worshipper pa

Yes, November 21 is the most important day of the year. I know it sounds bad but I have suffered so much for her! The worst thing is to life without her, without even meeting her! All the self-torture I practise in order to worship her is nothing compared to my mental suffering. Physical pain takes mental pain away and in fact I feel strong happiness when I suffer self-inflicted pain.

Thank you purple! I'm nothing compared to Goddess In

Sin City (N) So Close (Y)

You are welcome miss_vellutini!

Claudia Schiffer ~15 years ago.

BEL CANTO MULL HISTORICAL SOCIETY

Thanks Avenger! fantastic pics!

If it's 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999%, let's assume it's 100%. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No, you can't do that!

Why do you believe Michael Crichton? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It has already worked. Yes, it works but that does not mean it can predict things with 100% accuracy.

Why do you believe Michael Crichton?

Quantum physics is about uncertainties! Future of this thread: Unknown.

Yes, but the trick is to know everything with 100% accuracy. In practise that's impossible.

Laplace Demons have overestimated their capabilities.

We have to separate two things, accurate and correct predictions. A prediction can be correct without being accurate. For example I can predict that you reply this post within the next 2 hours. If you do so, my prediction has been 100% correct but not that accute. When it comes to predicting wheather we can predict what kind of wheather it's going to be day after tomorrow but not what it is going to be exactly.

Please don't humiliate yourself arguing these things with worshipper pa. What is the time limit of short-run? One second? Four minutes? Two days? No matter how short the time is you can't predict the behaviour with 100% accuracy. Of course in slow deterministic systems you can do insanely accurate prediction in the short-run but that's not 100%, it's 99,99999999999% or something like that. The prediction errors are so small we can't measure them! The predictions seem 100% accure when they are not.

Alike? I don't think so.

1) Predicting things with 100% accuracy is impossible. 2) The more chaotic system the shorter time you can predict it's behaviour 1) + 2) => No, I don't believe.

Hello Chris! Hybrid - Wider Angle

Handel is REALLY good! He's the third best composer ever after Elgar and J. S. Bach.

In Finland the newspapers were full of that crap for one week! :x

Thanks again miss_vellutini!

worshipper pa thanks Avenger!

Thanks miss_vellutini!

Oh, shit! My bad! I mean: Have you ever hijacked this thread?