You do realize that the magazine has always had female editor right? There's more to SI than tits and ass, hence why not every hoochie looking model can make it to SI. So if the sex of the editor was the issue, the magazine would have gone to shit 51 years ago and it didn't. "Gone to shit" is very subjective. I think it has. In my opinion the swimsuit issue jumped the shark when "they" put Beyoncé on the cover in 2007. From all the numbers I've been able to find, SI readership is roughly 80% male. This would lead me to believe that men might want to have a say in what they're paying for. Or we might stop paying for it. "Hoochie looking" is even more subjective. This isn't Debutante Monthly. Give SI some hoochification and clean house on some of these played-out models. The informal poll I took passing the issue around while watching hoops with my buddies last weekend concluded in general that: - Hannah Ferguson, Jessica Gomes and Sara Sampaio are hot - Genevieve Morton, Irena Shayk and Ariel Meredith are hot, but they're stale - Emily Ratajokowski is a bangn' body butterface - feelings were mixed on Nina Agdal - the rest of the girls are weird/awkward looking - and Crissy Teigen is downright fugly. So there you have it. From the mouths of beer-drinking, sports-watching dudes. We don't want to have anything to do with fireman calendars or the Better Homes and Gardens swimsuit issue, but give us this.