Sensual

She has only one expression.

People mature differently, some people much younger than others. I know plenty of people are have been married and have had children since they were 18. And in some countries you can drink at this age, vote, and consent. Regardless, as somebody else many models already did nudity at 18. At 18 you're an adult, you can speak for yourself and make decisions on your own, that is all I can say.

The only thing that matters at this point is whatever troubles she was going through years ago, are now gone, and she has gotten back her feet and found something she wants to do.

Imma break the ice. I found this picture of Alexina Graham at the VS Fashion Show in 2017, and I just want to appreciate how beautiful her outfit was.

Add her to the new "on the edge of being anti-vaxxer" train along with Doutzen. Shame...

Looking amazing as always with this new campaign.

I literally got no idea what she is talking about, either the dutch government is pretty bad or something else, but the CDC does recommend vitamins you can take to help your immune system as a precaution, but obviously the CDC is not saying its going to prevent you from getting the virus.

I have the magazine and can confirm they wimped out. Oh well the rest of the shoot is pretty good. That's just how thing sometimes happen. Somebody has to be offended for some ody whether they like it or not

I only count 3, I really wonder who you think are out of shape. If you going call the other ones out of shape, you gonna have to call people like Barbara Palvin and Lorena Duran fat. Get over yourself man.

But 50% of the women are not overweight.

2020-08-03 17-48-16.mp4 A thing I made in an hour

I don't get the criticism for not being a "real" model. Yeah she's not model, but thats all the more reason to applaud her ability to achieve interesting posing and expressions. You know she didn't really have to put that much effort.

wat

Well that is just how it goes with a magazine that would normally be some kind of personal project of a photographer, but instead it was created by a corp. The corps can only see short term, and that leads to the people like MJ being screwed over and pushed into making bad or worse decisions.

I got the issue in the mail today, and this is a fragile sorry excuse for a print magazine. Cheap as hell and depending on the mail carrier you have will probably disintegrate the moment they put it into your mail box.

The videos are way better than any of the pictures by a long mile. My only grip with them the videos look like they didnt really do much as far as color grading went and many of them are too dark.

If they wanted a bald woman they should have cast Vendela Lindblom, but even then I'm not sure if its a good idea to cast a bald women in a sunny beach environment then completely screw up the midtones to where its like I dunno I got nothing against the model, just kind of jarring.

The final thing I will say is... Bring back Barbara Palvin...

Because usually in VS catalog shots she is a lot more expressive than in this shoot, and yes a bad photographer can totally make a model be her worst, but perhaps it is Josephine in this instance.

Robin's set is alright, but no where near as good as the previews. it appears Robin Holzken was too sexy, so that had to tone down the shoot and exclude all the shots that showed it,

This is really on the photographers end here. I don't see what is mediocre about Josephine, there are certainly many better models however.

Josephines shoot is disappointing. They're glorified catalog shots. Why did they even hire Kate Powers. EDIT: Valentina's shoot is actually quite gorgeous, though the big glaring issue is nothing wrong with the photographer, but Valentina's lack of range really shows in these.

I'd hardly call 160-200 dollars affordable, I mean but maybe they could be using top of the line material, and dont break on you after 3 months are well worth that price. I dont know.