Enrico_sw

She's cute, but she sure seems weird! Like here, she's got a dead midge on her nail and she calls it nail art... https://www.instagram.com/p/Clo3daNthwz/?hl=en I read two or three comments and I see what I dislike in the modern world: there are lots of simps who praise everything she does, just cause she's cute. So, of course, she'll have mediocre behaviours if everything she does is validated. This is even worse when it happens with average (or even ugly) women... it shows how desperate some young men are.

It's interesting! I don't exactly see the spirit of FF7 in this (including the music that's probably too pessimistic), but this is nice.

Elitism was good. They chose models with super genetic, but they also had to have a discipline: eating, sports (to get tonic and firm bodies), moving their bodies in spaces, transmitting emotions. These women were deserving and worthy of attention. Socialism in modelling is a result of neo-feminism. Just like harsh capitalism for men in romantic relationships is a result of neo-feminism. Their views of the world is to protect the precious eggs at all costs, whereas abundant "swimmers" are scorned and must do exceptional things to exist in their eyes. Socialism for women makes a lot of them lazy. Not just models. Statistically, this increases the number of mediocre women (specially younger women), who have high expectations and low willpower, while lots of young men are discouraged by the disproportionate efforts they got to bring for disappointing results. I'm pretty sure this is highly unsustainable and this won't last long. The cost to pay for those who got fooled by this will probably be high though.

Victoria Bogoslavtceva, 9 January 2023

Version femina, France, 9 January 2023

Emilia Bernet, February 2023

Prima magazine, France, February 2023

And once again... none of my points where addressed. You didn't watch the video of the teacher calling out CRT's malpractices... This is how these theories can keep existing, when some people either get drawn in fallacies or don't want to look at facts, at what's really happening. Also, putting words in other people's mouths to refute them seems to be a classical technique of woke followers

Remember Stalinist trials? People had to plead guilty for crimes they never committed. But hey, who cared? It's for "the cause", right...

I am not these people. You are talking to me, not them. Amalgamating people in the category "they don't think like me, so they're all the same" is a way of impoverishing the debate.

In that respect, you should read Maus and other books about totalitarianism: like Hannah Arendt's, which criticizes both nazism and comunism (that use similar techniques). Wokism is a new avatar of Stalinism.

CRT has a lot to do with totalitarian ideologies.

Straw man argument. Maus is an interesting comic. I have never talked about banning it. You just invented this.

We have never been as divided as we are since these woke ideologies spread everywhere (circa 2018). So, is it really worth it? What do they bring except hatred and the end of nuanced debates?

I gave many examples. Have you listened to the teacher that thoroughly explains what happens in her school with CRT? This is very concrete

Teaching about the Holocaust is extremely important. If you actually read history books about nazism, you'll see the proximities between Woke tactics and their propaganda. In books about Goebbels and Gramsci, you'll find very interesting themes. Nazis and communist propaganda are extremely similar. The tactics is to bring fuel for division and call anyone that wants to bring nuance an extremist. Woke ideology is bad news for the world. History has shown this multiple times.

You will not address my points either. I put the subject on the table first, yet you deflect and bring points I didn't bring.

No, you are not. You are inventing things I never said. What I wrote is very concrete if you actually read it...

Read what I wrote. This is not about the Holocaust or Ruby bridges. This is about "assuming everything is racist" and asking for kids to apologize for their skin color.

If you want to defend your theories, be more thoughtful, more factual, more peaceful, less "ad personam" attacks. You used to be smarter before you went on a path to defend woke theories.

When people realize that the woke nonsense can't be rationally defended, they invent straw man arguments...

No. Stop putting words in my mouth. I have never said that. These sophisms are extremely cheap. Read what I write, don't invent things.

CRT, wokism and all these theories are molded from hatred. Did the world get more peaceful since their spreading? No. Quite the opposite. Look at the discussions here, we used to be more peaceful and friendly before the Woke sect spread its fuel for hatred.

Look at facts. In details. Look at the Grievance study affair, Jon Haidt's work on American universities, what happened to Bret Weinstein at Evergreen, etc.

If school board ban a theory that says "the basic tactics are to assume racism is everywhere every day", it's great. This is fuel for hatred. Bullying small children and telling them that their skin color is a problem is fuel for disaster. CRT is promoting segregation.