Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

breeconden.com is now the first result on google (Y)

FUCK!!!!! she's still there! that person is using my scan! i have to tell her agent.

some scans

post-255-1132904735_thumb.jpgpost-255-1132904765_thumb.jpgpost-255-1132904786_thumb.jpg

post-255-1132904807_thumb.jpgpost-255-1132904825_thumb.jpgpost-255-1132904844_thumb.jpgpost-255-1132904864_thumb.jpg

i had some help on the last 4, my scanner doesnt like dark colors <_<

Bree looks so much better outside of the Guess Ad's . She's Beautiful. :wub:

Bree looks so much better outside of the Guess Ad's . She's Beautiful. :wub:

agreed :yes:

thank you neo :blush:

there are more from the first set, 2 more but im not allowed to scan those....thank god they are two pagers and the magazine is big so i have to scan twice for one page

because they dont want it on the website...so i wont scan them.

they dont want to pass of bree like that, thats why...they didnt like her posing in the pictures....there were 5 pictures in total two of them said not ok, please dont scan....i didnt scan.

I'm still not following. What was bad about the pics? Was it the content (i.e. nudity) or did they just not like the way she looked in them?

they didnt like the way she looked in them

i.e.... the posing.

then why were the pics published in the first place??? :huh:

As far as I know, they don't get to pick what's put in the magazine.

are these pics being published to the public?

They already have been in Item magazine with Rachel Leigh Cook on the cover.

maybe i need to get it and do it myself

these "folks" have done absolutely nothing to help us with the site...just asking us to take stuff off.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.