Joe > Average

I can't say much yet because I'm not an authority yet, but I will say some . How would I compare? Well, the guys in the NFL are crazy . But the guys in rugby are crazy . What I like most about Rugby so far is it gives me a middle ground between the NFL and socceer. Soccer with "attitude" if you will . I can't give a full comparisson yet because I'm still learning the rules . But it is becoming one of my favorite sports now along with of course NFL, basketball, golf, wrestling...and of course table tennis . I think the NFL has probably more contrast between the different positions than other sports (lineman are the biggest and strongest whereas defensive backs, receivers and punt returners are the fastest) and everyone else is in between (quarterbacks, running backs, linebackers, full backs, tight ends) are anywhere in between. Whereas rugby seems to blend the different tasks for its structure. NFL, you need the best (with the skill and knowledge to play of course) at each individual attribute (throwing, kicking, running, manuevering, catching, covering, tackling, blocking...) to specialize at their position. Whereas in Rugby you need the best (with the knowledge and skill toplay of course) at combining the different areas (running, throwing, kicking, tackling, blocking) opposed to being the best at each quality individually. Both systems work for their respective purpose and are very entertaining . Since there are so many players it makes the strategy interresting as well and also because they are contact sports, pressuring offenses is important and seeing how those on the offensive deal with that pressure always builds suspense and excitement. For both, I don't have to have a high score to be entertained. Since scores in both sports don't happen as often as say, basketball, the scores are appreciated in a different way once they do happen. I find low scoring games entertaining as well, because I am entertained by the defense as well and the battle in the trenches, but scoring is always appreciated, of course . I can just sit back, enjoy, grab some nachos and a juice box with the guys and have a good time .

No, of course not . sorry . HOOCH !!!

Claire Durkin ? Or someone else ? Real hips ? And who is this ?

Thanks .

Candice Sweetpool vs. Kitty Katja . Undecided for now .

Woa ... never heard of her .

Oh, no ! What do do ?

VOTING CLOSED WINNER Edita Edita 59 points Maryna 34 points RULES 3 Points overall 1 point for natural (how little they need makeup to look their best and complection) 2 points to who you think is more beautiful Distribute how you will within that format Candice Swanepoel (Pictures by TheBarronofFratton) Katja Schemininja (NOMINATED by sarnic, pictures by AnnaBeatrizBarrosFan)

Dang it, I can't resist the eyes . But it looks like one of the mods deleted your thread overninght . *goes to your profile page* Six Nations 2008 Rugby Highlights

I love her work ! Thanks !

HOOCK !!!

I don't want to get in trouble for being off topic, so I guess I'll say it on your thread .

Someone wants her id'ed but I forgot who !

Does anyone have the one with little red riding hood going through the gold building ? And there's the wolf at the end . It may be Chanel .

I think the girls left are all model potential. Modeling has many avenues and veins. Theres much more than high fashion and VS. But they all have stregnths that can suit one or more of the many areas if they apply themselves .

Woa ... :shock: ...

10 wow :shock: . Kristen .

RULES WINNER Rosie Rosie 43 (56% of the points) Catherine 33 :pinch: 3 Points overall 1 point for natural (how little they need makeup to look their best and complection) 2 points to who you think is more beautiful Distribute how you will within that format Round 1, Group 3: Pair 1 Edita Vilkeviciute(Pictures by lisa-1) Maryna Linchuk (pictures by Lisa-1)