May 3, 200619 yr careful . . . look at the seeds winning East: 1(Ottawa) 2(Carolina) 3(Jersey) 4(Buffalo) West: 8(Edmonton) 7(Colorado) and whatever San Jose was . . . with Anaheim winning to force game 7. If the trend continues . . . it will be the top four seads winning in the East but losing in the West.
May 4, 200619 yr I want to take a stick to Selanne's head. Stay the fuck AWAY from my goalie you stupid little shit
May 4, 200619 yr Who do the av's play in the second round? Edmonton. Who has been phenomenal all year so
May 4, 200619 yr Don't what? Oh, and its the Ducks . . . Semi's . . . West San Jose vs Edmonton Colorado vs Anaheim East Ottawa vs Buffalo Carolina vs New Jersey
May 4, 200619 yr You know, if I had wanted to listen to the "hahaha" bullshit, I'd find someone who was better at it then you are. A team lost tonight because no one showed up by the goalie and two players. This upsets me. You might think it's funny. I do not. And I have about had it. So unless you have something constructive to add instead of your usual crap, please do not talk to me.
May 4, 200619 yr I actually wasn't trying to say "ha ha" . . . and I'am sorry if I came off a such. I was just whistling at the irony of the top 4 teams swapping conferance to conferance as I might have predicted. I wasn't laughing at all, I felt bad about how bad Calgary was playing, because I actually was rooting for Calgary as well, my Manager is from Calagry and she is gonna be in a bad mood tommorow. And I think adding the semi-final match-ups constitutes as constructive.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.