Manly Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 gisele was NEVER in SI before. . . and if you ask me -- that is a complete TRAVESTY!!!! really though, let's be serious ---- as far as present day SUPERMODELS who are successful across the board in both high fashion AND commercial. . .there really is noone bigger than Gisele, Karolina, or Adriana. i don't understand WHY they haven't been approached to be in the SI swimsuit issue. . .. and if they HAVE, why on Earth they chose or are unable to do it. I wish Adriana, Gisele or KK was on the cover. why on the cover when they aren't even in the mag. you should be wishing for them to be in the mag, let alone the cover of it first. Quote
ssj_trunks7 Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 I don't think you'll see ale, adriana, gisele or karolina in SI any time soon. it would be too pricey for SI to pay them all. besides you don't need to see them in SI since VS makes their own swimsuit catalogs. you can see them all there. Quote
happycanadian2 Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 ^^^^^^ the VS catalog is different. the poses are all pretty similar . .. it's just not as fun or special. i don't think price comes into it -- i'm pretty sure that KK would do it for free. she definitely has enough money and the exposure could do nothing but GREAT things for her career.i think it must be a stipulation within the VS contract that their particular "Angels" (Gisele, Adriana, Karolina, Alessandra) aren't allowed to do other swimsuit mags. . . but it doesn't make sense to me. anyway, i'm not complaining tooooo much. i LOVED seeing Rebecca and Daniela again. BUT, the pictures were really crappy this time around. the photography was totally BLAH. remember how great the photos were the year Rebecca was on the cover???? "The Not So Virgin Islands". . . .the pictures really reflected the backgrounds and the locales. this time, they're totally boring. Even the issue when Daniela had the cover (2000 i think) and they were photographed all over Greece, those pictures were AMAZING. the photography was off the chain. i was really let down by the SI issue for the past like 3 years. Quote
Jimmy Changa Posted February 16, 2006 Posted February 16, 2006 Anyone plan on scanning Yesica's SI pics?? Maybe starting a thread for her? hmmm? Quote
ssj_trunks7 Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 i don't think its in their contracts that they can't do SI. Heidi Klum and Ana barros beatriz both have contracts with VS and yet they are in the SI magazine. Quote
Scooter Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 yes, Marisa should have at LEAST oneYou're so right Jimmy. I thought it was going to be her year this year. Especially with the two Czech women and Carolyn Murphy getting it the past three years that Marisa's been in it looking hotter and hotter.This year's cover is a bit of a let down for me.I also believe that model's like Gisele, Adriana and Alessandra have clauses in their contracts forbidding them to appear in SI when they have such high prfiles at Victoria's Secret. Quote
Jimmy Changa Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 ana has some hot lookin pics in there fo sho Quote
SympathysSilhouette Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 No more Jessica Van Der Steen either... Quote
chiva474128 Posted February 17, 2006 Posted February 17, 2006 Spike TV SI Swimsuit Special posted in the General Babe Discussion > Motion thread.http://www.bellazon.com/main/index.php?s=&...ndpost&p=346437 Quote
AriesMar27 Posted February 19, 2006 Posted February 19, 2006 this years si was kinda weak, but i was happy to see my wife noemie back.... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.