donbot

Neon Brasil fittings addicted88 @ tfs

Wow, I thought Ale had been nominated already. I'll take her too I'll get pics to you later

Cindy x 3

17. Natalie Martinez 18. Rosamund Pike 19. Eva Mendes 20. Emilie De Ravin 21. Freida Pinto 22. Julia Roberts 23. Emma Stone 24. Ziyi Zhang

Alexa Scarlett Leighton Rose Violet

3.5

Ana Beatriz Barros Julia Stegner Andi Muise Anne Vyalitsina Karolina Kurkova (you can add under MissLimaVzla's name, since she named KK earlier)

Looks like my Marloes, but I don't recognise that picture

^Yep

^Love it!

Actually, haha I just realised that was the wrong model. I've got those two confused before

Aye, I did my best. Everyone will see things differently no matter what anyway I suppose it's also hard when you're the one choosing the pics, to see them objectively, outside the context and familiarity of model's overall work BTW, some slightly less sea-monster (?? ) butt shots of the current girly: edit

So pretty in this campaign

Being the one who chose her pictures, and also one who's more familiar with her work than you are, I can say that those are a pretty good representation of her body. She's got a particularly distinctive torso, with her stomach being quite flat and hard but with not much muscle definition. Her bellybutton is where it is.. freakishly high or not I really don't know how you managed to see such a big difference in her boob size in the 3 pictures if you understand how the garments and gravity works. They look consistent to me, and again pretty representative of what she's packing. There are a lot of her pictures with notably more cleavage, but that's false advertising. Can't say I agree with you on the leg or butt shots, but hey that's me. Seems everyone's photo choices suck for one reason or another

^Yeah, the industry has obviously completely changed to how it was, and how it sits within society. It's also worth pointing out though, that that humanity hasn't gotten any better or worse looking as a whole, over 70 years. It's completely to do with the paradigms of beauty of the time, including style and fashion and everything that goes with it. People were just as obsessed with beauty and glamour back then as they are now (arguable moreso in the context of film). I guarantee if they had access to the tools they have now, back then, they'd use it in a heartbeat. It's nothing to do with actresses or models 'needing' it. It's also interesting NYBella when you mentioned 'natural beauty', when I find that old Hollywood look anything but. I mean there was so much emphasis put on that 'movie star' aesthetic, with all the makeup and hair styling and what not. It seems to be back then that there was even more of a chasm between the famous and the 'ordinary people', purely in terms of how they were presented and how they were viewed.

I'll go Izabel Goulart and Maryna Linchuk

Shay Yasmine Emanuela Ana Tori

^Yeah, that's her They always brush out the tattoo in her shoots

^Edita would never be terrible anywhere Maybe her looks come across more on film. In all the pictures I've seen of her though, she's overwhelmingly plain :|

Nice collection of pics, thanks for sharing

Lips: 6 Smile: 9 Hair: 5 Eyes: 8 Nose: 7 Abs: 6 Cleavage: 5 Butt: 9 Legs: 9.5

Vivien beat Edita.. just wow. To each their own I guess Petra Ale Rosario Josie Camilla

^Awesome campaign, thanks!

Not crazy about either.. 1.5 each

Adriana Lima Edita Vilkeviciuete Samanmtha Ahrens Marloes Horst Olga Kurylenko Team Edita needs you more