Jump to content

Featured Replies

At this point, She's not even real anymore. She has used up every kind of possible fillers along with breast implant. Another Kylie Jenner wannabe. :girlbanghead:

 

gettyimages-693280998-612x612.jpg

its really sad that a girl who signed to Elite Model Management 10 years ago isn't a working model able to make a living from it and instead is an influencer.  The industry is dying. Not every model makes it but it seems most models these days need to supplement their income these days with TikTok or YouTube. She still is modeling and signed to:

 

Heffner Model Management Seattle

Stars Model Management San Francisco

 

She is probably direct book. She might still be booking catalog work or just waiting for her contracts to be up. Hope this helps you guys find more images of her.

 

 

^

Rachel is mainly a Onlyfans erotic/naked content creater now.  

4 hours ago, modelknowledge said:

its really sad that a girl who signed to Elite Model Management 10 years ago isn't a working model able to make a living from it and instead is an influencer.  The industry is dying. Not every model makes it but it seems most models these days need to supplement their income these days with TikTok or YouTube. She still is modeling and signed to:

 

Heffner Model Management Seattle

Stars Model Management San Francisco

 

She is probably direct book. She might still be booking catalog work or just waiting for her contracts to be up. Hope this helps you guys find more images of her.

 

 

Dying? It's dead. Many OF creators make more than the biggest supermodels ever did. 

Only kendal jenner comes close and she's not a model only. 

 

Model era is over. 

On 2/11/2025 at 5:39 PM, MitchD said:

Dying? It's dead. Many OF creators make more than the biggest supermodels ever did. 

Only kendal jenner comes close and she's not a model only. 

 

Model era is over. 

 

It's a shame- due to market conditions- that modeling can only be a part-time job for the vast majority now, and even those with careers it is brief..

 

Besides Rachel Cook, there are other established and once successful models (that I won't name here) that have turned to OF and become sex workers/strippers like her in order to make a living.  I doubt any of them would do that if it didn't pay and certainly when they started modeling, in some cases as young as 15, they didn't envision that one day they have to become a sex worker.

 

So many models on BZ were simply born in the wrong era.  

On 2/13/2025 at 3:35 AM, Cult Icon said:

 

It's a shame- due to market conditions- that modeling can only be a part-time job for the vast majority now, and even those with careers it is brief..

 

Besides Rachel Cook, there are other established and once successful models (that I won't name here) that have turned to OF and become sex workers/strippers like her in order to make a living.  I doubt any of them would do that if it didn't pay and certainly when they started modeling, in some cases as young as 15, they didn't envision that one day they have to become a sex worker.

 

So many models on BZ were simply born in the wrong era.  

 

It's also an attitude and social issue. She could make a decent living modelling for swimwear, lingerie and catalogue stuff. She wouldn't make anywhere near as much money though. Adds to that, she seems...let's say immature on a level. The whole van life, then some kind of "community/commune" she was part of. Moving around, dipping out of the magazines she was part of, that doesn't give a professional vibe to any agency I imagine.

29 minutes ago, Franko said:

 

It's also an attitude and social issue. She could make a decent living modelling for swimwear, lingerie and catalogue stuff. 

 

I don't know about that- she was probably rejected too much- not everyone has the right look.  This industry is brutal.. 

 

Yeah, being a far left hippie type didn't do her any favors.

 

I am seeing a model with a great commercial body of work -30 times greater than Rachel Cook, now having to make naked content on onlyfans to make a living, some of which crosses red lines that even pornstars don't do it.

 

There is also a promising model, also with ELITE IIRC, and walked the VS fashion show and is now on Onlyfans getting naked after her career tanked.

 

It seems overall that these models need to find another, more realistic and stable career than modeling.  This industry sucks.  If they can't there is onlyfans.

On 2/13/2025 at 4:35 AM, Cult Icon said:

 

It's a shame- due to market conditions- that modeling can only be a part-time job for the vast majority now, and even those with careers it is brief..

 

Besides Rachel Cook, there are other established and once successful models (that I won't name here) that have turned to OF and become sex workers/strippers like her in order to make a living.  I doubt any of them would do that if it didn't pay and certainly when they started modeling, in some cases as young as 15, they didn't envision that one day they have to become a sex worker.

 

So many models on BZ were simply born in the wrong era.  

Gosh, they'd have to build their own brands and do more than just look pretty. 

I know a LOT of models, modelled myself.  A LOT were sex workers and escorts anyway and a lot were just looking for a super rich husband. It's all been democratised now and isn't centralised, neither is porn. There's not a room of smoking Italians, greeks and americans deciding what is attractive and pretending the fashion industry was anything more than marketing girls to rich men and creating an industry that used the bodies carrying the clothes as much as garments as the actual clothes themselves. 

We're now in a situation where girls can get to that top tier wealth without having to "jump through hoops on their knees" 

What I like about Rachel, she's not out there pretending to be someone she's not. She's doing her own thing, making bags, farming corn and not just using her body but running her life like a business. I don't know if she's smart or not, but she's doing well. And she doesn't seem to have to kiss the ass of creepy dudes or do yacht parties to make it. 

 

I think that's a healthier "modelling" industry than the "dinner with the sheik" BS from the past. People know what it is now when they see the potty's on instagram and it's not hidden behind the BS veneer of a shoot nobody will see put on so that the local model house can please a bunch of rich a-holes and rich bachelors with no personality.  

^

Yeah, how many young girls can build a brand?

 

I think what you describe is characteristic of the few, not the majority of models... the way your posts read as if models = whore/gold-digger.

 

The model I am talking about's husband works a lower income job.

 

That being said calling OF 'healthy' is strange as it is turning so many women from many walks of life into sex workers.

3 hours ago, Cult Icon said:

^

Yeah, how many young girls can build a brand?

 

I think what you describe is characteristic of the few, not the majority of models... the way your posts read as if models = whore/gold-digger.

 

The model I am talking about's husband works a lower income job.

 

That being said calling OF 'healthy' is strange as it is turning so many women from many walks of life into sex workers.

 

And you may not think girls can do it but I think they can. I work in marketing and I see it every week. The ones that make it, like in every industry, are the ones that stick to it and adapt to what works and manage their brand. There's literally 1000's of examples of it, maybe 10'000's - not all are millionaires, but many can make a living without relying on creepy agents. 

Which leads me on to what I was speaking about in the old model industry, that still exists but isn't the draw it once was: I'm describing what I saw and know to exist from the middle to upper tier models. Lower tier local models will get catalogue work and some other things, but what I am speaking is known as "fact". Seen with my own eyes and well publicised. 

Model houses where agencies and models live , move, network throughout the year and they're paid and encouraged to date wealthy men connected to agencies. In some cases it's more straight forward. Some models are in it to get into those upper, upper tier social circles for life, knowing they'll be set. Just because you're oblivious to it doesn't mean it's not fact, there's a ton of instances in public view where what I am talking about is in public view. The fact that a rich man can point at a girl on the cover of a magazine or her instagram and often get a date with that girl now and 20 years ago - facts. Famous models ot lower end girls too, all depends on them , their agency, etc. 

And yeah, you seem to be projecting all onlyfans girls are sex workers - look at the stats, they don't all do sex work and even professional athletes have onlyfans to raise funds - if you knew more about the world you'd know that's ACTUALLY what the platform was intended for. 

So...you're projecting. Get offended. I am speaking facts, look it up. The platform has more non-porn profiles than porn profiles. YOU may be following only porn, but many are following SFW content on there too. Before you get enraged, I said "many", not "most" - porn is likely the most popular and makes the most money, but that doesn't mean that onlyfans creators doing non-porn work is non-existent 

That said: Rachel cook is not a sex worker. She's a model/nude model. MANY OF girls use her model and , like models in the past, they run their accounts like a business but they avoid a middle man. She has a setup where her or a team she employs via her generated revenue make very consistent and varying content and she clearly has tested and changed to what works and what she's willing to do. She's never even kissed another person on camera, so calling it sex work it like calling someone driving for door dash a professional race car driver. 

You clearly don't know about the back of house for the real modelling industry and porn industry, I'll tell you now - it's WAY better that these girls get to make their own choices rather than getting sucked into seedy spaces where they can be led astray and more. They get to focus on their look, promotion and working with who they want and they manage their own audience and engagement how they want - or at least they have the option to do that now . 10 years ago you didn't have that. 

They also get more of the money for the work and don't have to make money where they don't see the revenues and sign a contract based on what a monopoly offered them. So, yea, I say good for them. They're not being bullied by shadowy figures into doing things the way a small , powerful minority wants them to do and I think that's a good thing. IF they're cover models or pornstars who take 100 dicks in a day - they girls have more power now and get more of the money. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.