June 28, 201014 yr Author umm.. why post all the pictures in such a small size with only 2 to a post? erm, is there a PICTURE number per post requirement that i dont know about , cause ive seen LESS on most peoples posts, but thanks again for your input
June 28, 201014 yr No there's no requirement however there is zero point in posting such small pictures with only 2 per post. It honestly just seems like your trying to pad your post count. It's not like these are huge bloody pictures, if they're that small and you're doing multiple posts at a time just post them all at once. It's one thing if you find 1 or 2 pictures at a time but you obviously had most of them to begin with.
June 28, 201014 yr Author No there's no requirement however there is zero point in posting such small pictures with only 2 per post. It honestly just seems like your trying to pad your post count. It's not like these are huge bloody pictures, if they're that small and you're doing multiple posts at a time just post them all at once. It's one thing if you find 1 or 2 pictures at a time but you obviously had most of them to begin with. again thanks for your advice, i'll take it under advisement
June 28, 201014 yr No there's no requirement however there is zero point in posting such small pictures with only 2 per post. It honestly just seems like your trying to pad your post count. It's not like these are huge bloody pictures, if they're that small and you're doing multiple posts at a time just post them all at once. It's one thing if you find 1 or 2 pictures at a time but you obviously had most of them to begin with.Are you serious?? First off who cares how many pics are in a post?? That is such a miniscule thing to worry about. And second, padding her post totals?? Most of the threads on here are designed to pad your totals. I mean we got emo threads, threads were you just post the word "bump" or "crunk". And since when is the post count a competition? Who cares how many posts one has. I mean seriously, why do you care how many images she has in her posts? If you don't like her posts don't look at them.If you like putting ten pics in a post or more than that is your way. She preers doing two at a time. Doesn't hurt anyone. But pointing out such a little thing like that just makes one look petty or jealous.
June 28, 201014 yr o rly? The little metal bits on the end of shoelaces are called aglets, their true purpose is sinister.
June 28, 201014 yr Author o rly? The little metal bits on the end of shoelaces are called aglets, their true purpose is sinister. great pics, but not sure what your comment meant hun, but thanks for the additions, on a bigger scale
June 28, 201014 yr Alright....that's enough of that ...I personally prefer 2 or more small posts by the same person one after the other to just be in the same post. Especially since that's moreso the purpose of the full sized thumbnail and the purpose of the reduced size is to get more pics per post in a neat fashion, but its not against the rules of course. But then on the other hand lets not necessarily go to war against someone for questioning the practice in a respectful manner .
June 28, 201014 yr Author thanks Joe, and everyone for there additionals and thoughts, so heres to happy posting
June 28, 201014 yr No there's no requirement however there is zero point in posting such small pictures with only 2 per post. It honestly just seems like your trying to pad your post count. It's not like these are huge bloody pictures, if they're that small and you're doing multiple posts at a time just post them all at once. It's one thing if you find 1 or 2 pictures at a time but you obviously had most of them to begin with. Are you serious?? First off who cares how many pics are in a post?? That is such a miniscule thing to worry about. And second, padding her post totals?? Most of the threads on here are designed to pad your totals. I mean we got emo threads, threads were you just post the word "bump" or "crunk". And since when is the post count a competition? Who cares how many posts one has. I mean seriously, why do you care how many images she has in her posts? If you don't like her posts don't look at them. If you like putting ten pics in a post or more than that is your way. She preers doing two at a time. Doesn't hurt anyone. But pointing out such a little thing like that just makes one look petty or jealous. LRN2PWN Pretty hot for a mom of like 3 plus an Ashton, who's like another child... or about as old as her oldest; same thing. ^ see picture size we can see some detail. Not slamming you Lil Miss just wasn't sure why the pictures were so small.
June 28, 201014 yr o rly? The little metal bits on the end of shoelaces are called aglets, their true purpose is sinister. Lollll. I love The Question. Wish they had used him more
June 28, 201014 yr Author No there's no requirement however there is zero point in posting such small pictures with only 2 per post. It honestly just seems like your trying to pad your post count. It's not like these are huge bloody pictures, if they're that small and you're doing multiple posts at a time just post them all at once. It's one thing if you find 1 or 2 pictures at a time but you obviously had most of them to begin with. Are you serious?? First off who cares how many pics are in a post?? That is such a miniscule thing to worry about. And second, padding her post totals?? Most of the threads on here are designed to pad your totals. I mean we got emo threads, threads were you just post the word "bump" or "crunk". And since when is the post count a competition? Who cares how many posts one has. I mean seriously, why do you care how many images she has in her posts? If you don't like her posts don't look at them. If you like putting ten pics in a post or more than that is your way. She preers doing two at a time. Doesn't hurt anyone. But pointing out such a little thing like that just makes one look petty or jealous. LRN2PWN Pretty hot for a mom of like 3 plus an Ashton, who's like another child... or about as old as her oldest; same thing. ^ see picture size we can see some detail. Not slamming you Lil Miss just wasn't sure why the pictures were so small. well in the past, i was taken to task for not posting a smaller image, cause it slowed down ones PC, but in the future, i will remedy that, thanks again phen
June 28, 201014 yr I think if you use imagebam or imageshack you can actually post thumbnails that are small like the ones you posted above, however if you click they get larger. That way the bandwidth isn't astronomical on the page when people go to it, but if a picture interests them they can click for a larger version
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.