Qball Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauline Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 I think it depends on person... Julianne looks lovely pale, and at the same time I cannot imagine Zeta-Jones pale.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 same.. well, I think I could imagine her pale.. I've seen her light looking, just not as white as say Nicole Kidman. Usually, I prefer tanned but not to an extreme...no orange please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amber69 Posted May 29, 2006 Share Posted May 29, 2006 I voted tanned because a tan can hide imperfections and make most people look good but on the other hand there are people like Liv Tyler who look good partly because of their pale skin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauline Posted May 29, 2006 Share Posted May 29, 2006 ow it's 50/50I just think that having perfect pale skin is a gift - any skin can look better when tanned, but pale is sth very rare when perfectfor example Nicole (as you said Rogue), Julianne, Dita Von Teese, Sophie Ellis Bextor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted May 31, 2006 Share Posted May 31, 2006 yeah, totally depends. some women (Scarlett!) look terrible tanned. and in MTL, most of the beautiful women are pale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauline Posted May 31, 2006 Share Posted May 31, 2006 yeah, totally depends. some women (Scarlett!) look terrible tanned. and in MTL, most of the beautiful women are pale so, it's 50/50 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted May 31, 2006 Share Posted May 31, 2006 yes. but don't think that means you should tan 50% of yourself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauline Posted May 31, 2006 Share Posted May 31, 2006 yes. but don't think that means you should tan 50% of yourself NOT? :shock: darn. Now what, looking like jing-jang <_< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanja Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 Taned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maybelline Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 tanned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauline Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 what about something in between? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 if we're going to be picky, what about our African models that don't show a tan, and are never pale? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauline Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 what about just "natural"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 it's just about how much time you spend in the sun. you and the last few hundred generations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OriginalSin Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 Natural!! Where's that option?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 natural is so 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinky Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 I'll go with natural Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 hm, Pauline, OS and tinky... I guess I will go with "Natural" in that case! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.