Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Featured Replies

WARNING NUDITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :chicken: :brows: :chicken: :brows: :chicken: :brows: :chicken:

It's Rob's fault

mORE TO COME....

Num__riser0041.jpg Num__riser0042.jpg Num__riser0043.jpg

WARNING :woot: FRENCH NAKED WOMEN!!!!!!

Could be my fault? :beating:

Ps : she was 19 not 17

Num__riser0044.jpg Num__riser0045.jpg Num__riser0046.jpg Num__riser0047.jpg

WARNING :chicken: :chicken: :chicken: oh, never mind! Just enjoy the beauty!

Thanx classy :kiss: & magic :kiss:

Num__riser0048.jpg Num__riser0049.jpg Num__riser0050.jpg

I love those photos. They are just gorgeous! She looks amazing in them! Thanks Kiki!!

does anyone can post or repost this photo but bigger? Kiki will be very happy...

Num__riser0051.jpg

Ondine's tears

André Rau, French Marie-Claire, May 2001

In this editorial the journalist titled "Laetitia Casta sans trucages" [without special effects]

where one guesses that she wears something in the lower right corner of the portrait.

Let us compare with the fake found by Moiselles: it's clearly not her body.

  • Firstly with such an expression of her face, there is no need to show more.
  • Into the bargain the tears are not compatible with the Lotus position even without any clothes.
  • The fake builder has been enough honest to sign his work with his circular logo on the wall behind the right shoulder.
  • After a classical mirror inversion of the original photo, he reoriented the inclination of the head.
  • He has hidden the ears behind a totally new black hair.
  • He thought that a touch of a blue eyeshadow was more artistic <_< in a B&W photo.
  • Finally the pose of the body is more for a softly erotic magazine for `modern man' :laugh:
    than for any glossy magazines for women.

About the OrengeO's artistic choices :yuckky: for the April Fools' Day,

--depending of his/her age and his/her cultural concept of the private life which could depend of the country--,

it's a shame to publish these paparrazi pictures particularly when there are a child or a young girl

with or worst without blur. Even the worst of chief editors of gossip magazines would not dare to publish

these `works' because the magazine could be sued or the web site closed.

Yes, you could publish the Anchio's photo --fully naked--

because this nice dog really played in Le Grand Appartement with Francesca.

But avoid publishing photos of people who are too young to be actors.

On others photos don't you guess you and other big "fans" :cry:

that Laetitia protects her baby against the flashes of paparrazi.

Do you think that Laetitia will enjoy finding these photos and the artistic comments of "fans"? :o

If it is that to be a "fan," I am happy to not be a "fan."

Hence the :heart: Ondine's :heart: tears that are not fake.

plaetitia31.JPG
post-644-0-1446020313-16607_thumb.jpg

André Rau, French Marie-Claire, May 2001

Do you think that Laetitia will enjoy finding these photos and the artistic comments of "fans"? :o

If it is that to be a "fan," I am happy to not be a "fan."

Hence the :heart: Ondine's :heart: tears that are not fake.

Ondine's tears

post-19937-0-1446020313-5634_thumb.jpg

André Rau, French Marie-Claire, May 2001

In this editorial the journalist titled "Laetitia Casta sans trucages" [without special effects]

where one guesses that she wears something in the lower right corner of the portrait.

Let us compare with the fake found by Moiselles: it's clearly not her body.

  • Firstly with such an expression of her face, there is no need to show more.
  • Into the bargain the tears are not compatible with the Lotus position even without any clothes.
  • The fake builder has been enough honest to sign his work with his circular logo on the wall behind the right shoulder.
  • After a classical mirror inversion of the original photo, he reoriented the inclination of the head.
  • He has hidden the ears behind a totally new black hair.
  • He thought that a touch of a blue eyeshadow was more artistic <_< in a B&W photo.
  • Finally the pose of the body is more for a softly erotic magazine for `modern man' :laugh:

    than for any glossy magazines for women.

About the OrengeO's artistic choices :yuckky: for the April Fools' Day,

--depending of his/her age and his/her cultural concept of the private life which could depend of the country--,

it's a shame to publish these paparrazi pictures particularly when there are a child or a young girl

with or worst without blur. Even the worst of chief editors of gossip magazines would not dare to publish

these `works' because the magazine could be sued or the web site closed.

Yes, you could publish the Anchio's photo --fully naked--

because this nice dog really played in Le Grand Appartement with Francesca.

But avoid publishing photos of people who are too young to be actors.

On others photos don't you guess you and other big "fans" :cry:

that Laetitia protects her baby against the flashes of paparrazi.

Do you think that Laetitia will enjoy finding these photos and the artistic comments of "fans"? :o

If it is that to be a "fan," I am happy to not be a "fan."

Hence the :heart: Ondine's :heart: tears that are not fake.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.