So I was looking around tumblr and I ran into these... needless to say I was absolutely mortified. Sure we've all seen the little girls in lingerie before (O.o ew), then we had the Hailey Clauson debacle, but this takes it to a whole new level of wrong imo. The question stands, has the has the fashion industry gone to far in regards to the sexualization of children? and why aren't parents taking a more pro-active stance in their children's career?

French Line Offers Lingerie for Girls As Young As Four

When it comes to the sexualization of young girls, France keeps stirring controversy.

First, there was the 10-year-old model styled in a very grown-up way in a Vogue Paris spread that many found unsettling, if not downright disturbing. Now, a new faux pas: a French lingerie line for kids that features girls prancing around in bras on its website.

Read More: http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/08/19/french...-young-as-four/

Um wow. Thats just wrong!

Wtf are children going to do w/lingerie???

Pic #3, what the heck well, all of them, but especially the 3rd one... gross.

Ok, I might be fighting a lonely fight here but...

1, Where are the pics with children in lingerie?

2, Where is the site with the children in lingerie?

3, What are these weird pictures for and expecially, who made them?

4, Where is Kiki to give us some normal arguments?

5, Didn´t we talked about this issue before?

The company was Jours Apres Lunes.

http://www.jours-apres-lunes.com/

(They still have kids modeling lingerie, so be forewarned)

And here's a pictures of the kids in lingerie.

http://img576.imageshack.us/img576/3693/st...ursapreslun.jpg

The person who had the tumblr said it was for a line of children/adults denim/clothing line. O.o

Update: The person who had the pictures up was trolled hard by a bunch of people and has taken the images down. (Y)

Charlotte Free posted this on her official tumblr in regards to the image:

THIS IS THE CREEPIEST SHIT IVE EVER SEEN BECAUSE IVE NEVER SEEN CHILD PORN

Any adult involved in the sexualization of a child is doing something wrong. If anyone knows the difference between a pervert and an artist its me. And that was just a pervert getting away with it. If it was a little girl running topless at the beach maybe that would be different. But they had to tell the little girl to take her top off. They had to tell the little boy to put his head on jer chest like that…sexualization of a child is where i say art needs to be censored. So what if shes under developed, shes posing like a full grown adult. Theres nothing innocent about those poses. Anyone defending these photos saying they are art needs to screw their heads back on for a minute and realize.. Those children are too young to decide if they want to pose nude or even work at all. Any adult who enjoys this is taking forbidden fruit from an innocent child. And every adult involved in putting that little girl in front of the camera topless will pay for it with karma. Anyone who thinks those photos were innocent is a moron and should not have children

Go Charlotte!

Oh, thank you for the added material and info now I know we dicussed this before, isn´t it the same issue? I remember those pics with kids in lingerie for sure - not these on top though.

Those are just... weird. I mean, line of clothing? I´m scared by it, wouldn´t buy it in million years for my kids if I had some. What were these guys thinking...?

Why the hell parents of these kids allowed such thing?

Too many questions. It´s just wrong on so many levels - the photographer, the parents, and... hell, it´s not even artistic, damn

Someone said my name?

Pick me, pick me!!

:shock:

Whoever is responsible for that shit, hate him. This is more than just wrong.