Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

Sarah.Adams

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sarah.Adams

  1. Sarah.Adams replied to Enrico_sw's post in a topic in General Talk
  2. for being mistaken
  3. 1 3 6 8
  4. Sarah.Adams replied to Enrico_sw's post in a topic in General Talk
  5. Sarah.Adams replied to a post in a topic in Music
  6. Sarah.Adams replied to Enrico_sw's post in a topic in General Talk
  7. Sarah.Adams replied to Joe > Average's post in a topic in General Talk
  8. Sarah.Adams replied to Enrico_sw's post in a topic in General Talk
  9. Sarah.Adams replied to Enrico_sw's post in a topic in General Talk
  10. Sarah.Adams replied to Enrico_sw's post in a topic in General Talk
  11. 1 4 6 7
  12. Don't listen to this guy. You don't have to fix yourself. It's not your fault ........ it's @Stormbringer 's fault
  13. Sarah.Adams replied to a post in a topic in Music
  14. I'm trying to say that I don't feel like a racist studying and talk in public about racial differences in academic performance ......... I actually consider it a very interesting topic.
  15. That's not correct. IQ and SAT (and the likes ) are not similar tests. SAT measures readiness in trained skills while IQ measures cognitive abilities (that largely can't be trained). Furthermore putting IQ and SAT tests in the same category is not exactly innocent from your part ...... it's because there's plenty of proof SAT tends to discriminate while isn't any for IQ you want those 2 in the same basket. If you convince your audience those 2 are practically the same then IQ tests also tend to discriminate. But in fact those 2 are irrelevant ...... ignoratio elenchi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrelevant_conclusion That's correct ........ but then again it means nothing. It's the best tool we've developed to approach cognition in a measurable manner
  16. Sarah.Adams replied to Lyla's post in a topic in General Talk
    shut up and stretch .... you lazy fuck
  17. 2 3 5 8
  18. Actually IQ is clearly defined and accurately measured ..... same as the 100 m dash for example. There isn't any proof IQ tests are engineered to favor a specific racial group (feel free to present proof and prove me wrong)
  19. why is it fully OK to talk about racial differences in athletic performance ...... while if you talk about racial differences in IQ or academic performance you are automatically condemned as racist?
  20. Sarah.Adams replied to frenchkiki's post in a topic in General Talk
    Just because how come @Stormbringer is such a filthy traitor?
  21. Sarah.Adams replied to Enrico_sw's post in a topic in General Talk
  22. of course it's not her fault ....it's @Stormbringer's fault