Enrico_sw
Members
-
Joined
Everything posted by Enrico_sw
-
Hatred is increasing in the West and woke ideologies (CRT, neo-feminism, the gender confusion...) are the prime reason. Woke supporters are less and less capable of critical thinking -
You can't see the forest for the trees. Who cares if some random trolls on the internet complained about a comic? There are lots of morons on the planet, they have zero influence. Journalists, teachers and professors have influence. This teacher (like many others) explains factually that at school, teachers are told "the basic tactics are to assume racism is everywhere every day" (it's a quote, check it for yourself - at 7:45). This is fuel for hatred. Why is it so hard to understand? Why is it so difficult to criticize something that comes from the woke movement? The inability to criticize a movement is the mark that society is on a totalitarian drift.
-
Emotion and reason are both important. Traditionally and instinctively (it's wired in our hormones), men tend to have stronger rational thinking and weaker emotional thinking. It's the opposite for women. But today, where the feminine logic is celebrated, it's very imbalanced, people are too emotional and way less rational. This unbalance is true for both men and women. But I ramble on again....
-
The model that SI used to choose (before the downfall) were exceptional. Beautiful faces (eyes, smiles, etc.) and perfect bodies (ver fit with usually bosoms shaped like stately mountains)... Like Kate Upton, Lauren Mellor, Hannah Ferguson... These women are legends (and all of them have sweet personalities too). It seems like MJ Day has become woke as fuck (I know I talk a lot about "wokism", but it's because this American sect has ruined so many things I used to love: sexy women, series, movies - especially SciFi like Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. - and now they're assaulting the gaming industry). I have anger against this woke sect, mixed with rational thinking that makes me conclude that very bad things will happen to mankind because of this sect. It does ressemble what happened in 1917 or 1933. All the great things that the West has spent years to build (between 1950s and 2010s) is being destroyed by a sect of spoiled children created to by sweet times. Sweet times create weak men... who create hard times. Round and round it goes, I guess
-
@Joe > Average Do you know this account on insta? https://www.instagram.com/ihypocritical/?hl=en Sometimes they talk about the same subjects as Clown World, but it's sadder here... (like the story of the de-transitioned ex-navy SEAL, really sad story).
-
I love puns, full metal alchemist is one of my favorite animes and I like green eyes like Neta Alchimister's. Which reminds me that I hadn't listened to this song for a long time! Clown world is still alive on twitter https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_
-
-
-
Wokeness is a dangerous totalitarian poison, because it takes 5 seconds for someone to say "oh, my concept is for the good guys" and fool many people. But it takes hours and hours of explanations, evidence-based analyses, rigorous thinking to debunk the lies in these ideologies. In the "long run", reasonable people will understand. But it might be too late.
-
@SympathysSilhouette Si ton français est assez bon, je te conseille ce livre de Michel Onfray. Excellent trilogue (fictif) entre Eichmann, Kant et Nietzche. https://www.amazon.fr/songe-dEichmann-Précédé-kantien-nazis/dp/271860767X Michel Onfray explique comment la philosophie kantienne (l'impératif catégorique, mais pas uniquement), très présente en Allemagne, mais aussi plus largement en Europe, fournit des outils de collaboration à des idéologies totalitaires. Le wokisme est l'une des menaces totalitaires les plus importantes du monde actuel.
-
Hannah Arendt, Jon Haidt, Bret Weinstein and others against all kinds of crazy totalitarian moguls:
-
If the knowledge you learn at your "post-modern" university is not filled with critical thinking, falsifiability and evidence based views, then:
-
There are two Hannahs to remember: - Hannah Arendt: great philosopher whose studies of totalitarian movements is essential (it's important to read it today, as new forms of totalitarianism - like Wokeness - have emerged) - Hannah Ferguson: model with one of the best smile and body I know. And they both have a song:
-
Do you remember Hannah Arendt's critics of the infiltration of totalitarian soaked ideas in social sciences? This is highly valuable knowledge. Based on evidence and thorough critical thinking.
-
Everybody could benefit from reading history books about cultural propaganda in the 20th century (both Gramsci and Goebbels are two extremely important figures to read to understand what propaganda is and how it can infiltrate the university). Look at what Heidegger did in the 30s and 40s. He was one of the best intellectuals of his century. Look at what he did.
-
It's not because something is repeated on CNN, MSNBC and by "professors" in Evergreen or Yale that it's true. You gotta remember what happened to Bret Weinstein at Evergreen. Social sciences in American Universities are ailing. It's ideology there, not science. They don't want sane debates, falsifiability or dissenting opinion. That's not science (I have studied science in quite a good environment, this is NOT it).
-
Jon Haidt (one of the most brilliant social psychologists) explains the dangers of unethical and untalented social sciences in American Universities.
-
The "grievance studies affair" brilliantly (and scientifically) illustrated the poor value of the knowledge behind these grievance theories (CRT, gender studies, etc.)
-
Not your best argument If something is studied in universities, it doesn't mean it's true (especially in social sience). Far from it. It's not maths. It's not physics. It's not even biology (a "hard science" with still lots of uncertainties, because life is complex). Social sciences are easy to falsify, highly normative. The "knowledge" behind CRT is worthless, because it's not evidence-based, it's ideological.
-
Is it me or she's got a super long neck?
-
Back when SISE was still a great thing... But they say all good things must come to end Why? Who knows...
-
It's like neo-feminists saying that the fight for "equality", while in reality they fight for their own privileges and hatred towards men (of course, that's not "all feminists", but most of the influent neo-feminists). Also, "equality" can designate two radically opposite concepts: - equality of opportunity (which was the noble fight in the 18th/19th centuries) which promotes justice and a fair chance for everyone - equality of outcome which is a horrible concept that finds its roots in the most profound injustices, hatred and despise for mankind (which was the despicable fight that destroyed many countries, including Russia).
-
The definition you gave is the cover-up that CRT proponents use. There is no textbook definition, because it's not a science. It's an ideology. CRT is a racist theory, made by racists who are obsessed with race and use "reverse racism" (which is racism) to justify more racism and hatred. Of course, they will say they fight against racism, but the truth is that they are the biggest spreaders of racism. You gotta assess what CRT is based on what its cult followers do, not based on the "good guys" label they self-attribute.
-
