Cain

Great adds, @elfstone ... I can't be the only one to think these are huge step up in quality over Runway Goddess.

Phenominal adds. Those aren't just massive photo's, they're exceptionally high quality in every department. Hair, make-up, outfit, editing ... Renée looks amazing. Instant wallpaper material.

It's a photo of Emily that's of HQ we haven't seen on this board, posted without context or caption. There's plenty of them like it that would be welcome on this thread that you can find on Emily's school's official Facebook page. Like this one: https://www.facebook.com/StMichaelsCollegeMerrimac/photos/a.151333435046654/1702654836581165/?type=3 Setting aside your bizarre conspiracy theory that Emily's school would post a doctored photo as part of conspiracy theory to make Emily seem younger than she actually is... please, we've been warned to refrain from back and forth and hijacking the thread.

🤣 What even is this conversation?

Literally burning things up! 😅 Boy am I glad I followed this thread way back when ... Renée has really been on fire lately. Her and Frida Aasen. Definitely my two favorites right now.

I'm starting to think we need a clean-up in aisle 16, @Clauds

https://www.instagram.com/p/CF4gp0chefq/

We are *one* page, ONE, removed from me establishing why Google search cannot be used to establish an age without verification. Google Ava Bizjak age. Then tell me what you see on her Instagram. "They", the fan and toxic paparazzi style websites that you seem to be referencing, are not valid or appropriate sources of information. They do not reference where they get their information because they can't. They do the same thing you are, "google it", and pick the first thing they find and copy and paste. Without any kind of confirmation from anybody a single mistake made by a page like FamousBirthdays or the like leads to everybody else after that mistake using the same birthday because it's the latest result. The model, her agency, and official companies like the agencies and artists she works for, are the only acceptable sources of age. Not a algorithm driven search engine that cares less for authenticity and verification.

whoa, blast from the past. Interesting timing as I'm trying to get back into cycling. Got one of those Marcy Ryders to put these legs and body through the paces and back into shape without embarrassing myself, and I've been eyeballing some bikes. Suggestions? I got a pretty wide variety of places to bike around where I live now.

You made an entire Bellazon account to ask this?

I'm with others in saying the shoot itself got a few things wrong like her makeup and the lighting, but gawd damn if this wasn't another reminder that Kelly has some of the best breasts in the business.

Oh I really like her modelling stuff! Her TikTok content was forgettable but she look greats in pro shoots.

I dunno why but I thought Kelly's shoots would get less and less sexy now that she's engaged ... but instead it seems like she's doing more? First the Intimates and now those amazing Ketella photos.

The two noted are Clint and Michael Murchie... I'm pretty sure there's a lot more but those are the two that have been previously been called out. Clint is pretty well know and has had previous complaints from models, but Murchie is an Australia specific photographer and works with both adults and kids like Emily and the Wollard sisters.

She's not represented by Que any more? I'm not sure what you're basing this on but her instagram and the website still has her listed... and I would be very surprised if Que didn't do their due diligence on Emily's age, if nothing else because it would probably be required for tax purposes.

I would expect a "Sweet 16" post more than I would a "finally legal" post on an account probably run by her parents. 😬

Some of those gooseberry intimates ... where ... where'd her boobs go?

I like her a lot! I can't find where she's from? The modeling agency suggests South Africa?

Google doesn't do the research, it quotes other pages ... the same pages that have been using the wrong Famous Birthday age for 2+ years now. Take for example 16 year old Ava Bizjak ... she's got one *really* wrong gossip page out there, and hilariously that's the page google sources it's data from. Whoever runs the show at listal has higher standards than these click bait gossip pages. While they're not exempt at getting things wrong from time to time, they've got both Emily and Ava right.

it feels weird diving into the personal life of an underage model like this, but it's also weird that said model and her handlers won't actually say if she's underage or not, so here we are. The award she's holding in said photo has a date, September 2020. A little digging puts that at the end of "term 3" of Year 10. The Brisbane Cathiloc Education System, which Emily's school is part of, has 4 terms that start in January and ends in December. Their "years" line up roughly to those in the US, but they group them differently. Year 10 is the final year of the "middle years" before becoming a Senior for years 11 & 12. The website lists the age range for the Senior Years as between 15 - 19. So again, it's possible she could be 18 in year 11, but I seriously doubt she'd be getting academic awards if she was two years behind where she should be. A recap of all the evidence concerning Emily's age is warranted given the sudden interest in Emily with her supposedly turning 18. While the above is not exactly concrete, we do have other significant evidence that points to Emily being 16. Starting on page 1, @Inka4life provides details and photographic evidence via a magazine and an old instagram reply from Emily. The instagram reply speaks for itself. While the Instagram reply isn't verifiable, the JRModels Magazine story is. I've found two straight awards for Emily in 2017 where they list her year age. Parallel to the JRModel's Magazine is a story I found about the JRModels Magazine photographer: Micheal Murchie. He deservedly took a lot of flak about some of the pictures he took of Emily Feld, and the story and caption to some of the photos explicitly listed Emily's age as 12 at the time. The article was from 2017. The final bit of concrete evidence we have is from last year. Posted again by inka4life on page 3, an Instagram story in July 2020 from a make-up artist who exclaims Emily is 15. There is also a preponderance of circumstantial evidence such as the school year/age on top of all of this. There is absolutely no contrary evidence out there that points to Emily being 18.

that's not something I've heard any school be like... academic awards are given at the end of the academic period not at the start/end of the next one, yes? What do they do for academic awards of those in the year who are graduating and leaving? Mail it to you?

There is *way* more evidence she just turned 16. Saw a recent social media account with her tagged in pictures celebrating her academic achievements at the Catholic School she goes to. It very clearly said she was in year 10, not year 12 ... so unless hers is a school that celebrates the academic achievements of someone who is two years behind where she's supposed to, it's just more evidence she's only 16. Saw another less savory site post a friends SM post about her birthday and added in "18yo" in the caption that did not exist in the original post once I dug it up. There are people out there determined to believe or force the idea that Emily is 18. I thought for sure we'd see it clear by now, as there is no real distinguishable advantage for models being 16 vs 18 in Australia... but she or whoever is running her social media accounts are being coy about it. I'm weirdly obsessed with Emily now and I gross myself out a little bit because of it... Yes, she's wildly attractive... she's developed at an age much younger than normal and more so than some models who are several years older than her even today... and all the red flags I see with her with personal experience knowing someone of her age who was exploited and abused for her looks. The fashion industry is a different beast than the beauty pageant industry, but it's not too far of a stretch to see a photographer like Clint take advantage of her. I shudder to think what someone with his reputation thought was appropriate during that session if he thought publishing photos of her in a see through top at the age of 13, or even 15, was also appropriate.

It feels like we get a photo set every couple of months of Kelly from CH that someone inevitably asks "when will we see the uncensored versions" ... I've lost count now.

Way to leave us in suspense, @Paul. 161 ... 🙄

are y'all really fighting about y'alls chances to land a supermodel based on her sexual orientation?