TheBaronOfFratton

^*SIGH* And wouldn't they have made a great team-up? Alas, with her retirement we'll probably never know... Biker chick chic:

Young Jump No.17, April '10. A little busy for me (ala PINKY! ) - but pretty, regardless:

^Ja - if you want to go play the BIGGERER game icey, I'm all up for that!!!

^I can't see it: 'This video is not available'... Well the great PINK reveal didn't amount to very much, online at least:

Michelle - And I guess what they say is true, Gisele - I could never spend my life with a man like you, Adriana - I could never be your woman. Yfke - I could be yours though. Fernanda - And yours. Heidi - You though - you'd just wear me out...

Another tough match-up. I like both films a lot; but in terms of onscreen chemistry (if that's what we're voting for? I'm still a little unsure... ) it can only be Ingrid Bergman and Bogie. Not that what I say will amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world! Bergman/Bogart - (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) Kelly/Cooper - (Y) (Just 'cos Grace is so beautiful. )

What gives - I thought Ms. Prinsloo's collection was due out today..? The only new thing I found was this PINK 'heads-up' type thing: I mean, it's lovely and everything - but where are all the Namibian undercrackers???

^The two pictures I posted are in the magazine...

^It's a 12 page spread: 1 page of text and 3 double page spreads. The pictures I posted before (#3630, and have just been reposted - but eagle-eyed Ariesdior was on it straight away) are part of that spread...I don't know about Esquire - but this is the British GQ edition, May '10. I hope this helps?

^CORRECT! Woo-Hoo! It was Morgane all along... :|

^Not Flavia either! ^Aw. I appreciate the visit immensely! No, she's not Asian - and just to speed it up I'm posting a rather freshly waxed image of her in a (hopefully) familiar outfit: ????

Joe - I simply insist on this if it goes any further: On an aside, the blond vulture was my drama teacher at university. FACT!

PINK, hasta mañana( ):

This is more like it!!! Ladies... Alas though, Rox - it's incorrect. Another clue: ???

^No - but would that the pantheon of BZ Gods bless you for continually trying in this otherwise wilderness!

^Not to be too smug - but just got mine this afternoon. WOWSER! Would that I had a scanner...

^Oh goody!Caitriona - How about this outfit, Jennka? Would you give it a go? Dewi - Or this? Oluchi - This too? (It is simple Pretty, sure - but I reckon I'd still go for it.) Heidi - Not so much this...

I know Ekberg's not even in the movie much - and Mastroianni spends more of it with other women(!); but nonetheless it left an indelible impression on a young, overly earnest, Baron! So - (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) (Y) for them...

^icey - the first one is definitely from ELLE(poland) July '06. I remember penny-dreaddfull posted it here, especially for me ( ), some ways back! But then the grumpy 'repost squad' came and had a go at her...

^I don't know - 'horses for courses' maybe??? They were notorious divas, sure (and that may have lessened their appeal outside the industry?); it's just possibly exercise videos, shitty films with William Baldwin, comfy talk-show sofas and reality TV weren't of interest to them... As for me, it's difficult to separate model 'qualities' with personal predilections! I mean it would be easy to say: long legs, freckles, huuuge smile, cute accent, and long wavy brown hair - wouldn't it? But I do take your point about personality, Joe. Like Jules Winnfield said: Personality goes a long way! But I think this is what lifts a model you can like professionally, to personally. For instance, there are a couple of high-profile 'Angel' sorts that - while very attractive - have to be (or at least come across as) two of the dullest women you could wish to meet ( ). Alternatively, there may be some 'beachy' type who's physical appeal might be lost on me - but seems like a game girl!

^They're also both 'All-American' US girls - and erred more towards swimsuit/lingerie, as opposed to to the catwalks of Paris and Milan. Linda, and Naomi particularly, had greater modelling longevity and were the darlings of the HF crowd.Infact I saw Linda in a hair product advert on TV yesterday. She still gets beauty contracts! Though who would I rather buy a sofa off of? Well Cindy or Tyra would be the better salespeople, certainly. Maybe it's just in them as part of some national psyche?!!

^All in all, it's just a good job Chelsea are such an eminently likeable team - full of good sports and role models for the kids. (Y)

Whatever the hair colour... (edited for extra red dress action too...)

Well, since it's THE question everyone is asking ( !) - and since ImageShack seems to have temporarily mislaid my first clue - here's another clue: ??

It's quite difficult to judge the relative skills of the 'classic' actresses, as acting styles have changed so much. Nowadays some of the melodrama of, say, Vivien Leigh would look out of place - hammy even! I dare say, that in another fifty years or so, some people might go as far as to think that Paris Hilton can't act. Crazy! I mean - can you imagine? How DARE they?!! Stoopid future people. As for great current actresses, I have to say Julianne Moore. Some actors/actresses turn out one great performance in their career. They get a lot of plaudits, maybe win some awards, the OSCAR even - and people forget the rest of the twaddle they've been in... Julianne Moore pulls it out of the bag all the time (bar 9 Months - the exception that always proves the rule!) and is well overdue for some weighty recognition.