I've been thinking about how I could make the fairest evaluation and have come to

the conclusion that I will devide the views through the posts. Thus, it is an average of

views by post and would represent the interests of all visitors for the models best.

Please note that nobody knows what´s posted in every model thread before he view

every single post, that mean, nobody knows before if there are pictures or only

comments .... I think that´s a fair kind of evaluation !

I will renew this list on 01.07.2010 and quaterly continue than.

Comments, discussions, suggestions / improvements are appreciated.

Please tell us what you think about this report.

^ I think you could title the second list as "Model threads with the most lurkers." I wonder though whether the view count for the models with subforums is... bloated. For example, three new posts spread over three threads in a subforum would equate to three views from one member to see them all, whereas in a standard thread the three new posts would equate to only one view.

I will also create a list without the models in the Subforums. I expect some surprises .....

You could consider the "age" of the threads, Candice's was opened in late 2006, Daria's in 2004, it's 50% days more.

I was thinking the same .

I know this might have been discused before.. but I have one question.

Why don't we have subforums for Doutzen, Laetitia, and others who already have a lot of pages?

^ Probably because sorting all the posts would be a huge hassle, and if the mods/admins did it for one thread, they would have to do it for all threads that reached x number of pages over time. Plus, I think the subforums went to the favorite models of the forum founders and that's it. Might as well keep it that way to avoid arguments over who should get a subforum and who shouldn't.

^Tnx for explanation..

I was always curious about that