"BEAUTY News, NEWS, NEWS" - miss VOGUE Germany March 1989 by Michel Comte, Eric Boman, Hans Feurer - also showing Talisa Soto, unknown

On 5/1/2013 at 11:30 PM, MizzElin said:

Erreuno Ad 1988

Photographer: Eddy Kohli

http://thumbnails105.imagebam.com/25208/e253c9252071362.jpg

Does anyone still have this image? 

Ana Yugoslavia November /December 1987

 

 

 

 

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

Stephanie Seymour for Crisca by Escada, fall/winter 1992 (with Shana Zadrick)

my scans

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view  Image hidden for guestsSign in to view          

Stephanie Seymour for Ralph Lauren, 1992

my scan

Stephanie Seymour for Fendi, 1991

my scan

 

Stephanie Seymour for Gianni Versace, 1991

my scan

Stephanie Seymour for Prada, 1991

my scan

from an Allure magazine, 1992 by Sante D'Orazio

my scans

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view 

DOMANI 1991 (+ Kara Young)

Photographer: unknown

my scans

 

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

"Rain check", Stephanie Seymour & Karen Mulder by Sante D'Orazio, Allure march 1992

my scans

     Image hidden for guestsSign in to view  

Edited June 3, 20215 yr by ser_franklin
re-scanned for better quality

Stephanie Seymour with Charlie Haugk, may 1990, wearing Gianfranco Ferre', by Alberto Tolot

my scan

 

Edited June 4, 20215 yr by ser_franklin
re-scanned for better quality

Great content, ser_franklin, but allow me to give you some tech advice with scanning: If you're going to take all of the time to handle the originals and put them on a scanner, you need to be scanning at 300dpi minimum resolution, maybe even 400dpi.  Keep the originals, and then process another copy with a very subtle blur of only 2-3 pixes (I forgot the exact settings), which won't affect details but will eliminate the interference patterns of the dots on computer screens so the scans look good at any zoom level.

 

If you search my posts you can see examples of how scans look with these settings. Here's one:

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

On 5/31/2021 at 7:18 PM, slacker said:

Great content, ser_franklin, but allow me to give you some tech advice with scanning: If you're going to take all of the time to handle the originals and put them on a scanner, you need to be scanning at 300dpi minimum resolution, maybe even 400dpi.  Keep the originals, and then process another copy with a very subtle blur of only 2-3 pixes (I forgot the exact settings), which won't affect details but will eliminate the interference patterns of the dots on computer screens so the scans look good at any zoom level.

 

If you search my posts you can see examples of how scans look with these settings. Here's one:

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

Thanks for the hints and suggestions... Technology is not my forte 🥴, but i'll give it another go soon, since I have more scans as well 👍🏽

2 hours ago, ser_franklin said:

Thanks for the hints and suggestions... Technology is not my forte 🥴, but i'll give it another go soon, since I have more scans as well 👍🏽

 

You'll thank me later, trust me! Here's another post from a few years ago with my scans, and in the post I said "600 dpi, no blur or descreening," which is maybe overkill, but no doubt the best quality:

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

One more:

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

Escada 1991
Scanned by me
 

Apple M1 & VueScan 9
Epson V550 - 24Bit Color - 400ppi
Restoration & Color Corrections - Adobe Photoshop
Uncompressed TIFF File & Lossy JPEG
 

JPEG Image(s) -  (TIFF Files shown as attachments)
 

Stephanie Seymour - Escada.tif

4 hours ago, fumi said:

Escada 1991
Scanned by me
 

Apple M1 & VueScan 9
Epson V550 - 24Bit Color - 400ppi
Restoration & Color Corrections - Adobe Photoshop
Uncompressed TIFF File & Lossy JPEG
 

JPEG Image(s) -  (TIFF Files shown as attachments)
 

Stephanie Seymour - Escada.tif 34.45 MB · 1 download

Amazing!

21 hours ago, slacker said:

 

You'll thank me later, trust me! Here's another post from a few years ago with my scans, and in the post I said "600 dpi, no blur or descreening," which is maybe overkill, but no doubt the best quality:

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

One more:

Image hidden for guestsSign in to view

 

i have rescanned the Sante D'Orazio editorial, which was probably the most problematic since the rain in the editorial amplified those dots even more....should be a little improved now 

i was reminded about these pages from a circa 1994 German fashion catalogue, i had only saved Stephanie's pages off of it, so don't recall much detail about it, but here they are 

           

Stephanie Seymour for Almay, 1989

my scan