There are more aid packages and resources available for people who are not white then you seem to think. The fact that AP classes no longer follow actual academic levels and have to have "brown and black people" to meet a quota is insulting and brings down the whole education system. What I find absolutely hilarious Dave is that you sit there and saw we need to "come together" and then post this shit. So, is this how you come together? You must have been a riot on team sports in school.

So just to confirm, we should not believe what the sanctuary cities are saying and that sending the very people who they proclaim they want to help to them is wrong? But the border states who have stated they are being overrun by immigrants who have entered the United States illegally should have to deal with them.... because the Democrats said they should? You'd think the Democrats who go on about helping the poor unfortunate immigrants fleeing for a better life would have jumped at the opportunity to help them. But, if what I read was correct they couldn't pass them off to the military fast enough. The idea that people who are not citizens of a country almost have more rights then actual citizens is ridiculous. But thank you, I'm so glad you were able to spell it out for me Dave. I misunderstood the situation. Empty platitudes from the liberal government are okay, but apparently when you are asked to put your money where your mouth is it's not.

I mean, Bush read books to children, Biden smells them. They have some similarities... And you can use the argument that DeSantis took all the democratic sanctuary cities at face value. Didn't they say they would be there to support and help all the asylum seekers given the chance. DeSantis just offered them the opportunity to put their money where their mouth was. To bad they seemed to have forgotten the very things they "stood" for. Not DeSantis' fault that he promised the very things these sanctuary cities said they would do.