Jade Bahr

So the embargo of the secret project Charlie's involved in will be lifted next month. Stay tuned and until then enjoy the view: (we already had this pic but with a different filter)

Not a fan of AI but Leo in the GoT universe looking this devilish delicious? 🐺 Damn where's the moon to howl? 🌚

I think this is peak Leo for me. This look was so hot I swear I would have slept with him in that horse cadaver without a blink LOL I think it's the manly rough look having some very strong effect on my panties primal instinct or something like that Also very much into the baby version of that look

He's probably day dreaming of some vacation lol Leo photobombing to the left Source Is Drew hitting on Leo or Cameron? Or both? 😄 Source

Stunning Her Helen is still one of my biggest female crushes ever. Source Source She is drop dead gorgeous Watched OUT OF THE BLUE. It's much better than the medicore reviews. Also: The 355 is underrated. Source Bonus On my watchlist Source

Haha cute. But he's really good as Mercutio. One of my favorite portrays of the character for sure LOL

Don't know if this cover was ever posted before here. This one for sure but whatever. He looks so damn fine

Oscars — Best Director, For Now, is Martin Scorsese vs Christopher Nolan It’s been a weird year at the movies. There’s a writers and actors strike. ‘Barbenheimer’ is saving the box-office. We’re also still not entirely sure what will break out this fall. Of the major titles being released in the fall, I keep hearing mixed things about “Maestro,” “Ferrari,” “Priscilla” and “The Killer.” Whereas Lanthimos’ “Poor Things” hasn’t test screened yet, but has the luxury of screening at Venice, Telluride and New York. Alexander Payne’s “The Holdovers” has had some strong word of mouth, but what’s with it not being part of NYFF and Venice? Ditto “Saltburn,” another test screening winner that is set to only screen at Telluride, and London a month later. As “Barbenheimer” mania continues, the Best Director race seems to be the most fascinating category. According to the predictions of the “experts” at Gold Derby, the category is, for now, a two-way race between Christopher Nolan(“Oppenheimer”) and Martin Scorsese (“Killers of the Flower Moon“). Nolan has the narrative behind him, he’s never won a directing Oscar, and his work on the biographical drama about the father of the atomic bomb is has been beloved by critics and audiences. Whether it’s the best work of his career, or not, “Oppenheimer” might finally get Nolan that golden statuette. Scorsese premiered “Killers of the Flower Moon” at Cannes, where it was rapturously received, and it’s the work of a filmmaker who can still make great cinema. A tour-de-force of directing, ‘Killers’ is the kind of ambitious story that rarely gets told these days in mainstream moviemaking — “Oppenheimer” being the other exception. Nolan’s “overdue” narrative is reminiscent of the one that Scorsese had when he finally won Best Director for 2006’s “The Departed” — though Scorsese waited much longer for his first trophy than Nolan has had to. Celine Song (“Past Lives”) seems to be a cinch for a directing nomination. She directed the most critically acclaimed movie of the year, so far. Her narrative, from playwright to filmmaker, is contagiously infectious and “Past Lives” has been an indie hit, grossing $10 million domestically. Of course, it’s very early. Another director could swoop in and beat both Nolan and Scorsese. Greta Gerwig (“Barbie”) is probably at #3 or 4 and could easily sneak up on her counterparts. Between now and December, given the current fall slate, I just can’t see many other directors crashing the category the way Scorsese, Nolan and Gerwig have thus far. Maybe Denis Villeneuve can grab a nod for his “Dune” sequel, but a win would be out of the ordinary for a franchise that not everyone has warmed up to, but many respect. Don’t get me wrong, “Dune” has its ardent fanbase, but there are definitely many Academy voters who don’t really care for it.

Cami for Wmag

Not sure if all of this is still Margot related so I put my answer into spoiler and leave this here:

Fair enough Or maybe he is just watching the wrong mainstream movies? There is a whole movie world outside the broken big studio system of Hollywood and I claim if you're open minded and look in the right places you even find decent modern stuff there too.

Maybe all of us should stop judging and/or making assumptions about a womans body we know nothing about it. Alone those comments all over the years caused her a lot of pain and trauma. Mischa Barton: The grim truth about growing up in the public eye Sudden Stardom, Partying and a DUI: Mischa Barton's History of Personal Struggles in Her Own Words Mischa Barton's yo-yo weight battle after cruel comments sparked breakdown

^Is he also complaining about the downfall of the modern male character or is this only a "female" issue in his cinematic world??? And yes I watched the vid.

Epic smile indeed 🤩 Source

Another win for DJATS 👏

I didn't realize (until yesterday) Morgan Freeman was playing the same character here and it's part of a crime book series. But I liked "Kiss the Girls" MUCH better. Also what happened to Monica Potter? I remember her in some movies and then she just disappeared?

Haha no doubts about that. It's nothing wrong with having a powerful man on/at your side 😄

Me too but that's not the Intention or message of the movie at all. If you're looking for a conventional love story you just watched the wrong movie, girl 😄

^It's just something my mom said while we were watching "13 going 30" I will never ever forget. The movie is about to end and 30 years old Jen Garner is sitting on the stairs, crying her eyes out because she didn't get "the man" and then went back to 13 making everything different to make sure she's ending up with "the man". A so called HAPPY ENDING. My mom: So she can't be happy without him, she has to be with him to be happy. Why is this the message of every fuckin girls movie? Also my mom while watching Titanic: Oh so she can live without him! 12 years old sobbing me: But with him would be so much nicer. My mom: You will understand when you're older. Me today: My mom was right.

Never been a mud girl but damn he can make me dirty all day 😻

@Lilja K this set deserves to be here in all his glory for you know history and science and stuff 🥵 It's Aaron Taylor-Johnson Season!

Why is always everyone assuming the heroine needs a hero to be fully filled?

Speaking of TITANIC Ruimy at least states the movie belongs to his nine top-tier movies in terms of quality of the billion dollar club (just beaten by "The Dark Knight"). Critic Richard Brody on the other hand thinks Barbie is the best and Titanic sucks calling it "an unoriginal dinosaur" 😄 Yeah well otherwise than the dinosaurs Titanic is still very much alive belong many fans LOL Let's see if BARBIE will have the same impact in 25 years. Richard Brody: ‘Barbie’ is the Best Movie to Ever Cross the Billion-Dollar Mark The New Yorker’s Richard Brody is a top-notch film writer, but his tastes can veer towards total and utter bewilderment. Yesterday, I wrote about how he believed that the Spike Lee remake of “Oldboy” was better than the original. He also abides by the church of mumblecore. He believes it’s this generation’s nouvelle vague. Let us not forget to mention his unadorned infatuation for Eddie Murphy’s “Norbit.” Brody’s latest hot take is not his worst, but it’s far from being one of his best. He’s a big fan of Greta Gerwig’s “Barbie” and believes it is the best movie to have ever crossed the billion dollar worldwide mark at the box-office: “Whatever the virtues of Titanic (very minor, in my view), it's an artistic dinosaur, completely unoriginal and backwards-looking in form and style. Impressive technique, trivial artistry […] The point is that Barbie is the *best* movie to cross the billion-dollar line.” “Barbie” was the 53rd movie in history to hit the billion dollar mark (not counting inflation). Only one other 2023 title has made more money than Gerwig’s film and that’s “Super Mario Bros.” For a film to make over $1 billion at the box-office it has to adhere to mainstream tastes and not be too creative risk-taking — you don’t want to isolate the viewed, but, rather, coddle then with familiarity. The fact that Gerwig’s “Barbie” has made this much money is some kind of miracle as it doesn’t necessarily play it safe. It is, however, very invested in its own identity as mass-marketed product placement. It’s a mix of art and blatant consumerism. One look at the list of 53 movies that made $1 billion and you instantly understand why Brody would think “Barbie” is the best one of the lot. I’ve counted only nine top-tier movies, in terms of quality, to have achieved this box-office feat: “The Dark Knight,” “Titanic,” “Toy Story 3,” “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King,” “Joker,” “Skyfall,” “Jurassic Park,” “Avengers: Endgame,” and “Zootopia”