Those paparazzi pics are so intrusive. Don't like it.

Don't know. Those pics look awfully staged to me.

Paparazzi are always intrusive. But at least it's during a photoshoot.
Like an actor on the set of a video shoot.

She must have known the pap was there and that her top would go see-through, but she strikes me as the least insecure person alive so I can't believe it was staged. I would feel sorry for her if she became conscious of her actions just because the paps are around, so I say good on her.

Others:

 

Slight Nudity

http://postimg.org/image/llajyzsg7/

http://s9.postimg.org/nijep45en/Toni_Garrn_poses_topless_for_a_photoshoot_in_St.jpg

http://s9.postimg.org/vzix01a3j/Toni_Garrn_poses_topless_for_a_photoshoot_in_St.jpg

mirror.co.uk

Edited December 8, 201311 yr by PinkCouture
Added nudity warning

I wonder what they are shooting. Doesn't look like VS to me. Looks like Andreaa left already.

This upsets me:

 

@RealToniGarrn:

Never gonna do what photographers ask me to do on jobs in st barths again..unless it includes jumping around in thick ski overalls #stalkers

 

This upsets me:

 

@RealToniGarrn:

Never gonna do what photographers ask me to do on jobs in st barths again..unless it includes jumping around in thick ski overalls #stalkers

 

 

 

Seems like it's really getting to her.

Her being topless in a fashion magazine is not the same as the pics being in every gossip mag from dailymail to mirror to bild. Also for an editorial only the best shots get chosen and it usually looks aesthetic. 

Not to mention it's just creepy that some random stranger took these pictures of her. 

^ ^ I was referring to the "stalkers" part as what's getting to her, nothing to do with her 'boobs' (to use your lexicon). The newspapers/websites that published the photos (Daily Mail, Mirror, Sun etc.) have millions of daily visitors and re-tweeters on twitter, so I doubt she cares (or knows) what we post. Just saying (again using your lexicon - not that it offers anything other than a copout).

Her being topless in a fashion magazine is not the same as the pics being in every gossip mag from dailymail to mirror to bild. Also for an editorial only the best shots get chosen and it usually looks aesthetic. 

Not to mention it's just creepy that some random stranger took these pictures of her. 

She's dating Leo and is surprised papparazzi are all over her?

Should I delete the pics ? she looks pretty and I thought it was a part of her job (I saw a lot of pics of Kate Moss like that before).

Maybe this second time around is what drove her over the edge? She had those pictures released in March, and now it's happening again, all in St. Barths.

 

Like others said, I'm sure she's just mad that she is being exposed via strangers and creeps. When the editorial images come out the nudity is presented in a much different context than unflattering, grainy pap pictures on the beach. 

 

St. Barths must be crawling with paparazzi now. It's become too famous for photoshoots, especially VS shoots. Toni probably means that she won't do nudity in St. Barth's again.

Then she shouldn't complain.

 

Never gonna do what photographers ask me to do on jobs in st barths again..unless it includes jumping around in thick ski overalls #stalkers

 

 

Then she shouldn't complain.

 

Never gonna do what photographers ask me to do on jobs in st barths again..unless it includes jumping around in thick ski overalls #stalkers

 

She has every right to complain. It's kinda gross how some people expect women to just accept objectification.

 

No need to take the pics down. Don't think bellazon makes any difference, when they are already on the dailymail, etc.

 

 

 

Then she shouldn't complain.

 

Never gonna do what photographers ask me to do on jobs in st barths again..unless it includes jumping around in thick ski overalls #stalkers

 

She has every right to complain. It's kinda gross how some people expect women to just accept objectification.

 

No need to take the pics down. Don't think bellazon makes any difference, when they are already on the dailymail, etc.

 

That was a fotoshoot. She can't choose the location or what she's wearing.

 

That was a fotoshoot. She can't choose the location or what she's wearing.

What? Of course she can. She took a job. Flew to (very lovely paradise) St. Barths.

"Someone" didn't just take creepy pictures, but sold them to various tabloids without her consent. She has every right to be angry.

It was on a public beach that is regular with paps.

If you go to LA and have a lunch at the Ivy, are you seriously going to complain that someone took your picture?

Not to mention the whole paparazzi/celebrity relationship.

Also, I want to make this very clear, I'm not hating on Toni personally, I just hate general BS that celebrities say these days.

If you're not comfortable showing your skin in public, pick a job in some photo studio.

 

Again, I think she was complaining about the stalking, not the fact she was topless.

 

Anyways, she's transfering in Puerto Rico so I guess she's on her way to London already::

 

@RealToniGarrn:

Gotta make the most out of this transfer in Pueto Rico @joansmalls I like your country so far!! pic.twitter.com/HLTJP5jefa