Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

I've been hanging out for this one ever since the first one, which is a LONG time. Can't wait!

  • Author
On 22/05/2014 at 2:16 PM, Shepherd said:

Posters

 

36a7dc328087522.jpg 11b5a1328087571.jpg

 

Thanks Shep. I understand Eva Green's poster was recently banned by the MPAA for being a bit too 'risque'... :laugh:

 

Nudity(ish)

 

Spoiler

post-20523-0-16647800-1401554391_thumb.j

 

What's that? In 3D, you say? :Angel:

 

  • 2 weeks later...

I rewatched the original (theatrical cut) for the first time in about 7 or 8 years, and I'd forgotten about how it ended. Was like watching for the first time again! So good!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Author

A new 'red band' trailer just landed. It's a bit longer than the previous two, with narrative threads seemingly connecting the prequel and sequel elements of the movie. :hehe:

 

Cool .. Sin City's most hard-boiled citizens cross paths with some of its more reviled inhabitants.

Honestly, without Carla Gugino :heart:  (RIP Lucille), I have less interest in this one.

 

post-72476-0-1446103455-93628_thumb.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

It was a disappointment. Only some of the segments with Dwight and Ava worked for me.

I found the entire "original" JGL segment underwhelming.

 

Part of the problem is that the visual style, which was groundbreaking at the time, has now been used in many other films, amongst them both "300" films.

  • Author

Given that the first film came out over a decade ago, the visual style still looked remarkably fresh to me. I can't say the same about the material, though. The additional plot threads felt second rate, as if Miller just had them lying in a drawer somewhere. Eva Green is always a joy to watch, but the overall thrill has gone or at very least diminished. :(

I didn't see it, but to my understanding the first film took all the best stories from the serials.  The rest of the content was not nearly as striking when I last reviewed it.

I didn't see it, but to my understanding the first film took all the best stories from the serials.  The rest of the content was not nearly as striking when I last reviewed it.

 

The best issue not used was "A Dame to Kill for". Which is probably also the best section of the second film.

I do think this would have found more of an audience if they had started pre-production on the sequel immediately after the first film.

Had this gotten a 2007-2008 release, even if it was not any better than the finished product we got this time around, it would have still been able to ride the coattails of its predecessor.

By waiting nine years, any residual excitement for a follow-up had dissipated.

 

I honestly thought even "The Spirit" was a better film than the Sin City sequel, and it's not like I rate that movie very highly.

^

 

Yeah true.  Back then Jessica Alba was still a movie star...'-p

 

The "Spirit" fiasco sank Frank Miller for a few years. IIRC he was also caught with erratic behavior- an offshoot of success probably.  That may be a big reason why Sin city 2 took so long.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.