schadenfreude Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 Yup, a nuclear war would be the best thing for the world right now.Can you think of a better way slow down resource depletion, knock the population down to a managable number, and stop the industriliazed world from turning good people into fat, lazy, stupid, sorry excuses for human beings?And a website that supports world depopulation is: http://churchofeuthanasia.org/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOCHO Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 A nuclear war would mean the end of the homo-sapiens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avenger Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 Would that be a bad thing?For us?For the Earth?For the Universe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOCHO Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 Bad for us, good for planet Earth (which would eventually recover.. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 A nuclear war would mean the end of the homo-sapiens. no it wouldn't . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expresso Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 well, if it doesn't kill us, I think we'd look very different when it's over. Y'know, the extra crispy fried chicken look Then again, in some people's cases, that would be a step forward :evil: Now I wonder: their motto is "kill yourself, save the planet." Now how come this site is still updated? Shouldn't they be dead already? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 well, if it doesn't kill us, I think we'd look very different when it's over. Y'know, the extra crispy fried chicken look Then again, in some people's cases, that would be a step forward :evil: Now I wonder: their motto is "kill yourself, save the planet." Now how come this site is still updated? Shouldn't they be dead already? no country in a nuclear war would nuke the whole surface of the planet . . . . people will always survive a 'nuclear holocaust'. studies on Hiroshima and places show that the nukes caused very few mutations and so are quite easily survivable and would allow one to produce viable progeny in the forseeable future . . . some countries would probably have the bulk of their nuclear arsenals targetted within the first few hours and destroyed. as i have said before, nukes can only be used strategically. and if i do get nuked and i ain't in the 2 mile blast zone or whatever then i got my iodine tablets ready personally i'm not too concerned . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red_ed Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 damn medical students! spoiling the fun for everyone...*starts imagining life as a bunny crossed with a monkey...with wings!* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOCHO Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 well, if it doesn't kill us, I think we'd look very different when it's over. Y'know, the extra crispy fried chicken look Then again, in some people's cases, that would be a step forward :evil: Now I wonder: their motto is "kill yourself, save the planet." Now how come this site is still updated? Shouldn't they be dead already? no country in a nuclear war would nuke the whole surface of the planet . . . . people will always survive a 'nuclear holocaust'. studies on Hiroshima and places show that the nukes caused very few mutations and so are quite easily survivable and would allow one to produce viable progeny in the forseeable future . . . some countries would probably have the bulk of their nuclear arsenals targetted within the first few hours and destroyed. as i have said before, nukes can only be used strategically. and if i do get nuked and i ain't in the 2 mile blast zone or whatever then i got my iodine tablets ready personally i'm not too concerned . . . You are right .. we can recover form A-Bombs, but the bombs we've got now are thousands of times more powerful. Recent studies show that if we use only 7, our atmosphere would be irreversibly damaged. A WMD war would mean exctincion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red_ed Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 excellent news GOCHO... grow my pretty little wings... :evil: *stares at back* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schadenfreude Posted November 24, 2005 Author Share Posted November 24, 2005 (edited) You are right .. we can recover form A-Bombs, but the bombs we've got now are thousands of times more powerful. Recent studies show that if we use only 7, our atmosphere would be irreversibly damaged.A WMD war would mean exctincion.You are the stupidest person I have ever known, seriously.If a nuclear war breaks out, we just have to usher a guy and his family members into an ark, and 150 days later, he and his family will emerge unscathed to repopulate the earth. Edited November 24, 2005 by Heidegger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red_ed Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 Don't forget the 2 animals thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOCHO Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 You are right .. we can recover form A-Bombs, but the bombs we've got now are thousands of times more powerful. Recent studies show that if we use only 7, our atmosphere would be irreversibly damaged. A WMD war would mean exctincion. You are the stupidest person I have ever known, seriously. If a nuclear war breaks out, we just have to usher a guy and his family members into an ark, and 150 days later, he and his family will emerge unscathed to repopulate the earth. When I was reading the first sentence I was starting to think about how to respond to that.. and then I read the rest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 well, if it doesn't kill us, I think we'd look very different when it's over. Y'know, the extra crispy fried chicken look Then again, in some people's cases, that would be a step forward :evil: Now I wonder: their motto is "kill yourself, save the planet." Now how come this site is still updated? Shouldn't they be dead already? no country in a nuclear war would nuke the whole surface of the planet . . . . people will always survive a 'nuclear holocaust'. studies on Hiroshima and places show that the nukes caused very few mutations and so are quite easily survivable and would allow one to produce viable progeny in the forseeable future . . . some countries would probably have the bulk of their nuclear arsenals targetted within the first few hours and destroyed. as i have said before, nukes can only be used strategically. and if i do get nuked and i ain't in the 2 mile blast zone or whatever then i got my iodine tablets ready personally i'm not too concerned . . . You are right .. we can recover form A-Bombs, but the bombs we've got now are thousands of times more powerful. Recent studies show that if we use only 7, our atmosphere would be irreversibly damaged. A WMD war would mean exctincion. i don't believe that one bit. (no offence or anything ) i think that that's scare-mongering talk. you just take iodine pills so that your thyroid isn't screwed over and you're cool . . . . i really am not concerned one bit. nukes are real overrated . . . . real overrated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keshuvaL Posted November 24, 2005 Share Posted November 24, 2005 Lets start with North America, China and India Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.