Nine Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 I'm never too quick to defend anyone, but the definition of pedofilia is being horribly misused here.Pedophilia is psychosexual disorder in which there is a preference for sexual activity with prepubertal children. And there is nothing prepubescent about Daniel Radcliffe atm. The proper name calling would be wannabe statutory rapist. Not sure if that's BETTER, but its certainly more accurate, if the person stating such desire is over the age of I think 20 and the person lusted after is under 16. Or 18 in some places.But, in the defense of these girls and those men who look at, say, his Hermione counterpart, it is in human nature to look at other people who are attractive. You are only dirty if you fit the definition above. And if you do, seek help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel717 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 honestly, i dont think Daniel Ids Hot, im a fan of HP but he's just still to boyish...nice body though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest inah Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 honestly, i dont think Daniel Ids Hot, im a fan of HP but he's just still to boyish...nice body though i agree, he doesnt appeal to me so much, but he's really cute, not sexy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel717 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 true, its kinda obvious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Compassionate_Conservative Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 I love Daniel! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keshuvaL Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keshuvaL Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mem0rial_FoX Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 I very like those 3 pics : He is a man now... 18 years old in July (23th I think) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velvetduster Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 Details mag i have a copy... since july 20th!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥AlbaForEver♥ Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 sexy thanx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mylovelyangel Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 Expecto Patronummmmm! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunning Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 i love dan q magazine 2oo7. http://radlifemedia.net/thumbnails.php?album=201' rel="external nofollow"> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedcrazyness Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 thanks for all of the pictures!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedcrazyness Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Good News Everyone!Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will be made in two films, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" , and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II"The L.A Times is reporting an exclusive today: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will be made in two films, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" , and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II. Furthermore, the paper cites producer David Heyman confirming the return of David Yates as director for both films, with Steven Kloves to finish out his duties as screenwriter for both Harry Potter movies as well. The movies are to be filmed at the same time, and will be released several months apart, with Part One due November 2010, and Part Two, May 2011.The article has additional information now, with quotes from producer David Heyman on his conversation with Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling on splitting the book into two films. "Heyman said he approached Rowling with some trepidation about the strategy but found that she signed off on its logic rather quickly. "I went to Jo and she was cool with it," Heyman said, "and that was quite a relief."The newspaper continues saying "Producer David Heyman said the decision was made with some anxiety and only after considerable deliberations. The producer joked that "while my wife and Warner Brothers were pleased" to hear that the Potter movie magic will continue into the next decade, he himself fretted that the cynical observers would see the decision as a purely mercenary move."I swear to you it was born out of purely creative reasons," Heyman said during an interview in a converted airplane factory outside London that has been home base to all of the "Potter" productions. "Unlike every other book, you cannot remove elements of this book. You can remove scenes of Ron playing quidditch from the fifth book, and you can remove Hermione and S.P.E.W. [society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare] and those subplots . . . but with the seventh, that can't be done."Actor Dan Radcliffe who portrays Harry Potter in the film is quoted as saying "I think it's the only way you can do it without cutting out a huge portion of the book," Radcliffe said recently during a break on the set of "Half-Blood Prince," the sixth "Potter" film, which is due in theaters on Nov. 21. "There have been compartmentalized subplots in the other books that have made them easier to cut - although those cuts were still to the horror of some fans- but the seventh book doesn't really have any subplots. It's one driving, pounding story from the word go."Of interest to many fans is the spot in the book where the films will break, and producer David Heyman addresses this as he notes: "The question will be, where do you break it? And how do you make them one but two separate and distinct stories? Do you break it with a moment of suspense or one of resolution? These are the interesting challenges. But each book has presented its challenges." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarMELita Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Well. Good news is it's going to be a long movie, but the second part is scheduled for may 2011! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.