Joe > Average

I didn't know they still said "coloured" in England , thanks she's cute .

Even if she were attractive, Miss America is so lame it would nullify it .

Lips: 6 Smile: 9 Hair: 6 Eyes: 5 Nose: 5 Abs: 10 Cleavage: 10 Butt: 6 Legs: 9

1.5

Not knocking you as a person but...Why do you torment me ?!

I guess the 15 manditory and 5 TV optional ?

First Name: Alexandra Last Name: D____? Agency: Next Models Company Figured I'd give her a thread in case she caught on though looks like another one in the model protection program .

Congratulations on a job well done sagi . And to add to the conversation, to me the natural pics of both are equally unflattering and thus cancel each other out .

Hmmm...Before you do, I might have to simplify it one more time or else there may not be a comp. I'll make one final reduction to 15 best actresses only (still with the performances in parenthesis). If it fails, it was worth it at least to know what would have happened, and no bumping please, if it dies, it dies with dignity .

I guess the second two will have to be optional, but for the manditory, list the 20 most talented actresses of film (major, made for tv, any language) of the last decade (2000-2010) with a performance in parenthesis as an example of said talent. 1. Jennka (The Little Slovak that Could) 2. Layla90 (Poland Opposites) 2. pink (PinkCouture and pink) 3. PinkCouture (PinkCouture and pink) 4. Squeege Beckenheim (Squeeze the Beckenheim) 5. Hime (Middle Eastern Promises) 6. Ophalia_Immortal (Mona's Labyrinth) 7. Chocolate (Box of Chocolates) 8. vanessaaa (V for vanessaaa) ect.

I'm going to say this again, to all you people hatin' on various actresses saying they have no talent, if you don't vote in this comp and stand up for the people you think do, ain't tryin' to hear it .

No, but I understand because I suddenly realize that two of my favorites (Angela Basset and Kathy Bates) haven't got much work in the last decade . Close and thanks for jumping out there . Though since the second list is best individual performance (for example someone who only got to star in one movie and it was an amazing performance), so you have to say the name of the movie. You're probably not alone . How about this, first list is manditory and second two lists are optional...and I'll pm people from the actress forum to make up the difference...

How To Vote 1. List your top 20 actresses based on talent with their best performance of the last decade (2000-2010) in parenthesis next to their name. They will not be countred without that performance in parenthesis . Yes there's a separate list for performances, but since I can't make anyone focus on talent rather than looks, I figure somoene randomly putting Carmen Electra is one thing, but having to put "Scary Movie 6" next to her name should at least make them think twice maybe . 2. Top 10 best individual performances. 3. Top 10 best TV actresses You may begin .

Thanks phenie and thanks Theron, I was going to post that, do you have the nominees too ? How do you think I should do the points ? I would not let her be in the contest... She's only been mentioned once, so she's probably not as popular as you think . Though now its difficult for actresses over 50 to get regular work a lot of times and most of it goes to her .

I'm guessing you're a fan :morning: . Nice pic . This is not without makeup . Not that many leave home without it of course...

Fair enough . Yeah, I had decided against head to head since I remember in "Everything About Her" in the talent portions people were like "a clip isn't enough to judge" "I haven't see any of her movies" "its in french" ect. so instead of people just defaulting to the person they know (or unrealistically expecting someone to rent a movie for a round that may only last a day) I figured it would be better for people to just make their own lists like Bellazon's hottest comp. And the only thing I'm waiting on is some input as to what number for the lists would be the most practical .

(much funnier with the ninjas ) Mila Kunis x3

Unfair, some of the best acting ever done was in 1999! I vote that we include 1999 too! There were some good acting animals in 2000 that probably won't get a shot, life's just not fair I guess .

I had wanted to do this a long time ago, but forgot about it and just thought of it again randomly and hadn't intended on going for it, but I guess I'm just impulsive . I'll just try it out, but if it falls on its face, it won't be the first time *deleted the threads to hide the evidence* . But long story short, I know its a fashion forum, so of course the best looking actresses are the most popular, but I've always wanted to do a talent based competition. Even if we don't all agree, that doesn't matter, as long as that is the shared intent, I wanted to give that a shot. Anyway, you never know until you try . Premise Top actresses by performance of the last decade. Partially because it doesn't have a catch name (like 90s or 80s ect.) its easy for some to forget it was a decade :| . Preemptive Q&A Why not all time? Lets just see how this works first. What is the time range? 2000-2010 Can it be from any country? Yes Can it be a made for TV or straight to video movie? If you feel she is as or more talented than the major film, by all means. What about 2011? 2000-2010 Does it have to be an oscar/golden globe ect. winner or nominee? Nope, its based on your opinion. Your opinion is as relevant as any for your vote. What's the minimum age? Erm...talent is talent I guess, lol? Do we factor in looks? Its probably inevitable to some degree on a fashion forum, but I'd rather not. What to do? 1. You will list the top actresses of the last decade in order of talent with what you consider to be their best performance in parenthesis. This is not to say ordering them by the individual performance, but so if you want to just randomly put someone's name, you at least have to put yourself out there with a performance . 2. Separate list of your top 5 best individual performances. 3. There will be two titles, one for Bellazon's best actress and another for best performance (probably a point for the performance being mentioned in the actress list and 2-3 points for being mentioned and rank in the performance list. 4. I was originally going to do nominations and person vs. person, but I remember there being a competiton that included talent and people saying they hadn't seen anything with the person in it ect. So since its a bit much to ask for a person to go out in their way and watch a whole movie just for a round that may be closed anyway by the time they even get the movie, I figured its better to do some version of the Bellazon's hottest format and have people make their own lists. Bugs to Work Out/Outside Input 1. How many for the lists? top 10 actresses? top 15 actresses? top 20 actresses? 2. And how many for the performance list? 5? 10? 15? 20? 3. Should there be a third list for TV series actress? I'll take input for about a day and just go for it after that . All in all, to all you hating on some chick saying, "she has no talent ect." here's your chance to speak up for talent .

Not overly attracted to her, but she has a funny personality and is a heck of a hf model . Lips: 5 Smile: 7 Hair: 6 Eyes: 7 Nose: 5 Abs: 10 Cleavage: 5 Butt: 5 Legs: 7

I think she may have done it like that to emphasize the number of nominators. Of course. Well, yeah, that's why I didn't respond to it because it was censored . Okay, well, guess I interpreted that the opposite, so fair enough . And of course my issue wasn't liking the person as I take up for people I'm not attracted to at all (like Kate Moss and Natasha Poly). Well yes, that is an issue, though pictures could be deceptive in the other system too, only it was neutralized by us knowing who they were. Of course, with this system there is 5 pics (half of last time). But last time I think people rated mostly the name rather than the pics (and of course people still do that with those they know, though not as many recognize). And of course, in some cases, having 5 more pics may make a person just as likely to do worse as better as just like you could see something that makes one feature look more pleasing, you could see something that makes you like it less. Like the woman above, for me has no booty or hips, but then with the two boob shots, they appear to me to be rock hard in the yellow bikini pic, whereas I'd probably have liked it more with just the red, so I would have scored higher with 4 pics in that case. But I can see what you mean that with more pics you can have a better evaluation, but part of the reason we came to the agreement of 5 was to increase nominations I think, so its ironic that there were the least nominations ever . Actually, the biggest deception to me was that I didn't recognize Petra Cubonova because in the commercials I've seen her in her booty is flat as can be and was medium sized and round in her pics. She would have still done well and that's more about photoshop than pic selection and that would have been the same even if I saw her face and didn't know her, but again that goes to not seeing the face rather than the pics. But overall, they both have their flaws, but I think it was worth it to at least see what happened .

Congrats Matt ! Its kindof funny that I thought it was "Matt LOVES Models" like a general statement when its "Matt LOVE Models" kindof like a caveman moreso, like "Matt love food" .

She (in this) is by far my favorite in the top 10, but regardless of who on the list was on top or if its someone I don't like at all, I still wouldn't call it or people's opinions a "joke" . Just like the things you like that I don't understand and bodies you like that have no appeal for me, diversity makes the world more interresting. One person's as justified in liking what they like as another, no matter how different they may be . One of my own brothers prefers muscular women. That's not my preference, but my taste is no more valid than his.

2.6