steve with an s

with Kate Moss and Chrystele backstage at Todd Oldham 1994 http://books.google.com/books?id=UuMCAAAAM...r6Ng&w=1025

with Patricia Velasquez and Kate Moss backstage at Todd Oldham 1994 http://books.google.com/books?id=UuMCAAAAM...r6Ng&w=1025

Nice article about Christy by Michael Gross, with some great early pics. New York Magazine Mar 9 1992 p 38 http://books.google.com/books?id=SOQCAAAAM...ad=0_0#PPA38,M1

I believe this is from that campaign: There is a nice article about Rosemary's ad campaigns (and career) with Donna Karan here. Feb 17 1992 NYM p 16 http://books.google.com/books?id=eeMCAAAAM...ad=0_0#PPA16,M1

Sorry, that was a confusing post on my part. The post also isn't helped by the disappearing/re-appearing thumbnail (Imageshack) I tried to post. The first one is indeed one you posted on the first page of the thread. This is the one I tried to post, and ask about, which I think is Patricia (but not sure): And this is also the one that is the January 6 1992 back cover. Sorry for the confusion! (There is one more CHANEL ad with Patricia in the Model ID Help request I posted last week. In the second link in my signature.)

small only, from New York Magazine Cover for the November/December 1994 The Learning Annex course syllabus: http://books.google.com/books?id=M-QCAAAAM...tXaA&w=1025 * Miss! I just loved that 1984 pic! What a motley collection of faces that was!

1992 CHANEL ad, from the January 6 New York Magazine back cover. I think this is also Patricia?

I have never seen this. I am (very slowly) reading the older issues of New York Magazine. GUESS ads (Carre, and Shana, and Claudia) are quite common in the issues. I'll keep my eye out for that ad (and the other two you asked about).

New to me. I really like her. Thanks!

Thank you both! I knew one of those pictures, but never knew who the model was. Dayrell, that Chatelaine cover is gorgeous!

Thank you.

That's great! Thank you all.

Those are awesome, Kiki!

Many thanks in advance. All ads from 1991 New York Magazine. Issues/pages in filenames.

Figured that was likely. I'm using an old, tired LCD (with a little bleed at the corner), and it tends to crush fine shadow detail. Do appreciate your going to that extra trouble and checking, though. Thanks for that.

Welcome Viiiii! Glad you joined and posted! And you picked a great thread to make your first post in! :dance:

Agree! Thank you both!

Favorite. Top ten. Seriously. Top ten. Phil is it my old and tired LCD screen, or did you push blacks in that? I'm looking at the version I had seen before, which I think is Zothike's. But I can see gathering in the fabric around her hip in that previous one. Is it just my old (weak) LCD or did you push blacks? (that's NOT a complaint, of course! I have the same problem when I try to order photo prints online -- contrast and black are WAYYY, WAYYYY off compared to best attempts with my screen. Wish for inexpensive color calibration.) Sorry to hear about the fires down your way.

You might have "0% professional experience", but you've got talent. Seriously. If either of those were a current cover, I'd definitely buy the magazine. Nice job on that.

Phil and moon_HU! Those are awesome! Thank you!

All new to me. Thank you all. !

Whatever works for you I think is best. I think 1900x1200 would be a relatively large size. I believe the Google images service/search would actually classify that dimension as "extra large". 900x1200 would be relatively typical, I would say (and I think classified as "large" by the Google images service).

And we love you just the way you are.

Thanks, PAL. Gorgeous.

Wow! Those are great videos, AirAngel! So glad you joined and posted!