acfr1968

She looks so gorgeous! Simple, casual, comfortable and, yet, very stylish. Amazing.

via ANV

Yeah, the big hair can definitely go, but the clothes are incredible and I do really like the whole color scheme.

"Belle du Seigneur" new movie poster version via ANV Facebook Vogue China June 2011 preview via ANV Vogue China June 2011 preview via ANV I'm in love with this editorial... Can't wait for the HQ!

ANV

I don't get that Forbes list. Natalia worked like mad this past year and, yet, she slipped to the 9th position. Her earnings also took a dive, from US$5.5 million to US$4 million. She got more contracts, she got a big part on a movie, she did some fashion shows... what gives? This economy is definitely not improving. <_< The full list: 1. Gisele Bündchen: $45 million 2. Heidi Klum: $20 million 3. Kate Moss: $13.5 million 4. Adriana Lima: $8 million 5. Alessandra Ambrosio: $5 million 6. Daria Werbowy: $4.5 million 7. Lara Stone: $4.5 million 8. Carolyn Murphy: $4.3 million 9. Natalia Vodianova: $4 million 10. Candice Swanepoel: $3 million

Vogue China June 2011 via ANV

Chanel 2011 SS Marie Claire China, april & may 2011 (sorry if repost )

thedarknv, I like to read your interventions. You always come as a voice of reason... Yeah, there is nothing apparently wrong with the pictures. You don't actually see anything (like in Boltenko's case, they are pretty much innocent). And it's not really clear that they were holding hands. They might be just friends, or people discussing business. It's possible. One of the pictures look suspicious, though. You might also ask, if the paparazzi in fact saw them kissing and holding hands, why don't we have an irrefutable, clear snapshot to prove it? I wonder that myself. All things considered, Natalia must know that paparazzi are all over New York. It's a big city, true, but photographers know where celebrities stay, the hotels, the watering holes. She must know she will be followed, especially if there's a hot trail (paparazzi had seen her with Peskov the day before, of course at least one of them would be interested to follow the story). So, I come to this conclusion: it's either nothing (and therefore she doesn't much think of the consequences) or she must be possessed by some sort of tabloid gossip death wish. I mean, Justin is MIA for more than a year now, the divorce talk never really dies, she is paired up with other men... she knows she's under scrutiny, she should be more careful. I think exactly what you said: she's alone, she's sad, she's tired, she's overbooked, she's pretty much lost. Justin is never mentioned. Natalia says "my family", "my children" - never "our" family, "our" children, nor "my husband", as she used to. She might deny marriage troubles, but her words, the whole scenario suggest something else. Going out to lunch twice with a guy you're just friends with is nothing out of the ordinary, but Natalia is fully aware of the interest of the press; she should be more thoughtful, lover or no lover. In Manhattan?, she was bound to be seen. Spletinik.ru (today)

The event is in name file... 031016FashionRocksThePrinceTrustLondon08b October 16th, 2003 Fashion Rocks ~ The Prince Trust, London, UK.

Oh, not stupid... Me too, I think she is. I'm worried (why should I...??? ) about her being vulnerable right now. If the marriage is really over, I'm thinking, they used to have a very strong bond, a close relationship. It must be hurting a lot, whatever happened. Sometimes, we just jump into anything so that the pain might stop. Oh, man, that sounded cheesy... but I'm upset too. Sorry, folks.

Yeah, I have this same impression, that they have separated, even if no papers were signed. The phrase is read here out of context, but if true (of course!), it sounds terribly selfish, even if they're not in a love relationship at all (which, you're right, is a possibility). If Natalia and Justin are not a couple anymore, I'd rather see her with boyfriends, not sneaking around with "lovers" . We're in the XXI century, for Pete's sake! Why would a woman like Natalia need to be in a marriage that is no more and for such a long time now...? On the other hand, why would she meet her lover twice in New York, hold hands and kiss in public places? New York must have one of the highest paparazzi-per-square-meter ratio in the world, second perhaps only to LA. She must know she's bound to bump into a photographer or another, especially when something big is happening and celebrities are swarming all over the city. Oh, well, we're never going to figure this puzzle out. One day, who knows?, when she talks about it. I just wish her all the happiness in the world, because she truly deserves it.

via Spletinik.ru Google translate: 04/05/11 16:15 Natalia Vodianova in the company of a mysterious handsome man: it's a date? A few days ago there were rumors and causes a stir secular gossips: talking, that Natalia Vodianova new beau! And okay would simply be talking, so more and confirmed the information together photos of Natasha and handsome young man. It appeared to be a British financier, Alexander Peskov. Natalia and Sasha was found in New York. And not once, but twice. For the first time, as they say, they were walking in Central Park, the zoo and supposedly kissing. However, it is in the photo is not sealed. But the next brunch Sasha and Natasha's picture was taken. Model and financier snack at Nello's. Another meeting Vodianova and Sands also took place in Manhattan. They, like, holding hands, but seeing the camera, the model quickly turned away and released the hand of his cavalier. In general, the picture was confirmed by a meeting of Natasha and Sasha. That connects them - will only occasionally. And whether it can serve as proof of a split family Vodianova, which they say since last year, too, will know for sure later.

Yeah, ariti, I've just read this, and was ready to believe it was another piece of gossip, but your pictures kind of made me hold my breath. Although we don't actually see her holding hands with him. But his reaction is weird. Pining and dining Last Updated: 12:28 AM, May 4, 2011 Posted: 12:19 AM, May 4, 2011 | More Print After dismissing rumors her marriage to aristocratic British property heir Justin Portman was troubled, Russian supermodel Natalia Vodianova had a long, cozy lunch with another wealthy man, Sasha Pesko, yesterday. The beauty, a face of Gucci, was spotted dining with the handsome financier -- also known as Aleksandar Pesko and previously linked to Spanish model Eugenia Silva -- at Nello after a stroll in Central Park. Leaving the restaurant, Pesko tried to hide his face and told a photographer, "It wouldn't be good for me" if the photos came out. Last November, the 29-year-old model, who has three children with Portman, dismissed reports that her marriage was in trouble as "rubbish" and added, "I want to have at least two more babies." Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/pining_and...N#ixzz1LOIONCu5 ETA: If it's Pesko and he really said that to the photographer, I correct myself - his reaction was not very gentlemanly, to say the least. "It wouldn't be good for me"??? Natalia, RUN, FAST, NOW! <_<

ANV

ANV

ANV "(...) For those who'd known McQueen, memories poked their way through the evening's glamour. ‘Certain pieces were almost torturous in a way. I saw so many girls almost faint backstage,’ Natalia Vodianova recalled. ‘But we all loved it, because it was a real show and the atmosphere was so exciting always. It was magical.’ When she was asked about McQueen, Jessica Stam couldn't summon the words. ‘He was always very…’ she began. But then she swallowed hard and excused herself. (...)"

via ANV via BellaSugar

Natalia, you're a Princess too!