Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

OriginalSin

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OriginalSin

  1. OriginalSin replied to funnyfan's post in a topic in Female Fashion Models
    Velvet April 2007 "Oggi Sensualita" ph. John Akehurst source: scanned by me
  2. OriginalSin replied to azkid's post in a topic in Female Fashion Models
    Back on topic please
  3. The rule is that you have to wait at least 3 months from your join date. So come back to me in a few weeks (no earlier than July 12th), and I'll change it then if you still want it to be changed
  4. source: http://donne.alice.it/gallery/rockn_rose.html
  5. woooo haha Thanks! It was my intention for my 20,000th post to be dedicated to someone on BZ but oh well Talking about Mona is good enough I suppose Yes it is! Changed Thanks
  6. A wise decision to post in here my friend...a wise decision ETA: and I just realized this is my 20,000th post *tear* It's official. I AM a loser!
  7. ^Scratch that. We have a slight problem. The name Gabriela is already taken. Would you like something else instead?
  8. haha wow, you guys are really taking this three month rule literally Sure, I'll go change it right now
  9. yes, what do you want it changed to?
  10. raises hand and I wanna know how you stole it from the website haha well I don't know how Pink did it but I snatched them out of my Temporary Internet Files folder like you taught me
  11. just came back to change those 2 names! *rushes back into hiatus*
  12. ^ I agree for the most part. I think it would be good to get a model on the cover a few times a year, but they don't sell as well. Those interested in fashion are more likely to overlook the fact that a celeb they don't like is on the cover b/c most of the issue is fashion-related anyway and that's what they want. But a celeb on the cover reaches out to those people who aren't all that interested in fashion but who are willing to buy a mag with their favorite celeb on the cover. So I think US Vogue thinks it's reaching a bigger audience when they do this. And the results seem to back that up b/c Liya Kebede's cover in 2005 was one of the worst selling issues in recent years. The Sept 2004 Vogue cover with all the models, however, DID sell extremely well, but I think it's harder to tell if that's b/c of the models or b/c it was a Sept issue and those tend to sell better in general. I guess we'll know after this May cover. Hopefully if this sells very well, Anna Wintour will consider making a habit of putting models on the cover at least a few times a year. Like you, I wish Vogue would be more willing to take risks, but this is a business too I suppose and we have to think of it like that Oh and I just noticed your other post. No worries about the year, we all make goofs
  13. OriginalSin replied to azkid's post in a topic in Female Fashion Models
    In a couple of weeks probably
  14. I respectfully disagree about the terms being interchangeable, but I do agree that bona fide supermodels are long gone. I just feel that the term barely has a place in today's modeling world, which is why I wouldn't use them interchangeably. To me a supermodel has to gain appeal and exposure outside of the industry whereas a top model only has to be successful within the industry. But that is me, and I understand that you have a different opinion on that. But actually, no it's not ridiculous "no matter how I slice it." In fact, if I use what you said: "whichever girls nab the top runway shows, ad campaigns, and editorials are really the next best thing" then people like Coco Rocha HAVE to be on the cover. First Coco: for FW07 she did almost 70 shows, she's been in so many editorials lately I've actually lost count, she was on Feb's cover of Vogue Italia with Hilary. She was on another Vogue Italia cover in 2006. She's recenly been on the covers of other magazines such as Vogue Nippon, Numero, i-D, and Time Style & Design (which admittedly isn't an important fashion mag BUT the types of girls who usually get their covers are the popular/top ones - Daria, Gemma, Liya, Isabeli, Doutzen, Du Juan) She's doing Balenciaga, Lanvin, and Christian Lacroix for Spring 2007. She's already got the Dolce & Gabbana campaign lined up for Fall 2007. Her level of attractiveness is a matter of opinion. So is whether or not she's a good model, but obviously the people casting her think has something to offer because she wouldn't be getting so much work otherwise. I don't think there's any question that given all this she currently doing very well and would be considered a top model. Now Lily: for FW07 she did about 50 shows (incl all the major ones), she was recently on the cover of i-D mag and was featured in three editorials in that one magazine, Miss Dior Cherie (this is a fragrance campaign which is huge), Dior Cruise, Burberry SS07, recent editorials in Harper's Bazaar, Vogue, Numero, etc. And since you mention Hilary, here's what her recent work has looked like: recent Vogue Italia cover, 3 recent US Vogue editorials, editorials in other major mags, Donna Karan SS07, Dolce & Gabbana Cruise, Givenchy SS07, Gucci Cruise, and recently landed an Estee Lauder contract. She was lacking in FW07 shows this season (less than 20) but then again so was Doutzen (not saying Doutzen doesn't deserve to be on this cover, just pointing out that other things, such as long-term cosmetics contracts can balance things out) I am not here to debate WHY any of the 10 (or imo 9) girls are successful (because that varies - from actual ability to a photographer's fascination with her to a certain editor-in-chief loving her to a wonderful personality to a designer considering her his muse). I have no desire to change your personal opinions on the any of girls, but given the point that you made, these girls should be on the cover because they have been successful in terms of editorials, campaigns, covers, and runway shows.
  15. I completely agree with this. US Vogue is boring. Really boring. :| This cover isn't great in terms of artistry or creativity. So far I only like it marginally better than the 2004 cover and that's mostly because all the girls aren't standing in a straight line :| Unfortunately, and I reluctantly say this in US Vogue's defense, it is catering to a certain market and everything the magazine seems to stand for reflects that. If America were less celeb-obsessed they would probably feature more models cause those mags would sell better than they do now. Also if America were less conservative (compared with the rest of the West I mean), there would probably be edgier editorials, covers, articles, etc. *sigh*
  16. bow down to me bitch *cracks whip*
  17. err, well while I do agree that Doutzen has the most supermodel appeal, I feel that I should point out, again, that the cover says absolutely nothing about any of these girls being supermodels, so they don't have to feature models who have any supermodel appeal if they don't want to. As such, the inclusion of people like Coco and Lily is not outrageous at all, even if they're unappealing commercially, because they are in fact doing extremely well in the fashion industry, and that is what a "Top Model" does. The only one who stands out as not being successful (yet) is Chanel. Even Agyness, though perhaps a flash in the pan as you suggest, is doing much better than Chanel (she's been in three of the major Vogues, landed a Vogue Italia cover last year, has 6 campaigns this season, did 30+ shows FW07, etc), and therefore has potential to continue being successful. Freja is [most likely] not on the cover b/c there are rumors that photographer Steven Meisel and she do not get along. I'd just like to add that Doutzen is the only girl on this cover who's on my top 10, and even she irks me at times. I don't like Coco. Agyness is meh to me. I'm on the fence with Sasha. I don't really notice Lily or Raquel. Stam is hit or miss for me. Hilary is growing on me but she's definitely not a fave. Caroline is overused in US Vogue and so whatever appeal she used to have to me has died. And I didn't even know of Chanel's existence until recently. So basically what I'm saying is that none of what I've said here has anything to do with my own personal preferences. ETA: I do agree that if they included Chanel for racial diversity, Du Juan should've been chosen instead. Despite the fact that Du Juan has slowed down considerably since last season, she is still a better and more deserving choice than Chanel.
  18. so easy to get carried away
  19. Diet Pepsi.
  20. Sort of a minor point, but the cover doesn't say next SUPERmodels. It says next top models, a category Sasha definitely fits into. She may look like a scary version of Gemma Ward but she's actually a GOOD model in terms of posing and expression, she's Prada exclusive and has been for a while, she's been on 2 Vogue Italia covers in just the last four months (not to mention any of her other covers in the past few seasons), she's been in plenty of editorials, she's got a cosmetics contract with Giorgio Armani, she did 60 shows in the FW07 season, and plenty of shows in previous seasons. There's absolutely no question that she deserves that cover. In the fashion industry, she is definitely one of the tops. Whether or not she has commercial appeal is a different story, but I'm fairly certain that's not what determined most of these girls making the cover.
  21. You should probably post a picture so people know what you're talking about Secondly, you have the year wrong, but I'll fix that As for the cover itself, all the choices make sense except Chanel. Freja is missing - it's so glaringly obvious it's painful. I can't stand the girl but she deserves to be on the cover. If you look at it from the perspective of those who have had the most editorials, covers, ad campaigns, runway shows in recent seasons and look at the caliber of those edits, ads, shows, etc. all those girls deserve to be there except Chanel. Eugenia had her shot in 2004. She should've been there but was pulled for whatever reason. I don't think she deserves to be there now though it would've been nice I suppose. Oh and if they were going for racial diversity, but someone who actually deserves it as well, I don't think Pei Bei would have been a good choice...at all, definitely not any better than Chanel Iman :|