August 31, 200717 yr I don't care about it I see no problem about having implants What's the problem about it?
August 31, 200717 yr ha ha, yeah but I quite enjoyed the whole movie, and the part "durka durka mohammed dzihad" too The Star Wars geeks like me enjoyed the scene after this, where he goes into the bar. It's exactly like the "Cantina scene" in the first Star Wars, even the music is the same...except reversed. As far as implants... I look at them - in the case of models - as reasonable. I mean, in the case of VS models, modeling lingerie is their job. Heck, in that case the implants are probably tax-deductable.
August 31, 200717 yr WHAT???!!! C'mon, more than half of their current angels have fake boobs. Who do you think that managed to fill those bras? Mother nature? I don't think so....try father surgeon As soon as you have something more than your opinion stated as fact, let us know. Because basing it on yet another rule us humans try to pin on Mother Nature is absolutely ridiculous. In a previous post you cited Izabel and Ale as having implants and I have to say if it took implants for them to get to the modest size they're at now, then that is just sad! Plus, Ale has said in an interview she'd considered getting implants but decided not to due to a bad experience having surgery on her ears. I mean, that's a pretty bizarre thing for a model supposedly with implants to say! Plus, there are tons of beautiful women trying to make it in the modeling world, so what's one thing that would put Ale, Izabel, etc., over the top and into major success? Perhaps being slightly (and naturally) more well-endowed than most (which I don't even think they are). It's not impossible in the slightest.
August 31, 200717 yr EVERYBODY IS GUESSING here, because none of us went to Ale or Iza or GIsele and touched their boobs to see if they are real, right? And you kind of making it seem more serious than it is. Nobody is judging here, it was just a discution about how to recognise implants and I said that TO ME those girls look like they have them. I'm not a surgeon, so my word is not law, it's just an OPINION like your's or his or hers
August 31, 200717 yr ha ha, yeah but I quite enjoyed the whole movie, and the part "durka durka mohammed dzihad" too The Star Wars geeks like me enjoyed the scene after this, where he goes into the bar. It's exactly like the "Cantina scene" in the first Star Wars, even the music is the same...except reversed. As far as implants... I look at them - in the case of models - as reasonable. I mean, in the case of VS models, modeling lingerie is their job. Heck, in that case the implants are probably tax-deductable. yeah, that one was great too I also loved that one about trust....
August 31, 200717 yr I don't care about it I see no problem about having implants What's the problem about it? I agree Don't see what is the problem when a model gets implants while a billions of regular people can just get implants any time they would like and nobody would say anything bad, they make a big deal out of nothing IMO. It's there job anyways to look great, nobody is perfect which means that all of them have inperfections (in some maybe impossible to see but they are there in hiding ) if it means for them feeling better about themselfs I would tell them to go ahead, the inner beauty shines 1000 x better anyways, without personality your nothing
August 31, 200717 yr yeah, that one was great too I also loved that one about trust.... <---will never die
August 31, 200717 yr yeah, that one was great too I also loved that one about trust.... <---will never die
September 1, 200717 yr yah they arent that big anyways i donno why people whould think they are fake...... and i donno what cup indicator you have been useing because if their barely b's then the girls i know must be negative A's. :rofl: Love you Strawberry. :heart:
September 1, 200717 yr Fake boobs still look nice. I really wouldn't mind if I had a girlfriend with fake knockers. As long as they look..."human"...
September 1, 200717 yr this thread is hilarious. Their is an awesome article about beauty standards in the new vanity fair...ill try and scan it. its talk about fashion sexy vs. men's sexymost of the angels barely have boobs anyways..... and the ones that do ....im sure its a mix.ale and izabel common?!?!?!
September 1, 200717 yr this thread is hilarious. Their is an awesome article about beauty standards in the new vanity fair...ill try and scan it. its talk about fashion sexy vs. men's sexyIsn't "sexy" really supposed to be about attraction to the opposite sex? Or if one feels attractive to the opposite sex?I thought the term for "fashion sexy" was "glamorous."No (straight) guy turns to another, commenting on a girl, and says, "Boy, she really looks glamorous."That's how I understand it, anyway.
September 1, 200717 yr sexy is being so blatently beautiful you just wanna **** the person right where they stand. guy girl w/ebut fashion is trying to make people see beauty as something else....."not obvious" its in the article.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.