Posted August 11, 200618 yr I would like to register a half question/half complaint about the nudity policy.Just yesterday, I posted this image for which I was admonished for posting nudity without a text link warning:Exhibit 1But, there are plenty of examples of similar images being posted without a text link and without the poster being warned. From the "B & W photos: are they sexy or what?" thread:Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3It may be argued the lack of butt crack makes them acceptable with no warning. But in the same thread, we find these:Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5And perhaps, most confusing of all, this one made it into the "Nice Back!" thread with no warning:Exhibit 6Please explain why that last picture (Exhibit 6) is okay, while the one I posted (Exhibit 1) isn't. I understand nipple and groin stuff is out, but why is some bare bottom stuff allowed, and others aren't? Warning. Links may or may not contain nudity, based on the consensus from this thread.
August 11, 200618 yr I thought maybe its the b*ttcr*ck , but that doesn't seem to be the case either, seeing your other exhibits.... hmm..... I wonder what is the criteria... :lost:
August 11, 200618 yr maybe the mods/admins haven't seen those pics when they were posted... but anyways i think the butt nudity thing is stupid because there's not much difference between a naked butt and a butt with a thong
August 12, 200618 yr For the final time, no buttcracks = not nudity, so that answers Exhibit's 2 and 3. I think Exhibit 4 and Exhibit 5 were posted before the staff decided to clamp down on the posting of nudity. Exhibit 6 was to be linked but was overlooked. Thanks for pointing it out.
August 12, 200618 yr Author no buttcrack = not nudity sounds silly to me, but now that I know the rules, I'll do my best to follow them.
August 12, 200618 yr You of all people should understand that bare bottoms is considered to be nudity in the U.S.
August 13, 200618 yr maybe the mods/admins haven't seen those pics when they were posted... but anyways i think the butt nudity thing is stupid because there's not much difference between a naked butt and a butt with a thong I totally agree ... we're allowed to thumbnail (or wtv else) bare butts as long as the girls are wearing string between their cheeks. Thongs/g-strings are pretty nude if you ask me.... I think it's funny
August 13, 200618 yr Author You of all people should understand that bare bottoms is considered to be nudity in the U.S. I do know that. What I think is silly is that if the photographer were standing 5 degrees to his right in the first pic, it wouldn't count as nudity, since it would look more like the second pic. I also think the attitude toward nudity in the US is silly. Butts aren't genitals, and you can show a woman being gang raped on TV, but Janet Jackson's nipple must be abolished. Why can't we be more like Europe? Ok, I'm done with my rant.
August 13, 200618 yr ...Why can't we be more like Europe? because you suck ? j/k but yeah i'm amazed by how butts are a big deal...
August 13, 200618 yr ...Why can't we be more like Europe? because you suck ? j/k but yeah i'm amazed by how butts are a big deal... So what's the boob policy? Frontal is a no-no? Or is more than just frontal off limits? I feel we need to know this stuff.
August 13, 200618 yr nipples must be covered by fingers/hands, hair, flowers, stickers... you name it... make sure both are covered. I think that also happens to be funny too... cleavage is ok as long as the puppies noses aren't peeking.
August 14, 200618 yr I do know that. What I think is silly is that if the photographer were standing 5 degrees to his right in the first pic, it wouldn't count as nudity, since it would look more like the second pic. I also think the attitude toward nudity in the US is silly. Butts aren't genitals, and you can show a woman being gang raped on TV, but Janet Jackson's nipple must be abolished. Why can't we be more like Europe? Ok, I'm done with my ra nt. Personally, I agree with you but that's our policy and we are sticking to it.
August 14, 200618 yr nipples must be covered by fingers/hands, hair, flowers, stickers... you name it... make sure both are covered. I think that also happens to be funny too... cleavage is ok as long as the puppies noses aren't peeking. I love your analogies.
September 8, 200618 yr Author Qball is getting away with it again. He posted a version of Exhibit #1 in the Nice back! thread without text-linking. The very same picture I was warned for! It's been up for 4 days. Think of all the children that could have seen that! The best backside in the world - out in the open for everyone to see! For shame!:knives:
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.