JazzyJas2.0
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by JazzyJas2.0
-
Bianca -
Miranda
-
-
-
-
Elsa I can see getting it I want Taylor to get it though!
-
#1. Gisele 2. Hailey 3. Candice All have great legs though.
-
Taylor. In order: 1. Taylor 2. Lais 3. Josephine 4. Sara 5. Elsa 6. Stella 7. Romee 8. Jasmine 9. Martha
Adriana. It's not even close. Adriana is both hotter and more beautiful than Mila. Adriana has a better face and body by far.
Candice is superior in every way. It's not even a fair comparison. lol Face: Candice. It's not even close Hair: Candice. Em's hair looks like dry straw. Body: Candice Legs: Candice. She's stands at a majestic 5'10" Emily is a dwarf at 5'7" Torso/Waist: Candice Emily has better boobs and butt. That's it.
She has nothing to arch Besides all she needs is to show her beautiful face and she's golden. She's the prettiest of the new angels anyways.
She's improved so much with her modeling
Thank you!!
If anyone can find the HQ Miu Miu please post them
True. Tbh I think Abigail makes a good glamour/lingerie model because her body is just spectacular. Besides, you can like anyone who want. It's your taste. This is just my 2 cents. Oh I totally agree that Sophia is an asshole for sure. Those comments don't even apply to Kate. And lol @ she should buy herself Kate's face Kate Upton > than any IG model IMO. I think Kate reminds me of a 1950s American pin up. Even though I think Irina Shayk is kind of beautiful and > than any IG model she actually reminds me more of a common IG model than Kate does. But yeah, I think Lily-Rose looks best when she's smiling (her smile is beautiful) or doing candid pics. When she tries it seems she comes across as flat or dead. I think Lily has something very 'chic' about her. But yeah I followed her because she's Vanessa's daughter and I love Vanessa Paradise too! I find it cute how Lily idolizes and always posts pic of her mom.
No, they're not literally bitches. "Basic bitch" is just a term here used in America to describe somebody who acts like they're great/special/unique but they're the complete opposite: they're common, boring and you can find a million other people just like them. Perhaps, I should've just used a better word/term. Abigail & co are not bad or ugly but they're just uninspiring. The fact that they're popular with men doesn't mean anything since a lot of men would be happy with anything with hair, boobs, and female parts. Though Abigail has a great body that's pretty much it. I do understand she's a glamour model but I don't like anything about her or her personality. Especially that horrifically vapid personality. I actually love Dita, she's very classy woman even though some people might consider her profession anything but. That being said not all IG models are "basic" some are actually unique but they're very very rare. Taylor couldn't be basic even if she tried, lol, she's stands out in every way not only because perfectly gorgeous but she's elegant, tall and has the IT factor that nearly every instagram model lacks. Another reason I can't stand IG models is because a lot of the time they have very visible, tacky plastic surgery and I'm not a fan of the plastic, unnatural, caked up makeup look. Most IG models have a technical type of prettiness but I would never EVER call them beautiful. Beauty is unique, special, regal and sometimes even a bit imperfect. These words by Sophia towards Kate Upton can apply to 98% of all instagram "models" Basic IG model = cheap. Beautiful model = majestic The difference is very obvious. It's like the difference between a fake Louis Vuitton bag and a real one, in terms of beauty.
dailymail
VS Valetine's Day 2016 http://www.gloriasmood.com/2016/02/07/love-me-more/
IG: jen_king
IG: victoriassecret
IG: davidbellmere posted June 9
IG: sarasampaio VS
VS website headers
VS website headers
