Stamoholic

10!!!!!!!!!!!!! I hate to be a person who posts pics in the middle of a thread but... LOOK at those hips! Come on! There's a reason Christie is an ICON of American beauty and swimsuit modelling... and it's an obvious reason! I simply refuse to believe that any full grown, self respecting man would rather have a good ole roll around with the prepubescent looking Miranda Kerr or Esti, than throw down with Christie god damn Brinkley!! And would any women really rather have a stretched out " child with boobs" body than sensual, toned, curves? Am I alone here??? Maybe it's just because this is a fashion forum... Personally, if I had Esti or Miranda's bod I would feel gangly and boyish. If I had Christie's, I would be showing off in daisy-dukes for the rest of my life

6. Her body is nice but the only thing that impresses me are the hips. The glam girls are actually more attractive me to me, but not in the butt department. I've noticed Brit glam models never have butts

I don't have time to repost it here, but there is a new Christie editorial at this link: http://hellisfashionscans.blogspot.com/

^ I totally understand why you brought the similarity to everyones attention. It does appear confusing I also think that probably 99% of the people who vote in this comp gave higher scores more readily at the start.

Personally Joe, Petra scores higher with me because in a couple of pictures I've seen of her she has a cute butt ( Not in all, but in some) and booty is important to me Miranda is almost on the negative scale for booty, so that's a put off. I agree they're similar. Neither is perfect to me.

New from Blackmen magazine, I believe:

I Jesikah!: /monthly_11_2009/post-26767-0-1593848215-82636_thumb.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="20080608-jesmax6.jpg"> /monthly_11_2009/post-26767-0-1593848215-89317_thumb.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="20080608-jesmax9.jpg"> /monthly_11_2009/post-26767-0-1593848216-01339_thumb.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Jesikah_Maximus_18.jpg"> /monthly_11_2009/post-26767-0-1593848216-10072_thumb.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="vixens677-jesikah-maximus.jpg"> /monthly_11_2009/post-26767-0-1593848216-14626_thumb.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="vixens682-jesikah-maximus.jpg">

Here's some more booty for you boys :

In the day she was a 9.8, so for this comp she's a 9.8. Her breasts weren't " big" like a lot of people think, but just in amazing proportion to her body. Her hip-to-waist ratio is yummy, and her butts not perfect but definitely not bad. She's a 9.8! Also, I'll never totally get Miranda's appeal in terms of her stretched out 11 year old body with boobs ( and no butt, ick!), but I think she seems like a really sweet person and her face is pretty, so I do like her

Gene BB Elizabeth Marilyn Vivien Rita Ursula Sharon

Miranda = 6. She's never done much for me. In pictures her body looks okay, but I can imagine in person she would look like a beautiful gangly alien That's not so hot, to my way of thinking! P.S: Joe, you've got your own mind, and that's why you're so awesome. xxxxxxxxx

Great post, Joe I don't 100% agree on everything, but I basically do. I don't presume any body part is " superior" just because it's fashionable, and, at the end of the day, even if we find someone to look good on screen, that doesn't mean they're the type we go for in real life. I can find a blonde actor gorgeous, but I wouldn't usually find myself attracted to a blonde guy. One of my male friends loves skinny models, but he wouldn't give them one look at if they were in a club with him. Reality and fantasy are different things. The media praises Beyonce's body and Lohan's. So, should we consider both above average? No, I wouldn't. Beyonce's? Hell yes! Lindsay's? Not at all. Fashion and media pressure has a grand effect on what many people perceive to be " beauty", whether we wanna admit it or not. In the 1920s, women with big tits wouldn't be considered great bodies because it wasn't fashionable. In the 1970s-80s, America developed an obssession with huge breasts. Does that mean men didn't find big boobs and curves gorgeous in the 20s? I doubt it! Did no flat-chested women get a look at during the 70s? No way! It's just what fashion and the media make us think is " gorgeous". It's seperate from reality in most cases. Personally, I find it really disturbing, in our current decade, to hear about the amount of VS and other commercial models who have been under the knife. An industry that is supposed to promote beauty is actually promoting monstrification and the regementation of human beauty So sick. But trends ebb and flow That's how I keep my chin up when I look at botoxified 20 year olds

Gene Elizabeth Marilyn ... Audrey, because I loved her so much when I was a little girl ( Sorry BB... AGAIN! :() Vivien ( Weird, I know, because I've been voting for Ursula but... I've taken a new shine to V lately) Kim Sharon Rita ( I adore Lauren, but Rita was such a babe )

EDIT: 7.5 I had a closer look, and I think it was her gorgeous face that made me originally put '8'. Her body is hot, but not 100% perfect to me.

Rita Marilyn Gene Elizabeth Lauren ( Baah, I feel I'm being so mean to BB ) Grace Ursula Sharon

She gets a 7.9 because of those awesome hips. The rest is too lanky and flat for my taste Gorgeous girl though.

8.9. She's got something really nice... she doesn't authomatically jump out at me though. It's only on closer inspection she looks great! But then, you know, she looks great

Marilyn ( That was very hard! I love Claudia!) Ursula Greta Yvonne Rita Mylene Gene ( Hard, again!) Ava

Ingrid Bergman Vivien Leigh Brigitte Bardot Pier Angeli Audrey Hepburn Lana Turner Sharon Tate Lauren Bacall

Ingrid Bergman ( I actually prefer Anna's beauty, but...) Romy Schneider Grace Kelly Tough one... Pier Angeli * Hides from Lisa-1* I love BB too, but as far as I know BB was never with Jimmy Dean, and the Dean factor gives Pier big coolness points in my books Lana Turner Again, tough... as an actress I prefer Audrey... but as a beauty it's Sophia... but I'm going with Audrey Hepburn because she's more " classic" to me. Lauren Bacall ( I think she invented the word " smoulder") Sharon Tate Claudia Cardinale ( Okay, so Ursula also had a thing with Dean, but I'm just going to forget that so I can vote for CC! ) Marilyn Monroe :heart: Greta Garbo Yvonne De Carlo Jacqueline Bisset Rita Hayworth Gene Tierney!!!!!! Elizabeth Taylor ( You must know how tough this was for me... both had romantic\close relationships with Dean!! My whole voting system just exploded in my face )

6. Her stomach freaks me out. It always looks 2D and I don't find it sexy. Flat and toned is perfect... but Ale is a little much! Nice hips though!

I hate to be someone who posts a pic in the middle of a thread but... HOLY HOLY HOTNESS: Who wouldn't want that torso??!! Vanessa is defo getting mixed reviews here, but I think any woman or man would be kidding themselves if they said they wouldn't want those tits, stomach and legs!

9.5. Slim but curvy with a nice butt. Toned stomach without it being too flat and abnormal looking. P.E.R.F.E.C.T thighs! I'm a fan now

I only just discovered her! I'll post some pics later