Ilovehotties89

Yeah, but it's fewer and farther between. I'd love to see her in a new Lounge photo shoot. She's my favorite for good reason.

Despite having a couple of attractive ladies, this issue is a shitshow. Why does MJ think that "diversity" is just a code word for fat, ugly, eyesore? Meg the Horse and the rest of the buffalo belong in the livery stable. Another thing that annoys me is how they put the fatties and uggos in the more skin/less coverage suits while they put the few hot girls in the ugly less skin/ maximum coverage outfits. Now, because I don't want this post to be nothing but complaints, here are several suggestions to return to SI's former glory. 1. Fire MJ and replace her with a red-blooded, heterosexual man. 2. No more pot-bellied porkers. 3. Ditch the shitty one pieces and diaperkinis. 4. If you insist on "diversifying", take your time and pick only the best of the best. Tinashe looks good, but I tefuse to believe that she's the only attractive black woman out there that could have been picked. What about Mariama Diallo? Shake things up a bit. How about a Pro-Am shoot where you pair up past models with some of Hollywood's hottest? Imagine a Danielle Herrington/Zendaya Coleman, Alexandra Daddario/ Christen Harper, Kate Upton/ Sydney Sweeney, Olivia Culpo/Victoria Justice, and Emily Ratajkowski/Nina Dobrev shoot. THAT would get a lot of good attention. 5. Bring back body paint on world class beauties. 6. Remember that the SI is SUPPOSED to feature fantastically beautiful women, not women I can pick up at my local bar.

She's a hottie for sure.

What is her Insta? I'd be interested in reading her comments and concerns myself.

Good Lord, she's a GODDESS!

I'm not interested in any of the questionable shoots she may have done, but I would be interested in hearing the criticism of some of the people she works with.

I haven't bought an SISE in years, and looking at the recent trends I don't see that changing anytime soon. The SE was supposed to be about celebrating beautiful women for beauty's sake, but the morons who run it have gone the opposite way. Now, we get oldie, ugly, and fatty in the magazine with one or two genuine hotties. Even then they take the rare good looking chick and put her in the most frumpy, ugly, unappealing outfits imaginable. I don't understand what happened to my formerly beloved SE. SMH.

She's beautiful beyond words.

Great Googly Moogly. She's a goddess.

Doesn't that defeat the purpose of lingerie in the first place? Whenever my exes ever dressed up for me, they might have been uncomfortable, but they never had their outfit on for very long. Being sexy is the whole point. I agree about Taylor's short hair. She looks sexy as fuck. Damned if she isn't climbing up the ladder in my personal rankings.

You make a great point. VS hasn't been a sexy brand for a while now. Despite having some of the most stunningly beautiful women working for them, and a great marketing/advertising team, they are incredibly boring style wise.

I don't know why she waited until now to bring the heat, but God bless her for it.

Nice set of hooters on that girl.

She's a goddess. Must be something in the water over in Straya. Between her, Steph Rayner, and the Herbert Twins, a good number of my favorites come from down under.

Why is she dressed like a frumpy, 45 year old housewife? What happened to her?

I can't tell if she had any other work done. She does her makeup in a completely different style than she did pre boob job. I will say that her current look is just ridiculously sexy, fake boobs and all.

Christ, $79!? She sure loves bilking chumps out of their money eh?

She is just beautiful.

She is a smoking hottie!

She's not a natural beauty like Steph Rayner, but for sheer hotness, she's near the top of the list.

Nah, I'm just bullshitting. The odds aren't in my favor anyway.

She is INCREDIBLY HOT!!

I've seen no evidence that she isn't.

The difference for me is I'm not paying money out of pocket to see hotties like Charly. She is incredibly hot, but I wouldn't pay to see her on OF. Or anybody else for that matter. I mean no offense, just speaking my piece.

Christ. I've bever spent a single thin dime on OnlyFans and I never will. Why on earth would I pay just to see photos of a hot girl that I can't touch? It'd be like going to a steakhouse and paying for a photo of a delicious ribeye that you can't eat.