Jade Bahr
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Jade Bahr
-
Bit more input about the (possible) running time. Did anyone know the maximum running time for a feature film in Cannes? Can't find anything about such a rule except for short films: https://www.festival-cannes.com/en/participer/rules?id=2 -
-
No bad blood between Leo & Gigi
KOTFM update. Source: Scorsese’s “Flower Moon” Will Go to Cannes If He Can Cut it Down from Three Hours, 20 Minutes With the Oscars coming into view, and the end of the 2023 awards season, we turn out attention to the next round of movies. Martin Scorsese’s “Killers of the Flower Moon” is at the top of all lists for this year’s new crop. Starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro, “Flower Moon” is set in the West in the 1920s, and it’s based on the book by David Grann. The story concerns the real life murders of Native Americans in Oklahoma when their land is discovered to be sitting on oil fields. I’m told that the Cannes Film Festival is chomping at the bit to premiere the film, not in competition and not for opening night. It would be just the prestige of that trio walking the red carpet. So what’s the issue? I’m told by sources that “Flower Moon” is currently clocking in at three hours, twenty minutes. This is nothing new for Scorsese, whose every new film starts at super sized until Oscar winning editor Thelma Schoonmaker summons a succinct two and a half hour final cut out of Scorsese’s masterful shots. But Cannes can’t program such a long film, so they’re waiting to see how this all works out. So is Apple. They wrote the check for all this. And they’ve got to promise Cannes the film will have a real theatrical run before streaming, and in every country, especially France. Stay tuned… Source
Personally I think winning the Oscar is not only about giving a great performance but also giving this great performance to the right time. I mean it's kinda ironic that Colin Farrell missed out for many years for being the too-handsome younger actor just to loose now against Butler - just when he finally gets in the "usual" age range for best actor. Even though I have to admit movies like Swat, Total Recall, Miami Vice etc did him no favour in the past. I still feel bad for Andrew Garfield who just had unbelievably bad timing last year for a similar type of performance. I mean is anybody even remembering for which movie Will Smith won? Just tragic 🤣 Same for Taron Egerton. He was as amazing in Rocketman as was Malik in Bohemian Rhapsody. But giving the oscar 2 years in a row to the actor who's playing a musician in a biopic? Not happening. Nobody had a chance against JOKER sure but Egerton wasn't even nominated. Be still my heart. I also think it will be hard for Colin to win the damn oscar like ever. I mean this were his first major nominations in -what- 30 years? I hope the 2nd ones don't take this long again 🙈 Also when it comes to the best actor race the movie has to be at least a contender for best picture otherwise your chances to win are already bad. I think that is what happening to Brendan Fraser. THE WHALE is considered as "weak movie" aka not nominated for BP. What I like about Austins most likely win that he proofs a young -former disney kid- handsome actor can win the oscar. It's not like this win is so self-evident here.
^thx for your review 🥰 In germany the release of the movie is only in April. So I guess I have to wait until then 😩
Pretty in pink 💖 (fanpage just stated 'new pics')
More from Isabella Lombardini
^damn! @AliceT how is Brendan F in The Whale? Still haven't seen the movie.
^he probably cut the shooting star for this particular reason when he recreate the night sky because like you said with deleting the scene of this motive it became indeed kinda pointless. Also this science dude had probably complained again with claiming there was no shooting star at this night to this hour 🤣 Always liked this deleted scene because it also shows Jack and Rose singing 'Come Josephine' together. Another motive which had worked even better with including this scene in the final cut. But actually I think it of most of the deleted scenes. There are so many lost parallels and connections and also many scenes who gave the other characters more depth. I will never understand why Cameron never agreed to make an extended cut for the fans while he made TWO for Avatar. Trivia: The original cut was 6 hours long what means there is tons of unseen footage out there 😭
^I can answer the sky question (it was already changed in the 2012 version): https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/arts-post/post/titanic-night-sky-adjusted-after-neil-degrasse-tyson-criticized-james-cameron/2012/04/03/gIQAZyZItS_blog.html But I didn't notice the absence of Roses laugh. Are you sure about that?
credit to valeriaferreiramakeup
Chanel pre BAFTA party credit to peterluxhair
credit to isabellalombardini
credit to hellodergisi Some input
Just another Austin praising Leo round. Austin Butler Looked Up to Leonardo DiCaprio's Career When He Was Younger Austin Butler is opening up about looking up to Leonardo DiCaprio. The 31-year-old Oscar nominated Elvis star recently opened up about whose career he thought his would look like when he was a teenager doing auditions, and he noted Leo, who also started out at a young age. “I started looking at a lot of different people’s careers. And Leo, when I was about 15, became that guy, because he’d made that transition [from child actor]. Every film that he chose, you could see the level of passion that he still had for the work,” Austin shared with Vanity Fair. “And that’s been a surreal thing, looking back at what my dreams were when I was 15, and then getting to work with the people that he got to work with, getting to be on set with him. There’s a lot of these pinch-me moments in my life and that’s definitely one of them.” “I remember being younger, being 16 or something, and comparing myself to what I saw in Leo’s career when he was 19 or something, going from Gilbert Grape and Basketball Diaries and then Titanic. I was 20 and I was looking back and going, ‘Oh, no, my dreams are never going to come true in the same way,’” he added. “I mean, I had times where I just thought, Oh, maybe it’ll never happen or I’ll never get those opportunities. But now, in retrospect, I can look back and go, if I had some film that hit really big when I was younger, I wouldn’t have had to keep going back to the drawing board and saying, ‘How do you get better at this?’” Source
^And here we go again. Maybe better in your opinion but not necessarily in Leos lol You don't even know the man and yet wants to tell him how he could live a better life. It's really hilarious sometimes. I really would like to see your faces when a complete stranger would come knocking at your door and telling you how you guys have to change your lifes. But only talking his love life back and forth seems the understanding of commitment for some fans. Somehow.
Have seen better have seen worse. Medicore. First half was actually cute the 2nd half is a mess. Too long, too much covid.
So I started reading BLOOD ON SNOW and it's... so bad. I'm still debating with myself if I should read on after the male main character finding poorly excuses in one whole chapter why he's a hitman - mainly because he sucks in beating the shit out of women what makes it impossible for him to work as a pimp but he has no regrets in killing them (like this are his only options to make money). I mean uhm... WHAT??? Eventually I missed something here but so far this is my review of the book That explains why Leo dropped out and Tobey jumped in LOL On the other hand I watched the movie based on Jo Nesbos book Midnight Sun called and it wasn't that bad. It's also about a hitman. Does this dude ever write about something else? LOL Also worth to mention
Coming from one of his biggest haters just saying LOL
