Memento Mori
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Memento Mori
-
Womens Secret
-
old social media post I enlarged and gfy'd https://gfycat.com/dizzytallasianlion
-
made a few gfycats, mostly of sarah dancing or posing on IG or tiktok https://gfycat.com/bogusunsightlyhectorsdolphin https://gfycat.com/barrenglisteningborzoi https://gfycat.com/richfailingirrawaddydolphin https://gfycat.com/thoroughsoreflyingsquirrel https://gfycat.com/idealmealybuckeyebutterfly
-
IG
-
Women's Secret
-
fixed, download both parts and open the first one
Was disappointed at the resolution these were in so I ran 'em through Topaz Gigapixel. For comparison (regular v. processed) rest in zip file yzabel_mora-processed_fixed.7z.001 yzabel_mora-processed_fixed.7z.002
Instagram dance video (upconverted with Topaz Video Enhance AI) https://gfycat.com/quaintbackflies
ph. Ingo Dumreicher
+1 and ph. Cody McGibbon
ph. Ingo Dumreicher
Actually, you know what, here's a theory as to why most people do not give a shit about this: the model search. It gives away how this is all arbitrary box checking of models, who are chosen because they look a certain way. "And this year we have an old one, and a bald one, and a curvy one!" The problem is, perhaps, even more about the process than the aesthetics themselves. It's all just so obviously contrived. People write off things they sense are fake. At least pageants are tournaments. Compare with ESPN's Body Issue. ESPN's Body Issue had a bunch of different body types in it, and not all of them were stereotypical chiseled athletes. Plenty of big bodies in there. But to whatever degree anyone talked about it, nobody seemed to have the same problems with it. Why? It wasn't arbitrary. Those people are already famous for something else, and there are plenty of professional athletes who look good in different ways. It was more of (or more easily sold as) an organic celebration of a cohort that is already diverse. It already made sense to have naked Vince Wilfork in the same magazine as naked Sue Bird. "The SI Swimsuit Issue" as a concept was always transparently a marketing scheme, for a publication that every other month was writing about baseball, and nobody has any reason to suspect that's changed.
Few actually care. Conservatives don't think anyone should be posing provocatively in swimsuits, those who would criticize it from the left don't think corporations can empower anyone, and liberals (the target audience) see it as cynical pandering -- no matter how sincere MJ might be. Who loves it? Sponsors and partners, who get to wrap themselves in the label of vague inclusiveness at no cost; which is why the issue gets promoted on legacy platforms, but few on social media still give a shit any more; more or less the same thing Raytheon does when it sponsors Pride.
gfycats https://gfycat.com/exaltedsorehummingbird https://gfycat.com/carefreeringedamericancreamdraft https://gfycat.com/grotesquedimwittedfoxterrier https://gfycat.com/soupypinkcusimanse
Denise in Burning Dog (2020) K2S https://k2s.cc/file/6e713c18584b6/ds_bd1.mp4 DF http://depositfiles.com/files/phxfvihxz K2S https://k2s.cc/file/e4bea2cf274e7/ds_bd2.mp4 DF http://depositfiles.com/files/75o5e378d
Womens Secret
got tired of parsing all the Korean, which i dont read lol plus the thread seemed to be in good hands
ph Frankie Martin
