Joe > Average

Oh, sorry phenie and sagi. As to the nomination thing, I'm sure the not having a public list complicated the process for most, as the list of names would have been clues, but at the end of the day, we've had the votes and we've made it this far, so its all good . 2.5 - the genetic potential is there, just needs to be maximized.

You nominated someone (whose name I won't say since she hasn't been) and I did tell you she was nominated .

One seems to me like Amy Windhouse standing around and the other is incredibly boring . 1.5 Each *edit* Okay, it is supposed to be Amy Windhouse, okay, hehehe .

Happy Australia Day, donbot !

Lips: 7 Smile: 6 Hair: 6 Eyes: 6 Nose: 7 Abs: 10 Cleavage: 9 Butt: 5 Legs: 6

Totals from the lists. I wanted to do one on one, but I remember in the "Everything About Her" comp people were like, "I haven't seen any of her movies, a clip isn't enough" "its in Spanish" ect. But anyway, I was wondering if this would be easier as... A) A poll with 20-30 respected actresses from the decade (2000-2010) B) An all-time list C) 90s-present list (in contrast to all time as that's the most common range of awareness of this sites demographic) D) other, speak up if so Speak now or forever hold your peace .

Wow, Lima, I never would have guessed . Never seen her legs or abs look like that, I'm not going to say what that ab shot reminds me of because I'll get in trouble I guess .

I know it isn't easy, but thanks guys for going for it . I just want to make a few things as clear as I can since there have been many revisions. 1. The performance list was taken out to make things more simple (as the two were getting confused). 2. So the film actress list (top 15) is a list of best (or most talented) actresses. The performance in parenthesis are ONLY for insurrance that the voter at least thinks for a second before putting the name. I repeat, the order is by actress talent, not best individual performance and the performance is only insurrance that the voter took at least a second to think.

1.5 - I don't think its 'bad' I just don't particularly like anything about it . Ok then.

A fe nice editorials so far .

I didn't know they still said "coloured" in England , thanks she's cute .

Even if she were attractive, Miss America is so lame it would nullify it .

Lips: 6 Smile: 9 Hair: 6 Eyes: 5 Nose: 5 Abs: 10 Cleavage: 10 Butt: 6 Legs: 9

1.5

Not knocking you as a person but...Why do you torment me ?!

I guess the 15 manditory and 5 TV optional ?

First Name: Alexandra Last Name: D____? Agency: Next Models Company Figured I'd give her a thread in case she caught on though looks like another one in the model protection program .

Congratulations on a job well done sagi . And to add to the conversation, to me the natural pics of both are equally unflattering and thus cancel each other out .

Hmmm...Before you do, I might have to simplify it one more time or else there may not be a comp. I'll make one final reduction to 15 best actresses only (still with the performances in parenthesis). If it fails, it was worth it at least to know what would have happened, and no bumping please, if it dies, it dies with dignity .

I guess the second two will have to be optional, but for the manditory, list the 20 most talented actresses of film (major, made for tv, any language) of the last decade (2000-2010) with a performance in parenthesis as an example of said talent. 1. Jennka (The Little Slovak that Could) 2. Layla90 (Poland Opposites) 2. pink (PinkCouture and pink) 3. PinkCouture (PinkCouture and pink) 4. Squeege Beckenheim (Squeeze the Beckenheim) 5. Hime (Middle Eastern Promises) 6. Ophalia_Immortal (Mona's Labyrinth) 7. Chocolate (Box of Chocolates) 8. vanessaaa (V for vanessaaa) ect.

I'm going to say this again, to all you people hatin' on various actresses saying they have no talent, if you don't vote in this comp and stand up for the people you think do, ain't tryin' to hear it .

No, but I understand because I suddenly realize that two of my favorites (Angela Basset and Kathy Bates) haven't got much work in the last decade . Close and thanks for jumping out there . Though since the second list is best individual performance (for example someone who only got to star in one movie and it was an amazing performance), so you have to say the name of the movie. You're probably not alone . How about this, first list is manditory and second two lists are optional...and I'll pm people from the actress forum to make up the difference...

How To Vote 1. List your top 20 actresses based on talent with their best performance of the last decade (2000-2010) in parenthesis next to their name. They will not be countred without that performance in parenthesis . Yes there's a separate list for performances, but since I can't make anyone focus on talent rather than looks, I figure somoene randomly putting Carmen Electra is one thing, but having to put "Scary Movie 6" next to her name should at least make them think twice maybe . 2. Top 10 best individual performances. 3. Top 10 best TV actresses You may begin .

Thanks phenie and thanks Theron, I was going to post that, do you have the nominees too ? How do you think I should do the points ? I would not let her be in the contest... She's only been mentioned once, so she's probably not as popular as you think . Though now its difficult for actresses over 50 to get regular work a lot of times and most of it goes to her .