March 23, 200619 yr Thanks Caha for actually posting pics of your claim. It seems that everyone else who claims that she's natural just say it because they love her blindly . I gather most of those people don't realize fake boobs before or they just lack the knowledge on how to detect them. Therefore, their opinion about them being "real" is nulled. Check this boob game out- then you get an idea on the real/fake boobs: http://www.bellazon.com/main/index.php?showtopic=2067. I scored 17/20- so I have some idea about them. If you posted those pics to prove they don't "stay up" silicone isn't suppose to! Now the pics to me does not exonerate her boobs in any way. In detecting fake boobs, you have to look at the CONTOUR of the breast- to see if they seem a bit too ballonlike and round. Real breasts for the most part, are not as round, but have more of a pear- like shape. Also, fyi, actress Kate Beckinsale supposedly has a clause in her contract saying she won't be shot past a certain degree angle when she's bent over because her silicone slides! Therefore, going back to Izabel, it could be that the silicone bags are weighted down, remember that they are not attached to anything inside the breast. Without a bra, those pics prove my point rather than disprove it. Again, go to the link on the boob game. Also, I've had girlfriends who are top heavy and size 2 or 4, when they're like 14 so I know it's possible. However, I don't believe Izabel is like that judging from the shape and contours of her breasts. Look again: And Again: Nice, but OBVIOUSLY the talent of a surgeon! Still love her anyways!
March 24, 200619 yr Fake or not I don't care, she's hot!And just as a personal preference I prefer small breasts!
March 24, 200619 yr Thanks Caha for actually posting pics of your claim. It seems that everyone else who claims that she's natural just say it because they love her blindly . I gather most of those people don't realize fake boobs before or they just lack the knowledge on how to detect them. Therefore, their opinion about them being "real" is nulled. Check this boob game out- then you get an idea on the real/fake boobs: http://www.bellazon.com/main/index.php?showtopic=2067. I scored 17/20- so I have some idea about them.If you posted those pics to prove they don't "stay up" silicone isn't suppose to! Now the pics to me does not exonerate her boobs in any way. In detecting fake boobs, you have to look at the CONTOUR of the breast- to see if they seem a bit too ballonlike and round. Real breasts for the most part, are not as round, but have more of a pear- like shape. Also, fyi, actress Kate Beckinsale supposedly has a clause in her contract saying she won't be shot past a certain degree angle when she's bent over because her silicone slides! Therefore, going back to Izabel, it could be that the silicone bags are weighted down, remember that they are not attached to anything inside the breast. Without a bra, those pics prove my point rather than disprove it. Again, go to the link on the boob game. Also, I've had girlfriends who are top heavy and size 2 or 4, when they're like 14 so I know it's possible. However, I don't believe Izabel is like that judging from the shape and contours of her breasts. Look again: And Again: Nice, but OBVIOUSLY the talent of a surgeon! Still love her anyways! This is just a misguided post. First of all and most notable, you can't make your point with pictures especially when a pic is two dimensional or planar. Yet you rant about shape, which is three dimensional or shows depth. And second--a kicker, you draw your conclusion on two pics that are entirely different causing your point to be pointless. In one pic her tits are supported in a top (KEY WORD: Supported meaning lifted. If you have ever taken off a bikini top/bra on a chick w/large breasts, then you would know tits are held up in the cups. If tits aren't lifted and held in place by the cups and tie in the back, tits just jump out) and the other pic they are not--and are abit drooping; like most of her pics w/o support. Furthermore, in both pics her tits are obscured, you can't see them clearly. So how can you draw your conclusion. Breast look entirely different in a top, especially tops where they can "push up" or have inserts or pads.
March 24, 200619 yr Thanks Caha for actually posting pics of your claim. It seems that everyone else who claims that she's natural just say it because they love her blindly . I gather most of those people don't realize fake boobs before or they just lack the knowledge on how to detect them. Therefore, their opinion about them being "real" is nulled. Check this boob game out- then you get an idea on the real/fake boobs: http://www.bellazon.com/main/index.php?showtopic=2067. I scored 17/20- so I have some idea about them. If you posted those pics to prove they don't "stay up" silicone isn't suppose to! Now the pics to me does not exonerate her boobs in any way. In detecting fake boobs, you have to look at the CONTOUR of the breast- to see if they seem a bit too ballonlike and round. Real breasts for the most part, are not as round, but have more of a pear- like shape. Also, fyi, actress Kate Beckinsale supposedly has a clause in her contract saying she won't be shot past a certain degree angle when she's bent over because her silicone slides! Therefore, going back to Izabel, it could be that the silicone bags are weighted down, remember that they are not attached to anything inside the breast. Without a bra, those pics prove my point rather than disprove it. Again, go to the link on the boob game. Also, I've had girlfriends who are top heavy and size 2 or 4, when they're like 14 so I know it's possible. However, I don't believe Izabel is like that judging from the shape and contours of her breasts. Look again: And Again: Nice, but OBVIOUSLY the talent of a surgeon! Still love her anyways! This is just a misguided post. First of all and most notable, you can't make your point with pictures especially when a pic is two dimensional or planar. Yet you rant about shape, which is three dimensional or shows depth. And second--a kicker, you draw your conclusion on two pics that are entirely different causing your point to be pointless. In one pic her tits are supported in a top (KEY WORD: Supported meaning lifted. If you have ever taken off a bikini top/bra on a chick w/large breasts, then you would know tits are held up in the cups. If tits aren't lifted and held in place by the cups and tie in the back, tits just jump out) and the other pic they are not--and are abit drooping; like most of her pics w/o support. Furthermore, in both pics her tits are obscured, you can't see them clearly. So how can you draw your conclusion. Breast look entirely different in a top, especially tops where they can "push up" or have inserts or pads. Yeh Fivefluouracil, My Post was in response to CAHA's PICTURES on the PREVIOUS page. I wasn't talking about my pictures. Okay, and if you're telling me you can't tell the SHAPE of an object from a PICTURE- what the heck other medium do we have?? Unless you're going to meet Izabel and personally strip her down, (which I'll volunteer since I live near her ) there is no other BUT a "planar" way!! You mean you can't tell shapes like pears and oranges from a picture? And again, why don't you go to that link I posted, play the boobie game, recognize some fake boobies then come back and have a real discussion on this. Maybe I should post some fake boobs on here that way you people won't be so adamant in immediately saying NoOooO! and actually have a decent analysis against my argument , I would love to have a good debate on, so long as it's insightful.<googles searches for some fake boobies>
March 24, 200619 yr I can see that this discussion is going to get out of hand here, just like it does everywhere else. With that, this is the END OF THE DISCUSSION. If you'd like to carry it on, do so in a PM and not here. Any further posts discussing the matter will be deleted and you will be warned.
March 25, 200619 yr There is 2 full page pics of izabel in vogue hommes.One is just herself and the other one is with doutzen
March 29, 200619 yr I dont know if its the darker hair or what but she looks really good in those pics.
March 29, 200619 yr A brief mention of Adriana and IzabelI did a search to see if it had been posted even though it has today's date on it. It didn't come up.MOUAWAD LAUNCHES BRONZE DIAMONDS29 March 2006 New York-based jeweler Mouawad has launched its new signature collection Bronze Diamonds, which features diamonds set in 18-karat gold. As part of Mouawad
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.