Jump to content
Forum Look Announcement

conflagrated

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by conflagrated

  1. conflagrated replied to Cee's post in a topic in General Discussion
    damn all these girls are looking good! sanne was prob my favorite just from this online gallery. thanks, i felt a bit of the suspense and got a good taste of the show!!!
  2. I'm thirty-one and trying to learn more about beautiful women over time in Western popular culture. I thought this would be a good place to discuss "Girls of the Decade" and get some insight/feedback from real experts on female beauty and style in the public eye, the ones that defined movements and eras. I am starting the chart with some wild guesses. Please feel free to add or correct me! 2000s Paris Hilton (unfortunately!) 1990s Britney Spears 1980s Madonna 1970s Farah Fawcett 1960s ?? 1950s Marilyn Monroe 1940s ?? 1930s ?? 1920s ?? 1910s ?? very bad start, i admit. let me do some research and fill some in!
  3. conflagrated replied to conflagrated's post in a topic in General Discussion
    guys, you are very funny with your "is it a monster or is it a human?" type criteria for a 1 female, but that's why the title of this posting is 7, 8, 9, 10 --- in other words, the interesting part is when you get to the top tier of female beauty. maybe i should have done the thread the other way i thought about: 7, 8, 9, 10 FACES CURRENTLY ON TV: GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE OF EACH this whole thing re-occured to me when i started watching the gastineau girls with my wife on dvd from netflix. holy shit, brittney gastineau is a !@#$% ten! i had forgotten how incredible hot one girl's face could be. so if brittney gastineau is a ten face, who is a nine? nine, i say is evangeline lily. i was watching lost and was mezmerized. (her face only, her body is less than a nine). she is so beautiful. but she's no gastineau girl. (at least this is just based on season one that i saw) eight....someone hot but within the normal range of life...a delicious morsel...hmm, i don't watch that much tv is the problem...maybe the girl from laguna beach, lauren conrad? the blonde who went on to the hills. lc, right? seven...shit, no idea.
  4. conflagrated replied to pmech's post in a topic in Female Athletes
    And here is the entire posting (because Bill Simmons columns quickly become pay only). Hope it's not too long to post here, if not I have no problems if you delete it! Still from Russia with love By Bill Simmons Page 2 MIAMI -- I went to the Heat-Cavs game Thursday night with my old intern, Jamie, who now works for "Rome is Burning" and came down to Miami for the week of shows here. Back when I started my old Web site in the summer of '97, Jamie was one of my first readers -- a sarcastic 15-year-old kid who landed in every mailbag mostly because I barely had enough readers to make up a mailbag. This was the same summer that a smoking-hot tennis star named Anna Kournikova started wreaking havoc, and since the Internet was just starting to round into shape, she was only resonating through some magazine photos and giddy conversations that guys had with their friends. There hasn't been anything quite like her before or since: a blonde, bosomy Russian with killer legs and a perpetual pout. She was prettier than most supermodels. She was sexier than most Hollywood stars. When she played Amanda Coetzer in the Australian Open that year, it was probably the greatest 20-second highlight in SportsCenter history, replete with reverential silence from the anchors. They could have released that highlight on DVD by itself and people would have bought it. Unfortunately (and this is an especially big "unfortunately"), Anna may have looked 25, but she didn't turn 16 until June 7. That meant everyone in the mainstream media was terrified to mention her appeal for obvious reasons, although a few sports radio hosts around America crossed the line during the '96 U.S. Open (and took heat for it). When she made it to the third round of the '97 French Open, I remember watching her lose to Martina Hingis (who had her own thing going since she was attractive and a little kooky, which gave her a dangerous edge, kind of like Glenn Close in the first 20 minutes of "Fatal Attraction") and thinking that, even though I was broke at the time, I would have emptied my checking account if they suddenly moved the match to pay-per-view. On the week Anna turned 16, I gleefully made a "two years until she's legal!" joke in a column and received more e-mails than I'd ever received before. She was America's underground sweetheart. And then something magical happened: Wimbledon rolled around and Anna played the best tennis of her life, somehow making it all the way to the semifinals. Meanwhile, I was bartending and working on my new Web site -- translation: I was waking up at 11 every morning and farting around until I had to go to work -- which made me eminently available to watch HBO's around-the-clock coverage. This was an unparalleled middle-of-the-day TV experience; it made the OJ Trial seem pedestrian by comparison. Could Anna keep winning? Could she shock the world and steal Wimbledon? Remember, we were coming off a stretch in women's tennis that was dominated by Steffi Graf, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, Monica Seles and Martina Navratilova that swayed everyone into thinking that Martina Hingis was much cuter than she really was. We weren't remotely ready for anyone like Anna. She was like a surreal cross between the 1980 U.S. Olympic hockey team, LeBron's rookie season and the greatest-looking Bond girl of all-time. Even though Hingis crushed her in the semis, that didn't stop everyone from spending the summer daydreaming about a not-so-distant future when the world's most beautiful female was (A) legal, (B) Russian (nothing like some residue Cold War tensions to spice everything up) and © the best women's tennis player alive. It seemed too good to be true. Unfathomable, even. Could we really spend the next 10-12 years watching Anna covered in her own sweat, bouncing around in tight tennis outfits and demolishing everyone in her path? Were we headed for a world where somebody who looked like this would win major after major, become the Tiger of tennis, appear on television 50-60 times per year and transform every red-blooded male into a diehard tennis fan? Could this actually HAPPEN? Nope. Didn't happen. As it turned out, Anna Kournikova just wasn't that good. When tennis experts started questioning her talents after the post-Wimbledon wave of "Here comes Anna!" stories, we all hoped it was just sour grapes. (I mean, of course Mary Carillo and Billie Jean King were going to be threatened by Anna's ascendance. She had taken women's tennis into a completely different direction, one where the game didn't matter as much as outfits and sex appeal. Why would the old guard think this was a good thing?) Anna cracked the top 20 in 1998, pulled off a few upsets, graced more than a few magazine covers, landed more than a few commercials, and caused an out-and-out riot on the Internet (nobody had more photos out there, and nobody had more people looking for them). She won the 1999 Australian Open doubles title with Hingis, lost the legendary "Headlights Match" in that same tournament to Mary Pierce (there hadn't been that much jiggling on TV since the heyday of "Charlie's Angels") and made it to the fourth round in that year's Australian and French Opens. During that time, she also shattered Mariah Carey's record for "most girls that have ever hated another girl for no real reason." If you brought up her name in a mixed group, the claws would come flying out. Every other female loathed her, instinctively, habitually. And if you asked them why, the reasons were always petty and unsubstantiated. Stuff like, "She just doesn't seem like a nice person to me," or "She's more concerned with how she looks than how she plays" or even "I just don't like the look on her face." The only thing that came close to watching Kournikova play tennis was watching other women openly seethe about her success. To them, she was like one of those evil movie characters in a John Hughes movie who runs the whole high school, flirts with everyone else's boyfriend and makes those cutting backhanded compliments to other girls like "I'm glad you finally did something about your hair." And frankly, this made the Kournikova Era even more magical than it already was. Everything crested in June of '99, when three things happened: 1. Anna turned 18. This meant that the mainstream media could now discuss her looks without calling her a "tennis Lolita" and making everyone feel icky. Much better. 2. She entered Wimbledon with a ton of hype and enraged the old guard to no end. You could feel the venom from Carillo, King and Navratilova throughout the HBO coverage. It was palpable and fantastic. Every time Anna nailed a winner down the baseline, you kept expecting one of them to snap and scream, "WHORE! WHORE!" I wish ESPN Classic would create a weekly show called "Classic Kournikova" just so we could relive the announcing from those matches -- it's never been approached before or since. Actually, I wish ESPN Classic would create a weekly show called "Classic Kournikova" just so there would be a show called "Classic Kournikova." Like you wouldn't watch this? 3. After winning her first three Wimbledon matches, Anna battled a heavily favored Venus Williams in the fourth round and took the first set. An upset was brewing. The crowd was buzzing. The HBO announcers were doing everything to jinx her short of screaming "Noonan!" during her second serve and dousing her photos with chicken blood. Anna was prancing around, taking that extra split-second to bend over for balls and eating it up. She was going to rule the world. You could feel it. Only later did we realize the significance of the moment ... because that's exactly when the Kournikova Era peaked. Seriously, that was it. Up a set to Venus, she was then decimated in the next two sets, prompting a free fall in which Anna flopped at the U.S. Open and ended up going 6-8 over the second half of 1999 (including the Venus loss). Off the court, it became obvious that she was relishing a sexpot image, showing up at various red-carpet events, refusing to confirm or deny reports that she was engaged to Pavel Bure and then Sergei Fedorov, coyly wearing a wedding ring just to screw with everyone, making an appearance in "Me, Myself and Irene" and being profiled in a leering Sports Illustrated feature by Frank Deford that practically shattered the Unintentional Comedy Scale (although the pictures made it all worth it). She was also raking in huge sums of money -- upward of $10 million a year just from endorsements -- and since she wasn't winning anything and didn't seem to care that she wasn't winning anything, that made her an easy target for grizzled writers looking for a good high-horse column. She finished an underwhelming 47-29 in 2001 and struggled to a 16-12 record in 2002 because of back problems (or so she said), making news only because she fell for singer Enrique Iglesias after they filmed a music video together. Not only had her tennis prime passed, but she was in her 20s and the Lolita/tennis prodigy thing had vanished. She didn't seem any more or less beautiful than anyone else, and her ongoing tennis failures robbed her of that bitchy, glowering "not only am I prettier than you, I'm going to kick your ass in this match" aura that made her so great in the first place. When she effectively retired after the 2003 season, the prevailing reaction seemed to be, "She was still playing?" For the last four years, she's spent her time traveling around the world with Iglesias, playing charity tournaments and doing whatever wealthy smoking-hot former tennis players do, making news only because she lost a jaw-dropping amount of weight. And honestly? I can't remember the last time I thought about her or heard her name mentioned. You could even make the case that she's irrelevant, except for one thing: She had an enormous and underrated impact on the sports world from 1997 to 2002, only it's never been properly understood or appreciated. I realized this at the Heat-Cavs game. Some of the Heat employees were nice enough to show us around before the game, even allowing us to hang out in Shelley's Lounge, which was unlike any other suite we've ever seen. You can't see the court because it's located near the locker rooms, but it's three times the size of a normal suite and loaded with plasmas, video games, foosball, an open bar, free food and everything else you can imagine. There's one on each side of the court, and they both spill into a much bigger bar that's open only to courtside ticket holders, celebrities and VIP guests. You couldn't have something like this in Sacramento or Boston, but you could definitely have it in Miami. So we're hanging out in Shelley's Lounge and who walks in? Anna Kournikova and Enrique Iglesias. In case you haven't seen her, she's disgustingly thin now -- still pretty, but more like a supermodel, and you would never know that she once played a professional sport. But still, it's Anna Kournikova, for God's sake! And here's where Jamie becomes relevant to this story. First of all, in the Pantheon of Faces, Jamie's "I'm standing three feet away from Anna Kournikova" Face will never, ever, EVER be topped. I am not a good enough writer to describe it. Joyce or Tolstoy couldn't have described it. And second, as Jamie explained to us later, not only did he play high school tennis in Massachusetts during the same year that Frank Deford wrote the feature that influenced so many high school and college students across America, the team actually brought that issue on the van for every one of their its matches. Why? you ask. Partly as a good-luck charm, partly as reliably good reading fodder for any trip. The team never knew when it would get bored on the van and want to start poring through Kournikova pictures again. For whatever reason, I never properly appreciated the Kournikova Era until she walked into Shelley's Lounge, saw Jamie's reaction and heard the story about his tennis team. Maybe she was overrated as a tennis player, but has an athlete ever had a bigger impact over a short span that couldn't be calibrated in any way, shape or form other than the look on somebody's face when they enter the room? I say no. Eventually, we headed up to our seats and took in some of the Cavs-Heat game, which was interesting for five reasons. First, Miami's crowd was much livelier than I expected, although it was admittedly one of the marquee games of the year; if your fans can't get up for LeBron, Shaq and Wade on TNT, you shouldn't have a basketball team. Second, they have the coolest scoreboard I've ever seen -- it looks like something out of the movie "Alien." Third, the difference between Wade (killing himself and ramming his way to the rim over and over again like a running back) and LeBron (on cruise control and seeming disinterested most of the time -- and yes, I know he's hurt, but I've watched him mail it in too many times this season and we're nearing the point where Barkley needs to call him out on TNT) was absolutely startling. One guy just wants it more than the other guy. It's that simple. Fourth, Scot Pollard shaved his head into a blond Mohawk and kept his goatee with the weird knobs on it and STILL was outdone by the perplexing patch of hair on the back of Drew Gooden's neck. And fifth, it always feels like a bigger game when Shaq is playing -- even if he's not the same kind of force anymore -- and I will miss him when he retires to chase down criminals in some random town in Florida. All in all, a good, lively game. As halftime was approaching, I glanced over at Jamie and saw his wheels turning. More Kournikova. More Kournikova. So I threw him a bone and said, "Hey, wanna go back to the lounge at halftime?" followed by Jamie answering "yes" even as I was still finishing the word "halftime." We headed back there, walked underneath the stadium and passed through a bar to get to the lounge .. and suddenly, there were Enrique and Anna again. She was standing with her back to the wall, Enrique was in front of her, and she had her arms wrapped around him, only she was watching us walk by her and relishing the attention because he couldn't see where she was looking. At this point, Jamie was moving at the speed of the people in "War of the Worlds" coming out of their houses to stare at the giant UFO -- it's amazing he didn't walk into a chair or a table. I played it a little differently, glancing at her quickly, waiting for her to make eye contact, then glancing away like I wasn't impressed, hoping it would piss her off (like she would give a crap). We headed into the lounge to throw some water on Jamie, and not even a minute later, they were standing right behind us again and she was defiantly making eye contact -- almost like a Fembot, like she was thinking, "I'm Anna Kournikova, if you don't look impressed within the next three seconds, I'm going to shoot you with my jublees." And for the first time, everything about the Kournikova Era fell into place. She just wanted to be noticed, even if she had to settle for two random dudes in the VIP lounge of a regular-season NBA game. Did she ever care about tennis? Probably not. Did she use tennis as a vehicle to dress in skimpy outfits and wrap every red-blooded male around her finger? Probably. Anyway, it worked. I melted into a puddle and Jamie stopped breathing and briefly died. They pranced by us as Jamie immediately re-evaluated his life and everything that's ever happened in it, eventually deciding that this was his greatest moment since the Red Sox won the World Series. Anyone who says Anna Kournikova's tennis career didn't matter is just plain lying. She DID have an impact. Only a handful of athletes and former athletes can still stop a room in its tracks. She's one of them. "When you were sitting in that tennis van 10 years ago," I asked him, "did you ever imagine that you'd be drinking three feet away from Kournikova?" "No," Jamie said. "No. Never. I never would have believed it." These are the things that happen during Super Bowl Week in Miami.
  5. conflagrated replied to pmech's post in a topic in Female Athletes
    I was going to post that Bill Simmons column too, dboy! It is a very interesting take on our beloved Anna! Here is the money shot: And for the first time, everything about the Kournikova Era fell into place. She just wanted to be noticed, even if she had to settle for two random dudes in the VIP lounge of a regular-season NBA game. Did she ever care about tennis? Probably not. Did she use tennis as a vehicle to dress in skimpy outfits and wrap every red-blooded male around her finger? Probably. Anyway, it worked. I melted into a puddle and Jamie stopped breathing and briefly died. They pranced by us as Jamie immediately re-evaluated his life and everything that's ever happened in it, eventually deciding that this was his greatest moment since the Red Sox won the World Series. Anyone who says Anna Kournikova's tennis career didn't matter is just plain lying. She DID have an impact. Only a handful of athletes and former athletes can still stop a room in its tracks. She's one of them.
  6. conflagrated replied to zoltar's post in a topic in General Discussion
    I love brunettes, they drive me nuts :evil: I love so many of them, from the American ones (Josie!) to the European ones (Paulina! Ines! Virginie Ledoyen!), and of course the Latin American ones (Salma! Roselyn Sanchez!) and of course oh so many others!, but three of my favorites right now that come to mind, are, two of my all-time favorites, models, tall thin and delicious, with porcelin perfect faces and lean fragile bodies: Marija Vujovic and Nicole Trunfio and a new girl that I found recently, who won Miss Colombia in 2006 and somehow did not win Miss Universe: Valerie Dominguez Tarud I am not sure if we are allowed to post youtube links here, but if we are, please check out this vision of perfection!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjcTCWLNXQA Ah, and there are so many more out there, yet to be discovered!!!
  7. conflagrated replied to zoltar's post in a topic in General Discussion
    oh i like her! ^^ did i mention that i LOVE LOVE LOVE brunettes! so dark and sultry!!!
  8. love this girl! catrinel menghia
  9. conflagrated posted a post in a topic in General Discussion
    How do you rate a beautiful girl? How do you quantify the unquantifiable? What makes a a girl a 10? a 9? an 8? a 7? This is what I have, starting with a 5. Anything below a five is not even worth discussing! 5 not cute, not attractive. no thanks. too many "clear and present" flaws to consider attractive in any way. 6 barely attractive . some definitely obvious and possibly even major flaws, but some redeeming qualities. wouldn't catch my eye, though. 7 cute. an attractive girl. some flaws are evident, but harmonious enough that things look good. i would look at her and notice her. 8 very cute. so pretty. very attractive. a sexy girl. i would look at her and check her out. would probably turn my head on the street if the situation were right (not with wife, etc). a definite looker. minor flaws, but overwhelmingly attractive. would perk me up and distract me from other things and give me a sense of pleasant pleasure. "a delicious morsel" 9 wow! so hot! a hot and beautiful girl. i would check her out and feel pang of remorse once i couldn't see her anymore. she would give me pain and anguish and also a rush of excitement. no flaws evident. just gorgeous. hot hot hot. the kind you see every once in a while in new york, and all the guys turn. maybe a few times a month, or more if you're lucky. 10 stunning. you see these once or twice a year. a rare specimen. absolutely divine. extremely rare. really, a different breed, a different species. makes you question your purpose in life and leaves you shaken and confused for the rest of the days, and days after. what you live for.
  10. agreed!!!
  11. wow, you are right! great stuff!! i love real people : )
  12. i think i agree! so lean and long but also strong and athletic! that stomach! those legs!!
  13. that's a nice pic! she towers over narciso!
  14. nicole trunfio is i think a great combination of "high" fashion (the sculpted face, long body, elegant look), but also sexy and fun. she seems to like to party. : )
  15. hope it's not a repeat, and if it is, ahhhh still so good!
  16. conflagrated replied to a post in a topic in Female Fashion Models
    love it, thanks!!! youshare seems to be pretty good, do others recommend it as well?
  17. yeah, why'd you get banned? rebel! : )
  18. shag: naomi. she has (had?) a hot bod. marry: liya. she is so beautiful and classy. looks like an aristocrat. push off a cliff into shark-infested waters: tyra! soooo annoying. um, let's see: marilyn, audrey, sophia loren.
  19. it's gotta be grace kelly! or paulina. grace or paulina. maybe cindy. or christy. those are my top four of the past fifty years.
  20. conflagrated replied to g's post in a topic in General Discussion
    bump! some nice girls here!!
  21. conflagrated replied to incessant's post in a topic in General Discussion
    http://revistatrip.uol.com.br/149/tripgirl/02.htm holy smokes! (nudity) (can anybody do screen grabs??)
  22. conflagrated replied to rosada's post in a topic in Female Fashion Models
    OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  23. i love thisgirl! so classy, brainy, and yet smoking hot! we need more pics of her!
  24. conflagrated replied to a post in a topic in Female Fashion Models
    wow, thanks dont suppose anyone have those in bigger quality? those polaroids are amazing! i second the request for HQ!!! pretty please