Schemer Posted December 10, 2019 Posted December 10, 2019 Dude, don't be mad because someone doesn't worship your celebrity crush. Quote
Ramsfan Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 Charly Jordan looks better in the pictures. Quote
Grievous Posted December 16, 2019 Posted December 16, 2019 1 hour ago, sexyatheist said: If you don't like Rachel's new hair, just get the fcuk out of here! I guess I will until it grows back. Quote
SympathysSilhouette Posted December 16, 2019 Posted December 16, 2019 I like her cute short hairstyle. But if she is going to start using wigs in some shoots now, perhaps use less cheap ones? Quote
Sensual Posted December 16, 2019 Posted December 16, 2019 The second issue is out. I love the the armed forces shoot, previously I wasn't really hyped about Alvin's work. The one thing about is the awful color his pictures have, not a fan of them at all. Robert's work is quality as usual though. Amberleigh's shoot was great. Quote
JHP Posted December 16, 2019 Posted December 16, 2019 Anyone notice that she pretty much has one look or stare? Not hating just some observations. You notice it when you look at entire shoots, she makes the same face, no emotion. Heidi, Cindy and lots of very successful models have and show emotion in their shoots. Again, not trying to be mean. She is killing it in life and career, only an observation. Quote
OOTW Posted December 16, 2019 Posted December 16, 2019 IMG_2340.mp4 IMG_2342.mp4 IMG_2341.mp4 IMG_2343.mp4 IMG_2344.mp4 IMG_2345.mp4 IMG_2346.mp4 IMG_2347.mp4 IMG_2348.mp4 IMG_2349.mp4 IMG_2351.mp4 IMG_2350.mp4 IMG_2353.mp4 IMG_2352.mp4 Quote
OOTW Posted December 18, 2019 Posted December 18, 2019 IMG_2707.mp4 IMG_2708.mp4 IMG_2710.mp4 IMG_2709.mp4 IMG_2711.mp4 IMG_2712.mp4 Quote
SympathysSilhouette Posted December 20, 2019 Posted December 20, 2019 The wigs she's been using since she shaved her head are terrible. Quote
Joe'sCat Posted December 20, 2019 Posted December 20, 2019 Seems like she's fully embraced topless via WTVR. Might as well! Pay the surgeon back! I see there's masked-for-content elsewhere . . . . I'd pony up $15 for a good look behind that - if it is a good look, and not that "enough to imagine" teases we've seen here and there. Yep, I'm being blunt about it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.