Jump to content

phenobarbie

Admin
  • Joined

Everything posted by phenobarbie

  1. Isabeli Fontana: 128 Natasha Poly: 150 Coco Rocha: 100 Raquel Zimmermann: 98 Anja Rubik: 146 Catherine McNeil: 13 Caroline Trentini: 125 Gisele Bundchen: 126 Magdalena Frackowiak: 35 Natalia Vodianova: 28
  2. Selita x3 easily
  3. 1. Hair:9 2. Butt:10 3. Face:9 4. Eyes:10 5. Legs:9 6. Body:9.4 7. Smile:10 8. Cleavage:10! 9. Sexiness:10 10. Natural Beauty:10 Voter #: 15
  4. Salma x2
  5. umm... o.0 4
  6. Isabeli Fontana: 120 Natasha Poly: 145 Coco Rocha: 98 Raquel Zimmermann: 96 Anja Rubik: 146 Catherine McNeil: 11 Caroline Trentini: 125 Gisele Bundchen: 130 Magdalena Frackowiak: 42 Natalia Vodianova: 32
  7. isabeli x2 izabel x1
  8. Kate Moss Perfume x3 o.0
  9. 1. Hair: 3 2. Butt: 2.5 3. Face: 2 4. Eyes: 2 5. Legs: 4 6. Body: 2.5 7. Smile: 2.5 8. Cleavage: 2 9. Sexiness: 1 10. Natural Beauty: 3 Voter #: 12
  10. Breasts, lips, eyebrows etc can all be accounted for with make-up, age and as Morgan pointed out built in/push up bras. Now I'm not saying she hasn't had plastic surgery, but I've seen some drastic star changes in actresses and actors... and not all of them are due to plastic surgery. Regardless... good thread, it's nice to see someone elses imperfections, if only because it makes you feel more secure about your own imperfections. As for the 9/9/07 picture, it's blurry and has a brighter/harsher light whereas the other has a more natural light. The introduction to a lightsource that is no longer natural always distorts a picture, it's why so many young girls like taking over exposed pictures, (it hides their flaws) or so they think.
  11. Overall Natalia
  12. Isabeli Fontana: 126 Natasha Poly: 138 Coco Rocha: 98 Raquel Zimmermann: 100 Anja Rubik: 146 Catherine McNeil: 23 Caroline Trentini: 132 Gisele Bundchen: 138 Magdalena Frackowiak: 42 Natalia Vodianova: 32
  13. Anja overall
  14. Isabeli Fontana: 132 Natasha Poly: 137 Coco Rocha: 98 Raquel Zimmermann: 100 Anja Rubik: 142 Catherine McNeil: 23 Caroline Trentini: 130 Gisele Bundchen: 145 Magdalena Frackowiak: 42 Natalia Vodianova: 40
  15. Famke x2
  16. Marisa x3
  17. 1. Hair: 8.5 2. Butt: 9 3. Face: 9 4. Eyes: 8 5. Legs: 7.5 6. Body: 7 7. Smile: 4 8. Cleavage: 5.5 9. Sexiness: 9.5 10. Natural Beauty: 7.5 Voter #: 1
  18. 1. Hair: 6 2. Butt: 5.5 3. Face: 4.5 4. Eyes: 5 5. Legs: 5.5 6. Body: 4 7. Smile: 6 8. Cleavage: 5.5 9. Sexiness: 4 10. Natural Beauty: 3 Voter #: 18
  19. lol Baron, that's the spirit Baron!
  20. 1. Hair: 7 2. Butt: 4 3. Face: 6.5 4. Eyes: 7 5. Legs: 7 6. Body: 6.5 7. Smile: 7.5 8. Cleavage: 4 9. Sexiness: 1 10. Natural Beauty: 7 Voter #: 14 I've seen Rich Girls and while it's somewhat sexy... this video says it all, and this is her doing what she naturally does o.0 I don't know it kinda ruins the perception of sexiness when she acts like this. It's just not my thing.
  21. Isabeli Fontana: 132 Natasha Poly: 139 Coco Rocha: 82 Raquel Zimmermann: 100 Anja Rubik: 146 Catherine McNeil: 43 Caroline Trentini: 124 Gisele Bundchen: 145 Magdalena Frackowiak: 50 Natalia Vodianova: 40
  22. I still find them incredibly boring. They can be made by whomever, however they are utterly boring, and some completely frightening. These type of commercials for the most part do not appeal to people in north america they are made for europeans, whome they do appeal to. *shrugs* just my opinion.
  23. I've come to the conclusion that for the most part.. I find european commercials very boring o.0 martini x3
  24. 1. Hair: 6 2. Butt: 4.5 3. Face: 5 4. Eyes: 6 5. Legs: 6 6. Body: 5 7. Smile: 7 8. Cleavage: 6.5 9. Sexiness: 3 10. Natural Beauty: 4 Voter #: 6