January 12, 200718 yr both girls are disturbing but judging the covers i must say i like snejana's more because i can actually see how someone might think she's beautiful whereas lily..well i won't go there
January 12, 200718 yr edgy - Snejana (Lily's not edgy enough, would have fit better in original category IMO) original - Lily (I don't find Sne's cover very original ...) natural - They have both too much make-up on to look "natural" for me But I'll chose Snejana cb - I can't chose, both covers are great! I don't want to but my vote goes to Snejana. I adore Lily and love every one of her Editorials, but when it comes to better covers ...
January 12, 200718 yr i adore both girls, but on the basis of those covers i have to go for snejana. she really shines in every one.
January 12, 200718 yr Author Snejana Onopka 24-6 Lily Cole #7 found by the Pilot Adriana Lima vs Natasha Poly found by Thiago Mello edgy VS original VS natural VS clasically beautiful VS
January 12, 200718 yr That isn't a hard choice, right? Adriana! I like her older photo's, so these covers were made then. I love 'em! Cheers! The Pilot
January 12, 200718 yr Author great material for Taben to bashedgy- Natasha of course, did you find edgyness in Adri's cover? me neitheroriginal- DEFINEATLY ADRIANA, it's the most original cover so far, Adriana on the cover wearing something and it's even not lingerie or bikini - it's a Miracle!natural - NatashaCB - I don't like both, actually Natasha's isn't either clasically or beautiful, but i'll go with her3:1 Natasha
January 12, 200718 yr also great material to bash for me Edgy: None. But since a pair of wings, staring dreamy in the nonsense and being nearly naked doesn't make an edgy cover I'll go with Natasha. Original: Laughing Adriana against Natasha in "weird" clothes... What the hell is original about a laugh? And she's partial nude again (I'm disappointed about Natasha's cover too, it's nothing special) Natasha again Natural: the only category in which I like them both. BUT why has Adriana to be naked all the time? Natasha again for not showing most of her boobs. CB: Lol. Would Adriana wear at least on this cover more than underwear - she'd even get this vote. But since she doesn't do anything but boring VS or commercial and this cover isn't classical beautiful (it looks more like "take me please now and here") only "hey I'm in lingerie again" - Natasha again, though that's more a student pretty what she resembles 4:0 for Natasha, smashing result for the dressed girl! to be honest, I'm really disappointed. I had hoped to see more from Adriana's work, but here are only lingeriepics. bad, bad choices or bad, bad model. And I'm disappointed to see these Natasha-covers. They are better than Adriana's, though.
January 12, 200718 yr Edgy: Natasha - How is there anything remotely edgy about Adriana's cover? Original: Natasha - Again, how is there ANYTHING original about Adriana's cover? She just standing there in a dress with her mouth hanging open. And there's really nothing about Natasha's cover that's orginial either, but I like the clothing and pose is a little better.. Meh! /It learns the definition of original! Natural: Adriana :shock: Beautiful: Adriana - Neither?! Overall: um... Natasha I guess Worst covers to vote on ever......
January 12, 200718 yr edgy~ Adrianaoriginal~neithernatural~ Adrianaclasically beautiful~ AdrianaI guess Adriana
January 12, 200718 yr I guess those who vote for Adriana in edgy and original have no idea what those categories mean. Or am I wrong...?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.