SchtoopingHer Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Once again I'd like to say that I thinkn its her. I obviously dont know anything about the picture, as in where its from, and neither do I know why she wouldnt tkae pictures like that.That being said, from the first time i saw the thumbnail, until now, when i have examined the picture up close, I still think its her.Her body looks just like her, and she did have her hair blondish for a while, and as someone said, it could easily be hair extensions.The figure, from afar and up close, looks just like her to me. Quote
SchtoopingHer Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Legs are similiar to Adri's but...I don't think it's her, cause she never takes these shots and I think she has better booty than that. Still, I think Neo should decide� <_<<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why doesnt she take shots like these, and does she really have a say in it? Also, I think the booty looks damn fine, much better than some of the recent shots i have seen of it. One in particular from the new vs catalog, where she is wearing a tiger striped one piece swimsuit . . . in that her butt looked alot less appealing than it does to me here.P.S. sorry about the double post.EDIT: Here are a couple of pics that show what im talking about:http://www2.victoriassecret.com/images/prodlgvw/V246708.jpg --the pic i mentioned abovehttp://www2.victoriassecret.com/images/prodlgvw/V247108.jpg --same suit from the front (the suit has mysteriously disappeared from their websites choices)And i don't understand why she would be comfortable doing either of these pics, but not doing the one in question.http://www2.victoriassecret.com/images/prodlgvw/V247015.jpghttp://www2.victoriassecret.com/images/prodlgvw/V246767.jpg --seems alot more visually graphic than the one in questionJust my opinion.PPS. Also, shes done VS shoots with panties that are literally flossing her butt cheeks, and those pics and clothes are more graphic than the one in question.Please do not hotlink images - edited by persuazn Quote
Iris Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Thanks, but I definitely don't consider myself to be any sort of Adriana expert. This is just my humble opinion.It's not just the issue that the model in the photo is in a graphic pose.It's that that is not a Victoria's Secret picture. Victoria's Secret photography is relatively consistent (you can't help but notice if you're as big a VS shopper as I am), especially since they pretty much use Russell James for all the lingerie photography. They always have the models faces featured in the shot; even in back views they have the model turning around or at least her profile is visible enough to recognize who it is. The only times the face is not visible is if they're showing different panty styles, and then they just show the panty, like belly to mid-thigh and not the whole body like it is being shown in that picture. I have the catalogs from 1999-present and I've never seen that picture or any lingerie like it featured. Quote
Eltorro Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 I think that this is not Adriana She was talking about that brazilian girls and their backs The shape of back is different Quote
Neo52285 Posted May 11, 2005 Author Posted May 11, 2005 well personally if you are saying its from editorial there would be more then 1 picture and if you are saying its vs, like iris has mentioned there is always a glimpse of the face...i dont think that is adriana in the picture personally....to say the least im not an expert but i dont think it is adriana Quote
red_ed Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 I think that this is not Adriana She was talking about that brazilian girls and their backs The shape of back is different <{POST_SNAPBACK}> that's a good point eltorro, the picture in question features a small, "tight" ass (for the lack of a better word <_<) but adri's isn't "tight" . In one of her videos (can't remember which one) she talks about brasilian booty as being great because its so big and fleshy... just my 2 cents Quote
zoltar Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 that's not adrianasorry-but that butt is way better than adrianasin that picture at least Quote
inlivingcolor Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 sweet-lady, were those pictures from your signature posted before? Quote
SchtoopingHer Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 I think that this is not Adriana She was talking about that brazilian girls and their backs The shape of back is different <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I still think it could be her. If you know anything about photography, then you can immediately tell that the perspective these photos are taken from could do make a great deal of difference. In this case, the photo in question is taken from about mid thigh level, and in addition, she is leaning forward slightly. The runway photo is taken from far away, at a raised level. It is also taken from much further away flattening the image and making perspective less of an issue. The two perspectives are seperated by about 40 degrees. If I am right, the difference in body proportions would be visible in the legs, which would be longer in the questioned photo, and shorter in the runway one (which is true). Also, the torso of the quesitoned photo would visibly be smaller than the one in the runway photo, which is also true. (e.g. If in the questioned pic, the women would stand up straight, she would be taller, and her proportions would be alot closer to this adriana runway pic). And on the subject of the butt looking different, I think its clear this other photo has been photoshopped, and that could easily change the look and shape of it. Also, Adriana's ass has looked completely different than it does in the pic i posted above (in the tiger one piece suit). So it could be a case of that, too. I am not saying I am sure its her, but I think its possible. If anything, this kinda makes me think it is her. Quote
Neo52285 Posted May 12, 2005 Author Posted May 12, 2005 this is a better example.... i still say its not adriana in the picture though. adriana doesnt have the best ass and that ass in the picture isnt adriana's ass...too good to be adriana's i have more..... and if the questioned picture is an editorial...where are the other pictures and why wouldnt we have heard about such an editorial....one of our members always know if there was a new editorial featuring adriana and victoria's secret normally doesnt take pictures with the model turning their back completely do the camera....the face is always somewhat visable. Quote
mameha Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 I'd never thought I'd see you say that I agree btw adriana doesnt have the best ass and that ass in the picture isnt adriana's ass...too good to be adriana's Quote
Neo52285 Posted May 12, 2005 Author Posted May 12, 2005 its not the ass that i care about when i think of adriana...its adriana's face and figure that draws me towards her. she doesnt have the best ass but i love adriana's ass. Quote
aznman007 Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 i love her ass too. lol <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i like ur ass. and she loves my ass, so sha boo ya. Quote
Xfiler Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 I think, Adriana has a nice ass !!! But u r right Neo, there is a better one for example Gisele's ass... Quote
Eltorro Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 I think her ass is different and this makes me feel it's very very sexy In this picture from editorial ass is "normal" - everybody think it's nice Adri's ass is so wide ohh mamaaaa Quote
sweet-lady Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 sweet-lady, were those pictures from your signature posted before? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i go to post the picture from my signature in ads! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.