June 15, 200520 yr Last one... it's kinda, um, sleazy. Even for Maxim. Seriously, the shirt-hiked-up-to-armpits look does nobody favors. And she looks like she got, like, something kinda weird done to her breasts in this pic. She is defying gravity LIKE WHOA there! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If it were UK Maxim, she could have been topless (not that she would have been). She had to have voted for Bush in 2004. She would have only been 17 in 2000.
June 15, 200520 yr If it were UK Maxim, she could have been topless (not that she would have been).She had to have voted for Bush in 2004. She would have only been 17 in 2000.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yeah she was 17, but that is who she favoured. There was an interview where she answered the question.
June 15, 200520 yr Just a hint to those who aren't good at doing two-page scans:Post each half, unedited. It may look like crap, but so does half-assedly attaching them together with a blurry track down the middle (no offense, I used to do those too). If you post them seperate there are plenty of people here (myself included) who can attach them and repost it.
June 17, 200520 yr Just a hint to those who aren't good at doing two-page scans:Post each half, unedited.
June 17, 200520 yr Oh, and a few new candids. Damn watermarks... <_< Her boyfriend is spectacularly simian.
June 17, 200520 yr Thank you very much for the Maxim phots, funnyfan!!! I love them About Kim and Maxim, VH1 will offer the maxim hot 100
June 17, 200520 yr her video is on msn.comCan someone upload it? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks, man. I saw them, and they are amazing . She is really sexy there.
June 17, 200520 yr her video is on msn.comCan someone upload it? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i'm workin on it i have only 12kb up, so it'll take a while...
June 17, 200520 yr maxim video 1http://rapidshare.de/files/2447125/KimSmit...t1_msn.wmv.htmlmaxim video 2http://rapidshare.de/files/2447434/KimSmit...t2_msn.wmv.html
June 17, 200520 yr Wow, thanks Adalgo. Kim looks pretty through most of the shoot. I'm still pissed off that Maxim went and chose the worst pics of it to publish, while leaving nicer pics behind. The pic below is so sexy... why didn't they publish it?!
June 17, 200520 yr Because, to their logic, best pics are saved for subscribers. hense why the best ones are in the members' section
June 17, 200520 yr Wow, thanks Adalgo. Kim looks pretty through most of the shoot. I'm still pissed off that Maxim went and chose the worst pics of it to publish, while leaving nicer pics behind. The pic below is so sexy... why didn't they publish it?! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> that is so sexy
June 17, 200520 yr Because, to their logic, best pics are saved for subscribers. hense why the best ones are in the members' section<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Hmmm... I can sorta understand that, but they're still dumb. Wouldn't the subscribers like to get BIG PRINTED versions of the best pics on the website? And wouldn't people who DON'T subscribe buy the magazine more often if it was loaded with better pics?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.