Joe > Average

Chrishell Chrishell Emma

Sure thing BabyJude . Glad you like her

*edit from earlier* I meant to vote for the pan and accidentily voted for Magnum (2nd best), but what a mighty good man anyways . But I've got enough grub for all in celebration of the best poll ever .

Magnum, lawd, lawd . I voted for the frying pan though, brotha's gotta eat .

One last thing about babies its funny when I'm watching TV with women I always cringe at the "post baby body" craze on the news. I usually say something along the lines of, 'they're rich of course they can lose weight quick, next story!' and get kicked out of the room . But then baby # 4 and up is definitely bragging rights in any case, even I can't hate then of course... Christy Turlington x3 1.5 Each Doutzen Kroes x3 Emily Didonato x2, Petra Nemcova x1

/ :| Threads Merged....

I honestly can't believe this poll exists .

Yep . Ideally... 1. General front shot that lets members compare top, abs, hips, shape and anything in that area. Preferably no magical bras (to make Miley look like Dolly) if such can be avoided. 2. Bottom pic (mainly because some commented on some not having them last time). Can be either a direct shot or side shot. 3. Leg pic 4. Of your choice Or any other arrangement of your choosing that covers all that of course . You may have 1 pic that covers 2 and 3, 1 for 1 and 2 for 4 ect.

@ you guys . Just a general update, Pheno made a pretty strong case for 4 pics and then donbot's point was great too, so...yeah...I think we should go with that, it should both speed this process up as well as being more space friendly.

I think someone said none can compare to Josie's success for a 32 year old with a kid or something or that's at least how babies ect. came up. BTW, I guess I'm the only one who would be content to not see the word baby on a fashion forum in general ? (unless its in reference to baby back ribs of course). But anyway...ermmm...bump .

As a side note, 10 for Dylan's writing on the song itself... Bob Dylan - 8 Not the best technical voice even in his youth, but his writing and style more than made up for it . Guns n' Roses - 7 Points deducted because for some reaosn the voice is a strange fit for the song, song style and subject matter to me and almost borders on satirical . Much prefer it on their own songs, especially ones like "Paradice City" and even the "Love and Let Die" remake. But 2 points added (from an otherwise 5) for Slash's guitar solo. Original x4 Cover x1

I was ironically not voting to avoid my rounds . But since I'm here... Misa Chien Misa Chien Misa Chien

Good for you. The problem is the introduction takes some of the effect away. If you say, 'Fruit cake is my favorite, I wish they'd add fruit cake to the menu, here's some tell me how you like it' then even if they hate it they eat it with a more uninhibited thought process. But if you way, 'yall don't know nothin' bout no cake, here's some real cake' and give them the fruit cake, instead of just eating the fruit cake the fruit cake then has to live up to higher expectations they now have and then they begin to subconsciously zone in on the cons more than the pros and they then enjoy it even less than they would have otherwise, so in a way you make them like fruit cake less rather than more :morning: .

Sure you may say an unusual torso, long broad face and a combination of haphazard, goofy and precoscious on the runway, but I must say one of the best smiles ever and probably the best in the game atm... 2 .

/ :| @ that story :shock: :| ... I was just about to post, Pheno also suggested that 10 was probably too many pics and I had been thinking the same. What do you guys think about 5 pics... 1. General frontview (making the bosom, abs, hips and general shape clear). 2. Bottom shot, either directly or standing from the side 3. Full view of the legs 4. Whaever you deam to be their best shot or whatever of your choice Actually, lets do it would make this go much faster . And yeah, I'm not good at blocking pics but that example looks perfect to me .

FOURTH PRELIMINARY ROUND, LOT 3 OF 3: 17 Yamila Diaz 18 1.5 Each 19 Ana Beatriz Barros 20 1.5 Each 21 1.5 Each 22 1.5 Each 23 1.5 Each 24 Rebecca Romijn

Daria x3

Awww, there there ladies . I can understand both sides, because whereas I think Doutzen is much prettier and would probably certainly think so if they were just girls at school, on the other hand there is some intangible charm of Josie that makes me like her much more and she just gives me butterflies . But both interpretations are perfectly fine . Doutzen Kroes x3 1.5 Each 1.5 Each Olga Kurylenko x3

The 600 was originally because that was the bandwidth lengnth rule of that time, now its 1,050 (so yeah, that would eliminate the two per row I guess ). The average set of blocked pics is about this size . They'll start off going against others in their own groups that I have them in, but the overall premise is for all to go against all and the person with the best win to loss record wins. If 5 are in the first voting round for example, everyone ranks them 1-5 and everyone you place higher or lower than counts to your record as someone you beat or lost to.

Cintia x2 - she always steals my heart and makes me sigh on the runway . Carla x1 - never seen her's before so I hate that the clips were in semi-slow motion, but she held her own, especially with the turns .

5, cute, yummy, smart and funny .

I just wanted to make a few general things clear . 1. On the Premise I just want to make plain that the main objective isn't just to fool everyone, but to make the voters look closer at what's being compared by not focusing as much on other things for the purpose of making the comp more competitive. Whereas before one my vote based on the name, with body only, the hope is even if you figure it out, focusing just that much more on the subject at hand will enhance the objectivity of the decision at least a fraction. And above all some who may not would have had a chance in the scoring portion based on lack of name recognition can moreso blend in here. 2. Issues I'm aware and stillinwonderland brought it to my attention again that the nominating via pm only can confuse some. My remedy is this, A) Know that not many people are nominating (about 4 so far), so the chances the person you want to nominate is already nominated aren't particularly high B) Try to have maybe 4-5 names in mind and that will decrease the chances even further. I know its inconvenient, but that's the best I can do atm. And Pheno and I are finding general pics to speed the process up anyway. 3. What would help... As I said, 'fooling' people isn't the only objective, but as Pretty said SI pics and VSFS pics given its popularity here are probably the biggest giveaway, so if you don't mind, could we maybe go for the same poses in editorials and candids instread? I'm willing to help anyone who has difficulty. 4. On choosing pics Try to incorporate enough of a variety of angles to your pics so that someone seeing them for the first time can judge adequately. Ex. at least 1 front shot from at least the neck to upper thighs, at least 1 full leg shot that lets them see what kind of legs they have, at least 1 bottom shot (can be either facing camera or just them turning to the side if that's all you can find). 5. Advice needed Does anyone have any input as to what the maximum o nominees per round without being cumbersome on the eyes? That is bearing in mind the average blocked set of pics is about 600 x 900. 4 rows of 2? 3 rows of 2? 2 rows of 2? 6. I'm considering this a work in progress atm, but its progressing .

Group C: Mylene Demongeot x3 c Brigitte Bardot x3 Linda Darnell x3 Group F: Gina Lollobrigida x3 Claudia Cardinale x3 1.5 Each

FOURTH PRELIMINARY ROUND, LOT 2 OF 3: 9 Adriana Lima 10 Olga Kurylenko 11 1.5 Each 12 Lorraine Van Wyk voted Andi at first from being too lazy to click the link . 13 Megan Ewing 14 Alina Vacariu 15 Tyra Banks 16 Tori Praver