TheBaronOfFratton

Part 2:

^Perhaps our influence is far reaching (or, more likely, someone noticed their mistake!) as it's already been rectified. Those pictures (which were of Camille Rowe) have been removed from her portfolio. New NEXT(UK) catalogue, 'Casualwear':

^I guess I will (although simply stating "end of discussion" when it suits you isn't exactly how such things work!), as it's fruitless to continue with somebody who has singularly failed to address either of the points I was actually arguing with you about - and, instead, is determined to erroneously focus on the right of "personal" opinion (which I agreed with anyway) whilst simultaneously making sweeping statements about what "everybody" likes and doesn't like!??

^Must be the environment then... I think the blame lies with processed foods, and estrogenic compounds in the water supply. Either way the abundance of 5ft 11in 10 year old boys with breasts should be cause for concern for the locals?

^I applaud your thorough empirical research and it's resulting statistical proof...You can say "majority" all you like, just DON'T say "all", because it's wrong: I'm a man and you don't speak for me. That's my point. ^Nor would I do so, and I never have here.If you see a "little 10 yr old boy" when you see Behati though, then I suggest there's something amiss with your eyesight or the kids in your environment. I'm in no way saying you should like her in any sense, or "change that" as you say - but I do baulk at this description and what you're implying: Behati looks like a 10 year old boy I like Behati Ergo - I like 10 year old boys I trust you don't mean this? <_<

Thought you all might find this amusing too: I'm not sure how much of a relationship Behati has with her Spanish agency View (and vice versa), but I'd have thought putting up pictures of a totally different model in her portfolio would mean someone's head should roll!

^That picture is just plain adorable! More new VS:

^I do not keep "bringing" Kate Moss up, and I'm fully aware she's not a VS model thank you. I was referring to her being used as an example (by Prettyphile) of being a 'skinny' model and the antithesis of girl's like Kate Upton and Brooklyn Decker which is how this conversation started. So I think you'll find she has a lot to do with this subject if you bothered to actually read it. Talking of which, I never said "all men desire" her - rather I was pointing out how you seem very keen on saying "all men" like curvy models and I was pointing out that "all men" don't. "All men" don't like anything - "some men" do! I also said her refreshing personality had a lot to with her attraction as much as her looks - which you've just chosen to completely ignore and actually use to argue against me. I JUST MADE EXACTLY THOSE POINTS?!?! I You've singularly failed to grasp my post. ^Stop saying this kind of thing and I'll back off! You only just said in the sentence before that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and that you're not "speaking for all men" so STOP with these sweeping statements! I am pretty sure that Siemgi doesn't - and, actually, I don't either! ^I'm not arguing about who sells more lingerie: curvy or skinny; that's not my concern. This kind of claptrap is though. It's not "true" they look like 10 year olds and I resent the implications. It might be your opinion (and the only thing I do agree with you is that we all have our own opinions, a point you keep contradicting however) but to suggest that liking these models is tantamount to paedophilia is utter nonsense and highly objectionable. <_<

^HQWorld have added a bunch of these too, there's a lot of overlap (and they're the same size) but these are the extra ones:

^ Well there would be 25% less posts to begin with! And, I guess, it'd just be a succession of VS pictures like it pretty much is on other forums... Not that VS is bad (liking the new lingerie pictures, lovemusic102), just that there is more to her than only that. Look, I'm posting another one now too. A variation of this beach shot again, without all the writing: (Source: VS Facebook)

Lindsay and Lily have been in a GQ spread that's been reprinted everywhere. ^Not only that - but the cover on "The World's Biggest Selling Men's Magazine"™ so that negates that argument! Not that it should matter anyway, as Siemgi rightly pointed out - VS isn't actually meant as fodder for men's mags, it's for selling lingerie to women. ^Again, it shouldn't be about men - but when do you speak for what we all "desire"? Like it or not, Kate Moss (as it is always Kate Moss who ends up as the 'whipping girl' in these arguments) was, and still is, the object of desire for many men. We are not all slavering beasts who can only get our rocks off to 2D 't&a' representations of women - like Jessica Rabbit is the pinnacle of female sexuality for us! I'm not even a particular Kate fan, but she did have oodles of charm and and a disarming way about her which was a welcome relief and a breath of fresh air in the era of the 'glamazons'. Never discount personality when you paint what men want.Besides, there are great swathes of the planet where "little breast" and "flat @ss" is very much the norm. God, it's a wonder there are over a billion Chinese given what men have to procreate with there isn't it?! I don't know if you are, in fact, Jade** reincarnated WildFlower; but you are doing a good job of imitating her?! Your argument it's like "10 year olds modelling for lingerie" is as offensive as it is just plain absurd.

^My only caveat to this is that it's just as unrealistic for women with bodies like Kate Moss to aspire to look like Brooklyn Decker...

Well, it's been a while... Still shooting with Revolve and doing their onsite promos:

Girls playing pool is a "thing" for me too! Jamie at some 'SoCal' pool tournament, HQ:

^ ^Sometimes I should maybe just wait a few days! But I get carried away with new stuff...

Am I missing something here? That link I'd already posted takes you to the post where all the "backstage pre show" shots of Candice are, from the '08 VSFS. That one shot in particular (as well as the rest) is better quality than TKC's and the same as Melocotón's...

^Me too! And looking forward to the catalogue then... Is this it? ^Indeed it is - I knew some technical clever-clogs would be able to stitch them together! Thank you for posting. Pamela Love has finally posted their S/S '12 catalogue today. So here are the shots in higher quality:

^Yes it was - and I agree! The original post was here: http://www.bellazon.com/main/index.php?s=&...t&p=1499525 Don't recall them being reposted in HQ, but maybe somewhere else..?

^Well, you only get half the congratulations as you did at 10... Do some work! ^ You're my new favourite... You can stay!

From Russell James' twitter:

Part 2:

^I don't think she's had anything done (or nothing new, at least! ) - I think a lot of it is the resolution of the pictures... New photo-set, [VYJ] No.116:

'The Buzz on the Red Carpet' presented by QVC HQs, Feb 23rd: (Source: Celebutopia)

^Ah - but aren't we all ultimately, aren't we all..? ^ ^What? This too Savanna - are you trying to push me into narcolepsy?