Jade Bahr

@BarbieErin If that means the only thing he's wearing is his pants... (little reminder how Leo looks in pants) ... and his sexy glasses to avoid sh!t like that... ... while ending up with her ...I would actually like this idea a lot King of the jungle instead of king of the world LOL

^Just to be clear I never said it's wrong. It's his life, it's the money he worked for so he can spend it for whatever he wants. But beside from this he's delivering an public image he's not strictly living at in his own private life. Imagine we would all live like Leo. What would happen to earth? It would be destroyed (probably a long time ago) and no money and no charity could save us. So if he wants us to talk about things like this, if he wants us to re-think our actions and what we can do better to protect this earth, to fight against climate change, sorry but if he really wants that he has to accept being in focus for his own actions and sometimes being criticized for destroying this planet much more than you and I could ever do with our lifestyle compared to his lifestyle. And when he's not willing to re think and change his luxurious lifestyle with all the possibilities and privileges he has then why should anyone else do it with so much less??? It's the imbalance I want to point out between our 'normal' lifes and Leos 'oversized' life, our 'small' ressources and Leos 'big' ressources. That's what people bothering the most I think. It's not an easy just right and wrong with nothing in between topic I'm aware of it. At the end of the day there is probably as much 'against' as there is 'for' him. And to be clear again I admire everything he's doing for this planet 🌎

Stumbled about this... ... and had to thought about your last post. Always wished they would do a movie together or even better I would have LOVED seeing Leo in "Training Day" next to him (instead of Ethan Hawke). Incredible movie, incredible performance. Source

He got a lot of response -good and bad ones like always- on twitter for this statement that's why I'm posting it. Can't decide who's cuter.:The left or the right fella

@LuckyGirl This is probably one of the reasons why his latest interviews all fully scripted. To avoid sh!tty unprepared questions and to avoid backlash from sh!tty unprepared answers. Though I have to admit it were more her pushy manner than Leos answers which annoyed me BUT still... I got the feeling he took some credit here for something he didn't (fully) deserve. You love the fucking hollywood lifestyle? Fine. Just stand by it and don't use your charity work like an excuse. This is indeed the first time I can understand the hypocrite submission at least a little bit. No offence, Leo

^I don't know if it's possible but the point is I never saw or heard Leo doing or at least trying to make a change in Hollyweird. Correct me if I'm wrong (I would be glad if I just missed or forget something here). I think we all agree it can be no change without active combat and if someone is in the powerful position to make such a move especially in a place like Hollywood it's Leo. With privileges it comes specific obligations and who's more privilege than Leo? I never expected a revolution but there is actually not one single action I could name he had done in this direction (neither when it comes to his glamorous playboy lifestyle nor the try to fight the manly, white washed, rotten system) so I'm wondering why this reporter was pushing him so hard in the 'celebrity against hollywood lifestyle/system corner'. I mean she must had something in mind otherwise she wouldn't ask him these questions. Because he's driving a hybrid? lololol She would have probably a meltdown seeing him after that interview straight partying with a bunch of supermodels and champagne on a yacht lmao Some people would even go further and say he is PART of the problem: https://www.indiewire.com/2019/07/leonardo-dicaprio-called-out-not-working-woman-director-1202160522/ I don't want to bash Leo here, I just thought about those things for a while when I saw the interview Of course NOT TO abuse his power to hurt women people IS one step in the right direction. Though when it comes to his (young) girlfriends some people would say of course he's abusing his power and status otherwise they wouldn't date him.

Interesting new interview to me. But I have to say one thing about Leo being against the hollywood system... lol I mean I love Leo and I think he's one of the better humam beings in Hollywood and I know he likes to see himself as a kind of "outsider" there but honestly what has he ever done to change the fucked up misogynist hollywood system?

I'm kinda shocked I didn't notice it earlier:

Thx to all those recent set pics I realized how much I'm into Leo with suspenders 😍 They make look his shoulders even more broader... Source ... and his body more lanky. Perfect combo Source

I know he's not looking like this anymore but oh boy I had the biggest crush on him in "The Mummy" Source Always had a thing for that kind of hair I would say 😋 Source And her Source Actually they are still one of my favorite movie couples Source Their chemistry was just... Source ... something special 😍 Source In short: Yay to this casting choice

Leo in some HBO drama would be frickin' awesome Close up: Source Closer 😋 Source Source

Found this at tumblr and thought it's kinda fun because I even remember the time where some fans of the books pictured Leo as Carlisle Cullen lol Crazy fancast: Leo as Carlisle Cullen (Twilight) Beside from Twilight being -- well Twilight (of course in no way Leo would have EVER signed for this role probably not even in his younger days lol) I always liked the character of Carlisle Cullen. In another context I claim this charcater wouldn't even that uninteresting. I mean Leo as a blonde, handsome, doomed vampire who's fighting with his inner demon(s) of desperation to be as good as he can be, honoring life as the doctor he is vs the blood sucking monster he's now while facing an endless life of lonliness and then falling hard for one of his female human patient is nothing what gives me a hard time to picture ‘which would be worse - to live as a monster? or to die as a good man?’ Source Maybe I'm just desperate for another love story with Leo

^I looked a bit through twitter and goldderby comments for DLU trailer reactions and I think I can say one thing for sure overall: People are interested in DLU to say the least The biggest complaining people seem to have that it's from netflix. And Meryl Streeps look LOL

Wow 😲 Source

This looks awesome and funny as hell. I already peed in my pants in those seconds

Was this ever posted? #allbirds Source

Just because I had to laugh when I saw it lmao #living meme

^Wearing his new buyed bigfoot cap. He's such a smart ass cutie, knows exactly how to bewitch the people around him (I mean even more than he probably usually does just by breathing the same air LOL). Haha, love him

Thx all for the latest updates. Love the one on set in his regular clothes. So handsome. I really have a thing for (his) arms

^Thx. I can discuss the sh!t out of this movie and I'm tired of people telling me it's just a random love story on a big boat with handsome faced Leo (which his face is of course 😋). But gosh, the movie IS NOT ABOUT Jack Dawson. I know I'm repeating myself but when I watched this movie the first time as a young innocent girl (of course I felt in love with Jack LOL) but like @akatosh said Rose was such an inspirational strong female character. She literally blew me away with her courage, her lack of fear, her SPIRIT, her beauty and her fiery red locks (see another little symbolism since Jack is recognizing her fire right away loose and wildly in the wind of a free spirit - the mess she is here it's the closest to her true self she probably ever was before). I mean she started her journey as being this wealthy woman with a luxurious life. From a materialistic perspective, she has everything. But despite that, despite being a “spoiled little brat” (as Jack puts it), she is deeply unhappy due to the oppressive social expectations of 1912 that prevent her from being the free-spirited artist that she’s always longed to be. It makes sense then that Rose’s journey goes from “hopeless, depressed woman who attempts suicide” to “woman who finds the will to live and frees herself from those who oppress her”. This character development is damn inspiring in itself. She lived her life to the fullest, she made it count. And because she made it count, because she lived her life honoring the precious sacrifice Jack did for her, he is now waiting for her at the clock - just as he did back in 1912 - only this time so they can spend eternity together. This not only is insanely romantic, it’s also super inspiring to me. This is a woman who started her journey by trying to commit suicide, but found her own strength in love, rebelled against an insanely oppressive system that was making her miserable and preventing her from being the person she wanted to be and from leading the life she wanted. Jack dies for her because he knows that Rose - unlike him - has never truly been alive until that point. She has spent a life imprisoned by social expectations where she was forced to play the part of flawless first class puppet woman. Jack knows she’s never been able to cherish the true gift that being alive is and he wants her to have a chance at happiness and freedom, even if he won’t be there to be part of it. And Rose knows this, values it and carries it on with her for her entire life because she won’t let him die in vain. She truly never lets go. She frees herself by faking her own death in a very obvious ‘fuck off’ to everyone who’s oppressed her, gives up every single thing she has and starts a brand new life from scratch where being happy and going after her dreams are her only goals - because life is way too short and precious for us to not do exactly that. That is Jack’s legacy and she carries and honors it until her very last breath. And let’s not talk about the fact this woman gave up every.single.thing she had in order to start a new life where she could control her own fate, free of all the impositions that had been forced on her until then. After the sinking, Rose arrived in New York with nothing but the clothes she was wearing, a new name and a broken heart...and a 56-carat diamond necklace in her pocket worth millions of dollars. And yet... She never sold it. Even when she had nothing. And that’s inspiring and empowering AF. As she says in the alternate ending (this is why I like the alternate ending better even though the implementation IS cheesy as hell lol): It was so easy for pennyless Rose Dawson to arrive in New York, sell the diamond and get settled for life, and absolutely no one would have judged her for it, but she knew that doing so would undermine the lesson that she learnt from Jack: that wealth doesn’t matter anywhere near as much as living authentically, by following your dreams and by being the person you want to be. Cal had bought her the diamond in an attempt to further trap her into the dutiful housewife role, to mark her as his property. As such, any money she'd get from selling the diamond would always be money that he had indirectly provided to her. But Rose couldn’t let that happen - despite her precarious situation, she refused to benefit from the materialistic symbol of her oppression. In other words: integrity. And ultimately that is why I absolutely love her. So I ask you again from a woman's point of view HOW CAN YOU NOT ADMIRE this female powerhouse of a character in a world where (still) most of the time Jack would be the hero of the story??? How is she not the brightest kicking asses role model of all hollywood blockbuster ever made??? I mean she's mocking about men's small penisses like a boss lmao And if that's not the biggest line of saying FUCK YOU to an abusive, over controlling, dumb asshole in cinema history I don't know what it is. She's fucking iconic that's what she is. Not only to me but to millions of people till today. She's better than every marvel or dc hero could ever be. She's the one with the goddamn axe to save her man. I could talk endlessly about her

^Like this. Read it (read both of the metas I posted) and then tell me you don't see those scenes in a whole new perspective. Titanic Meta 2/∞ Much like with the rest of the film, there is much more about this Titanic scene than just the romantic smooch that popular culture loves to reduce it to. For her whole life, Rose has been denied freedom under the restraints of her surroundings. Her own mother and Cal have put her in a cage, metaphorically cutting her wings by expecting her to conform to patriarchal expections without question. So when Jack asks her to step up over the railing and spreads her arms, he is symbolically spreading her wings. He is opening that cage she’s been trapped in, and showing her that she can be free. She can fly... and fly she does. Source

^You don't have to be a fan of the movie nor to like it. We are just discussing here the story of a rare female main character who are most people don't give enough credit to be so much more than "a fairytale love story" because Rose doesn't need a freaking man/hero to live her life fullifly by her dreams and whishes and expectations. She is her own freaking hero. If you missed that you missed the whole point of the movie. It's clearly not a simple fairytale. Actually if you see it that way Titanic is more realistic than most typcial so called "hollywood loves stories". Because what is always the typical happy ending for the female character in those movies? Riiiiight, to get her damn man lol Titanic is different from all that. It's far away from being cheesy or shallow - at least not in the main message. Maybe the implemenatation of J. Cameron is sometimes a bit cheesy I'm not denying it That's my whole point This is btw why I never understood Leo is acting like a fool when it comes to this movie. It's the most feministic thing he's ever done as an actor (being the pretty side piece of a strong woman) and that long before #metoo and all that shit. He should be fucking proud of it.

^ Titanic Meta 1/∞ The “put your hands on me” line was never just a cheesy line initiating a love scene. This line is a direct callback to what Cal tells Jack in the beginning of the film: in the first scene, Cal is the one in control. What he means is that he is the only one allowed to touch Rose, because he looks at Rose as his property. Rose has no say on the matter - Cal is the one making that decision for her, he’s the one with the power. So when Rose tells Jack to put his hands on her, she is taking that power back. She is claiming control of herself, because it’s her body and she is the only one who gets to decide who can and cannot touch her. Source Sry but who's saying this movie is just "another cheesy" love story isn't paying attention AT ALL. I'm not saying it isn't a romantic love story (it is of course) but it's more than this. It's a story about a strong woman full of symbolism, feminism, parallels and metas in a time where men's society didn't want women to be strong. You just have to sit down and pay attention to Rose' story. Because it is her story. For me Jack always was more or less her romantic wingman who helped her to not just to find her inner strength but to live it. She doesn't really need him. He's the 'kick off' to her freedom but never the main reason. That's always her.

@akatoshI love Shailene. Most people think she's weird (at least I read it most of the time about her) but I really like her (work) 😍 How on earth is Titanic a fairytale? There are dying thousands including well the male main part lol The true hero here is of course Rose. There is barely another massive successful blockbuster about a female heroine, so I really can't unverstand how you can't love this movie where a woman is literally saying fuck you to everyone who's treaten her badly. It's a movie about surviving. Not only the sinking but a (womans) life with so many (socially) bounderies.