Jump to content

phenobarbie

Admin
  • Joined

Everything posted by phenobarbie

  1. Isabeli Fontana: 119 Natasha Poly: 140 Coco Rocha: 101 Raquel Zimmermann: 102 Anja Rubik: 142 Caroline Trentini: 131 Gisele Bundchen: 123 Magdalena Frackowiak Natalia Vodianova: 30
  2. Courtney
  3. Something about Adriana's legs bother me.. seriously the definition in her upper thigh just looks off, whereas Ana's look shapeless. Also, I know this from personal experience, ((one of my friends is severely bulimic and anorexic to the point of having to go through numerous treatments and psychological councelling), and no I'm not saying this is a fact), however the way the legs on Adriana are defined it almost looks like she has been doing some serious purging. Not only is there a rippled effect, (which could I suppose be from excessive weight training) but there are dips and hollows where there shouldn't be if the muscle was being clearly defined. Of course there is the chance that Adriana just lost a large amount of weight by working out and eating healthy, but even when her body looked the best it ever has, (which was several years ago) she has always had a very full face, and this year there were hollows in her cheeks and she looked rather gaunt. Just my two cents, you're welcome to disagree or agree, however I feel that in light of my opinion I have to vote for ana... Ana x3
  4. 1. Hair: 8 2. Butt: 9.2 3. Face: 8.3 4. Eyes: 9.1 5. Legs: 9.7 6. Body: 9.8 7. Smile: 7.2 8. Cleavage: 8.4 9. Sexiness: 9.9 10. Natural Beauty: 8.5 Voter #: 13
  5. Isabeli Fontana: 112 Natasha Poly: 140 Coco Rocha: 101 Raquel Zimmermann: 102 Anja Rubik: 148 Caroline Trentini: 131 Gisele Bundchen: 123 Magdalena Frackowiak: 22 Natalia Vodianova: 30
  6. 1. Hair: 8 2. Butt: 6 3. Face: 7.5 4. Eyes: 8.5 5. Legs: 9 6. Body: 8.5 7. Smile: 7.5 8. Cleavage: 3 - it comes and goes :| 9. Sexiness: 7.8 10. Natural Beauty: 7.7 Voter #: 15
  7. Isabeli Fontana: 122 Natasha Poly: 132 Coco Rocha: 109 Raquel Zimmermann: 102 Anja Rubik: 150 Caroline Trentini: 129 Gisele Bundchen: 120 Magdalena Frackowiak: 17 Natalia Vodianova: 30
  8. Izabel x3
  9. 1. Hair: 8.5 2. Butt: 9 3. Face: 8.7 4. Eyes: 9 5. Legs: 7.5 6. Body: 6 7. Smile: 9 8. Cleavage: 3 - where did it go? 9. Sexiness: 9 10. Natural Beauty: 8 Voter #: 2
  10. wow... not impressed o.0 4
  11. Courtney
  12. Isabeli Fontana: 120 Natasha Poly: 132 Coco Rocha: 109 Raquel Zimmermann: 102 Anja Rubik: 144 Caroline Trentini: 129 Gisele Bundchen: 120 Magdalena Frackowiak: 17 Natalia Vodianova: 34
  13. 1. Hair: 5 2. Butt: 1 o.0 it's flat.. like.. well flat kinda board like 3. Face: 5 4. Eyes: 4 5. Legs: 2 - 6. Body: 3 7. Smile: 2 8. Cleavage: 2 9. Sexiness: 1 - seriously.. never looked at her much, but WTF is up with her arms?! 10. Natural Beauty: 4 Voter #: 17
  14. Guerlain x3
  15. 1. Hair: 8 2. Butt: 8.3 3. Face: 8.5 4. Eyes: 9 5. Legs: 7.9 6. Body: 9.3 7. Smile: 7.6 8. Cleavage: 9.2 9. Sexiness: 10 10. Natural Beauty: 10 Voter #: 11
  16. Isabeli Fontana: 124 Natasha Poly: 150 Coco Rocha: 105 Raquel Zimmermann: 98 Anja Rubik: 146 Caroline Trentini: 126 Gisele Bundchen: 129 Magdalena Frackowiak: 33 Natalia Vodianova: 34
  17. Normally I would say Ana.. length is after all a godsend... BUT there's no definition at all. They're like walking twigs o.0 Alessandra x3
  18. 1. Hair: 8 2. Butt: 4 3. Face: 6 4. Eyes: 7 5. Legs: 6.5 6. Body: 8.5 7. Smile: 5.5 8. Cleavage: 4 9. Sexiness: 8 10. Natural Beauty: 7 Voter #: 5
  19. Isabeli Fontana: 125 Natasha Poly: 147 Coco Rocha: 100 Raquel Zimmermann: 95 Anja Rubik: 146 Catherine McNeil: 11 Caroline Trentini: 128 Gisele Bundchen: 121 Magdalena Frackowiak: 32 Natalia Vodianova: 32
  20. Isabeli Fontana: 123 Natasha Poly: 150 Coco Rocha: 100 Raquel Zimmermann: 100 Anja Rubik: 146 Catherine McNeil: 12 Caroline Trentini: 128 Gisele Bundchen: 121 Magdalena Frackowiak: 35 Natalia Vodianova: 28
  21. 1. Hair: 7 2. Butt: 7.5 3. Face: 8 4. Eyes: 9 5. Legs: 7 6. Body: 7.5 7. Smile: 8 8. Cleavage: 7 9. Sexiness: 8.5 10. Natural Beauty: 8 Voter #: 5
  22. congrats if you got it.. I couldn't even get the program to work